World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 58 2514 2403 32 32 316 11662

Ming Chen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ming Chen between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ming Chen published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 20.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 66 publications in 2023. 96 of the 565 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 66. Peak 66 publications in 2023. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 31 publications 2014: 41 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 27 publications 2017: 35 publications 2018: 26 publications 2019: 53 publications 2020: 45 publications 2021: 39 publications 2022: 37 publications 2023: 66 publications 2024: 42 publications 2025: 54 publications
1999 2025

565 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ming Chen: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 3
2001 0
2002 3
2003 2
2004 2
2005 4
2006 3
2007 2
2008 3
2009 6
2010 8
2011 7
2012 14
2013 31
2014 41
2015 11
2016 27
2017 35
2018 26
2019 53
2020 45
2021 39
2022 37
2023 66
2024 42
2025 54
Total 565
Download as CSV

Ming Chen publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ming Chen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 308–317 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 316 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154 316
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Ming Chen D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ming Chen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166 58
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Ming Chen is affiliated with the Technical University of Denmark and has a research profile spanning engineering and materials science. Their work primarily focuses on materials chemistry and mechanical, electrical, aerospace, and ocean engineering subfields.

The scientist has contributed significantly to topics including:

  • Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
  • Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
  • Drilling and Well Engineering
  • Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
  • Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
  • Catalytic Processes in Materials Science

Ming Chen has authored numerous papers in respected venues. Some recent publications include:

  • "Covalent organic framework photocatalysts: structures and applications" (2020), Chemical Society Reviews
  • "Life cycle assessment of H2O electrolysis technologies" (2020), International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
  • "Simulation of cooling plate effect on a battery module with different channel arrangement" (2022), Journal of Energy Storage
  • "Ni migration in solid oxide cell electrodes: Review and revised hypothesis" (2021), Fuel Cells
  • "A review: Approaches for aerodynamic performance improvement of lift-type vertical axis wind turbine" (2021), Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments

Their frequent coauthors include Tiankui Guo, Peter Vang Hendriksen, Xiaofeng Tong, Zhanqing Qu, and Henrik Lund Frandsen. Publication venues with multiple contributions comprise SSRN Electronic Journal, ECS Meeting Abstracts, ECS Transactions, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, and Ceramics International.

Best Publications

  • Centralized Control for Parallel Operation of Distributed Generation Inverters in Microgrids

    K. T. Tan;X. Y. Peng;P. L. So;Y. C. Chu

  • Multifunctional Enhancement for Highly Stable and Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells

    Yuan Cai;Yuan Cai;Jian Cui;Jian Cui;Ming Chen;Ming Chen;Miaomiao Zhang

  • High-temperature-resistant and colorless polyimide: Preparations, properties, and applications

    Chenghan Yi;Chenghan Yi;Weimin Li;Sheng Shi;Sheng Shi;Ke He;Ke He

  • Reversible solid-oxide cells for clean and sustainable energy

    M. B. Mogensen;M. Chen;H. L. Frandsen;C. Graves

  • Ni/YSZ electrodes structures optimized for increased electrolysis performance and durability

    Anne Hauch;Karen Brodersen;Ming Chen;Mogens Bjerg Mogensen

  • Coordinated Control and Energy Management of Distributed Generation Inverters in a Microgrid

    K. T. Tan;P. L. So;Y. C. Chu;M. Z. Q. Chen

  • Microstructural Degradation of Ni/YSZ Electrodes in Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cells under High Current

    Ming Chen;Yi-Lin Liu;Janet Jonna Bentzen;Wei Zhang

  • Circulating tumor DNA analysis depicts subclonal architecture and genomic evolution of small cell lung cancer

    Jingying Nong;Yuhua Gong;Yanfang Guan;Xin Yi

  • Thermodynamic analysis of synthetic hydrocarbon fuel production in pressurized solid oxide electrolysis cells

    Xiufu Sun;Ming Chen;Søren Højgaard Jensen;Sune Dalgaard Ebbesen

  • Thermodynamic modeling of the ZrO2–YO1.5 system

    Ming Chen;Bengt Hallstedt;Ludwig J. Gauckler

  • Life cycle assessment of H2O electrolysis technologies

    Guangling Zhao;Mikkel Rykær Kraglund;Henrik Lund Frandsen;Anders Christian Wulff

  • Comparison of microstructural evolution of fuel electrodes in solid oxide fuel cells and electrolysis cells

    M. Trini;A. Hauch;S. De Angelis;X. Tong

  • Thermodynamic Assessment of the Co-O System

    Ming Chen;Bengt Hallstedt;Ludwig J. Gauckler

  • High-performance, flexible, and ultralong crystalline thermoelectric fibers

    Ting Zhang;Kaiwei Li;Jing Zhang;Ming Chen

  • Influence of the oxygen electrode and inter-diffusion barrier on the degradation of solid oxide electrolysis cells

    Per Hjalmarsson;Xiufu Sun;Yi-Lin Liu;Ming Chen

  • Ni migration in solid oxide cell electrodes: Review and revised hypothesis

    Mogens B. Mogensen;Ming Chen;Henrik Lund Frandsen;Christopher Graves

  • Thermodynamic modeling of the ZrO 2 -YO 1.5 system

    Ming Chen;Bengt Hallstedt;Ludwig J. Gauckler

  • Relation Between Ni Particle Shape Change and Ni Migration in Ni–YSZ Electrodes – a Hypothesis

    Mogens Bjerg Mogensen;Anne Hauch;Xiufu Sun;Ming Chen

  • Power-to-fuels via solid-oxide electrolyzer: Operating window and techno-economics

    Ligang Wang;Ming Chen;Rainer Küngas;Tzu-En Lin

  • Microstructural studies on degradation of interface between LSM–YSZ cathode and YSZ electrolyte in SOFCs

    Yi-Lin Liu;Anke Hagen;Rasmus Barfod;Ming Chen

  • Corrosion stability of ferritic stainless steels for solid oxide electrolyser cell interconnects

    Marián Palcut;Lars Mikkelsen;Kai Neufeld;Ming Chen

  • Electrical conductivity of Ni–YSZ composites: Degradation due to Ni particle growth

    Mikko Pihlatie;Mikko Pihlatie;Andreas Kaiser;Mogens Bjerg Mogensen;Ming Chen

  • Stability of Ni–yttria stabilized zirconia anodes based on Ni-impregnation

    Trine Klemensø;Karl Tor Sune Thydén;Ming Chen;Hsiang-Jen Wang

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Vang Hendriksen
Peter Vang Hendriksen Technical University of Denmark
Mogens Bjerg Mogensen
Mogens Bjerg Mogensen Technical University of Denmark
Bengt Hallstedt
Bengt Hallstedt RWTH Aachen University
Yong Du
Yong Du Central South University
Weiwei Li
Weiwei Li Chinese Academy of Sciences
Minfang Han
Minfang Han Tsinghua University
Yuanhong Liu
Yuanhong Liu Chinese Academy of Sciences
Joong Kee Lee
Joong Kee Lee Korea Institute of Science and Technology
Liming Xie
Liming Xie National Center for Nanoscience and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring engineers and technologists have a wealth of online education options tailored to emerging fields and evolving industry demands. Exploring ux degree programs offers students an opportunity to blend creativity with technology through user-centered design—a rapidly growing area in digital product development.

For those interested in leadership roles, many consider is project management a good degree to weigh the value of this credential. Project management skills are vital across technology, engineering, and business sectors, making such degrees highly versatile.

Exciting advancements in fintech and digital currencies are also shaping educational options. Pursuing a blockchain degree positions graduates at the forefront of innovation, preparing them to tackle challenges in secure data management and financial technologies.

Finally, students interested in combining technology with athletic industries may want to explore online sports degrees. These programs teach essential management, analytical, and technical skills, ideal for tech-driven roles in sports organizations.

Best Scientists Citing Ming Chen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles