World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
74
Citations
21058
World Ranking
19381
National Ranking
9650

Nael Martini publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nael Martini sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 170 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Nael Martini D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nael Martini sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nael Martini was affiliated with the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in the United States. Their academic and research career was connected to this prominent institution, which is known for its contributions to cancer research and treatment.

During their career, Nael Martini did not have publicly listed recent papers, frequent co-authors, or specific frequent publication venues available. There were no documented book publications associated with them either.

No detailed records were found regarding their main fields of study, subfields, or specific topics that they focused on throughout their scholarly work. Similarly, information about awards or honors received by Nael Martini was not present.

The absence of detailed publication or research data makes it difficult to provide a comprehensive analysis of their scientific contributions or particular research interests. However, their affiliation with a leading cancer center suggests involvement in medical or clinical research related to oncology or related biomedical sciences.

Given that Nael Martini is deceased, references to their career and work are described in the past tense to accurately reflect this status.

Best Publications

  • Multiple primary lung cancers.

    Nael Martini;Myron R. Melamed

  • Incidence of local recurrence and second primary tumors in resected stage I lung cancer

    Nael Martini;Manjit S. Bains;Michael E. Burt;Maureen F. Zakowski

  • The role of surgery in N2 lung cancer.

    Nael Martini;Betty J. Flehinger

  • Thymoma: A multivariate analysis of factors predicting survival

    David Blumberg;Jeffrey L. Port;Benny Weksler;Ruby Delgado

  • Preoperative chemotherapy for stage IIIa (N2) lung cancer: the Sloan-Kettering experience with 136 patients.

    Nael Martini;Mark G. Kris;Betty J. Flehinger;Richard J. Gralla

  • Cisplatin and vindesine combination chemotherapy for advanced carcinoma of the lung: A randomized trial investigating two dosage schedules.

    Richard J. Gralla;Ephraim S. Casper;David P. Kelsen;David W. Braun

  • Results of resection in non-oat cell carcinoma of the lung with mediastinal lymph node metastases.

    Nael Martini;Betty J. Flehinger;Muhammad B. Zaman;Edward J. Beattie

  • Lung resection for colorectal metastases. 10-year results.

    Patricia M. McCormack;Michael E. Burt;Manjit S. Bains;Nael Martini

  • Complications of Surgery in the Treatment of Carcinoma of the Lung

    Fumio Nagasaki;Betty J. Flehinger;Betty J. Flehinger;Nael Martini;Nael Martini

  • Bronchial carcinoids. Review of 124 cases

    Brian C. McCaughan;Nael Martini;Manjit S. Bains

  • Early lung cancer detection: results of the initial (prevalence) radiologic and cytologic screening in the Memorial Sloan-Kettering study.

    Betty J. Flehinger;Myron R. Melamed;Muhammad B. Zaman;Robert T. Heelan

  • Multiple Pulmonary Resections in the Treatment of Osteogenic Sarcoma

    Nael Martini;Andrew G. Huvos;Valerie Miké;Ralph C. Marcove

  • Cellular schwannoma: a variety of schwannoma sometimes mistaken for a malignant tumor.

    James M. Woodruff;Thomas A. Godwin;Robert A. Erlandson;Myron Susin

  • Thymomas: Clinicopathologic features, therapy, and prognosis

    Mostafa A. Batata;Nael Martini;Andrew G. Huvos;Rafael I. Aguilar

  • Indications for pleurectomy in malignant effusion.

    Nael Martini;Nael Martini;Manjit S. Bains;Edward J. Beattie

  • Prospective study of 445 lung carcinomas with mediastinal lymph node metastases.

    Nael Martini;Betty J. Flehinger;Muhammad B. Zaman;Edward J. Beattie

  • Aberrant p53 Expression Predicts Clinical Resistance to Cisplatin-based Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

    Valerie Rusch;David Klimstra;Ennapadam Venkatraman;Julie Oliver

  • VAB-6: an effective chemotherapy regimen for patients with germ-cell tumors.

    G J Bosl;R Gluckman;N L Geller;R B Golbey

  • Malignant esophagorespiratory fistula: management options and survival.

    Michael Burt;William Diehl;Nael Martini;Manjit S. Bains

  • The changing role of surgery for pulmonary metastases

    P. M. McCormack;N. Martini

Frequent Co-Authors

Manjit S. Bains
Manjit S. Bains Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Michael E. Burt
Michael E. Burt Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Robert J. Ginsberg
Robert J. Ginsberg Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Valerie W. Rusch
Valerie W. Rusch Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Mark G. Kris
Mark G. Kris Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Robert J. Downey
Robert J. Downey Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
David P. Kelsen
David P. Kelsen Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Andrew G. Huvos
Andrew G. Huvos Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Larry R. Kaiser
Larry R. Kaiser Temple University
Willet F. Whitmore
Willet F. Whitmore Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in exploring alternative entry points to healthcare careers beyond traditional med school? There are flexible online pathways for students at various experience levels. For registered nurses seeking to advance, choosing from affordable rn to bsn programs can be a cost-effective way to earn a bachelor's degree and expand professional opportunities.

If you hold a non-nursing degree but aspire to a nursing career, direct entry msn programs for non-nursing majors online offer a fast-track route to a master's in nursing—and entry into a high-demand field—even for those without prior nursing credentials.

Students concerned about admissions difficulty may explore the easiest bsn program to get into for more accessible options. Additionally, those interested in administrative healthcare roles should consider medical billing and coding schools that accept fafsa, which can provide career training and financial aid for qualifying students.

Choosing the right online program depends on your prior education, career goals, and financial circumstances. Researching these options can help you build a rewarding healthcare career tailored to your needs.

Best Scientists Citing Nael Martini

Recently Published Articles