World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
48
Citations
8225
World Ranking
4613
National Ranking
304

M. Grae Worster publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Grae Worster sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 130 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

M. Grae Worster D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Grae Worster sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2006 - Fellow of American Physical Society (APS) Citation For making fundamental advances in understanding the interaction between solidification and convection in mushy layers through systematic analytical, numerical and experimental studies

Overview

M. Grae Worster is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Engineering and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a focus on Atmospheric Science, Computational Mechanics, Biomedical Engineering, Molecular Medicine, and Materials Chemistry.

The scientist's work concentrates on topics including:

  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
  • Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
  • Elasticity and Material Modeling
  • Advanced Materials and Mechanics
  • Icing and De-icing Technologies
  • Material Dynamics and Properties

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by M. Grae Worster are:

  • "Colloidal mushy layers," 2021, Journal of Fluid Mechanics
  • "Can unconfined ice shelves provide buttressing via hoop stresses?", 2020, Journal of Glaciology
  • "The formation of grounding zone wedges: theory and experiments," 2020, Journal of Fluid Mechanics
  • "A linear-elastic-nonlinear-swelling theory for hydrogels. Part 1. Modelling of super-absorbent gels," 2023, Journal of Fluid Mechanics
  • "A linear-elastic-nonlinear-swelling theory for hydrogels. Part 2. Displacement formulation," 2023, Journal of Fluid Mechanics

Their frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Fluid Mechanics
  • Experiments in Fluids
  • Journal of Glaciology
  • Soft Matter
  • International Journal of Thermal Sciences

M. Grae Worster has collaborated regularly with several researchers, notably:

  • Joseph J. Webber
  • Jacob Pantling
  • Shaun Fitzgerald
  • Merlin A. Etzold
  • A.J. Hutchinson

M. Grae Worster received the award of Fellow of the American Physical Society (APS) in 2006, recognized for fundamental advances in understanding the interaction between solidification and convection in mushy layers through systematic analytical, numerical, and experimental studies.

Best Publications

  • Solidification of an alloy from a cooled boundary

    M. Grae Worster

  • CONVECTION IN MUSHY LAYERS

    M. Grae Worster

  • Interfacial conditions between a pure fluid and a porous medium : implications for binary alloy solidification

    M. Le Bars;M. Grae Worster

  • Instabilities of the liquid and mushy regions during solidification of alloys

    M. Grae Worster

  • Premelting dynamics in a continuum model of frost heave

    Alan W. Rempel;J. S. Wettlaufer;M. Grae Worster

  • Desalination processes of sea ice revisited

    Dirk Notz;Dirk Notz;M. Grae Worster

  • Dynamic solidification of a binary melt

    H. E. Huppert;M. G. Worster

  • NATURAL CONVECTION IN A MUSHY LAYER

    M. Grae Worster

  • Premelting Dynamics

    Unknown

  • Natural convection during solidification of an alloy from above with application to the evolution of sea ice

    J. S. Wettlaufer;M. Grae Worster;Herbert E. Huppert

  • Solidification of colloidal suspensions

    S. S. L. Peppin;J. A. W. Elliott;M. Grae Worster

  • Impact of underwater-ice evolution on Arctic summer sea ice

    Dirk Notz;Dirk Notz;Miles G. McPhee;M. Grae Worster;Gary A. Maykut

  • Weakly nonlinear analysis of convection in mushy layers during the solidification of binary alloys

    D. M. Anderson;M. Grae Worster

  • Solidification using smoothed particle hydrodynamics

    Joseph J. Monaghan;Herbert E. Huppert;M. Grae Worster

  • The case for a dynamic contact angle in containerless solidification

    D.M. Anderson;M.Grae Worster;S.H. Davis

  • Convection and crystallization in magma cooled from above

    M.Grae Worster;Herbert E. Huppert;R. Stephen J. Sparks

  • Solidification of an alloy cooled from above Part 1. Equilibrium growth

    Ross C. Kerr;Andrew W. Woods;M. Grae Worster;Herbert E. Huppert

  • Two-dimensional viscous gravity currents flowing over a deep porous medium

    James M. Acton;Herbert E. Huppert;M. Grae Worster

  • In situ measurements of the evolution of young sea ice

    Dirk Notz;M. Grae Worster

  • Time-dependent density profiles in a filling box

    M. Grae Worster;Herbert E. Huppert

  • Morphological instability in freezing colloidal suspensions

    Stephen S.L Peppin;M. Grae Worster;J.S Wettlaufer

  • the phase evolution of Young Sea Ice

    J. S. Wettlaufer;M. Grae Worster;Herbert E. Huppert

Frequent Co-Authors

Herbert E. Huppert
Herbert E. Huppert University of Cambridge
Ross C. Kerr
Ross C. Kerr Australian National University
Daniel L. Feltham
Daniel L. Feltham University of Reading
Andrew W. Woods
Andrew W. Woods University of Cambridge
Richard C. A. Hindmarsh
Richard C. A. Hindmarsh British Antarctic Survey
Andrew F. Thompson
Andrew F. Thompson California Institute of Technology
Paul R. Holland
Paul R. Holland British Antarctic Survey
Miles G. McPhee
Miles G. McPhee University of Washington
Hajo Eicken
Hajo Eicken Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
John R. Lister
John R. Lister University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring engineering and technology often opens the door to a range of interdisciplinary career opportunities. If you’re looking for specialized skills, many online programs now offer flexible pathways into high-demand fields. For example, you might want to enhance your technical expertise with creative digital acumen by exploring social media marketing colleges, which can help you blend technology and marketing strategies.

Those interested in leadership in technology-driven industries may consider enrolling in an online mba aacsb program. An MBA can complement an engineering background, supporting growth in management or entrepreneurial ventures.

Engineering principles are also becoming essential in fields like hospitality and law. Programs such as the online hospitality management program integrate technology solutions for service and operations management. Similarly, legal technology is a rising field. Exploring aba approved paralegal programs can prepare you for tech-driven roles in legal support and compliance.

Investigating these related online degrees can expand your skill set and help you pursue a dynamic career at the intersection of engineering, technology, and other thriving industries.

Best Scientists Citing M. Grae Worster

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles