World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 106 948 838 378 305 347 42903

Jonas C. Peters publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jonas C. Peters between 1994 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jonas C. Peters published across 33 years, from 1994 to 2026, averaging 12 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2006. 12 of the 395 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2006. 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 18 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 17 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 23 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 8 publications 2026: 4 publications
1994 2026

395 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jonas C. Peters: publications per year, 1994 to 2026
Year Publications
1994 2
1995 1
1996 3
1997 2
1998 0
1999 3
2000 3
2001 13
2002 18
2003 9
2004 17
2005 15
2006 23
2007 14
2008 7
2009 12
2010 11
2011 21
2012 12
2013 20
2014 20
2015 20
2016 13
2017 15
2018 10
2019 12
2020 16
2021 14
2022 22
2023 20
2024 15
2025 8
2026 4
Total 395
Download as CSV

Jonas C. Peters publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonas C. Peters sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 341–360 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 347 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628 347
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Jonas C. Peters D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonas C. Peters sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 106–107 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 106 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88 106
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jonas C. Peters is affiliated with the California Institute of Technology in the United States. Their research spans several fields, primarily focusing on materials science and energy.

The scientist's main areas of study include:

  • Materials Science
  • Energy

Within these broader fields, their work delves into specialized subfields such as:

  • Materials Chemistry
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Catalysis
  • Organic Chemistry
  • Inorganic Chemistry

Jonas C. Peters investigates a range of scientific topics related to their main fields, including:

  • Crystallization and Solubility Studies
  • X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
  • CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction
  • Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Ionic liquids properties and applications
  • Metalloenzymes and iron-sulfur proteins

Their publication record highlights several recent papers that illustrate the scope of their research:

  • "Molecular enhancement of heterogeneous CO2 reduction", 2020, published in Nature Materials
  • "Catalytic N2-to-NH3(or -N2H4) Conversion by Well-Defined Molecular Coordination Complexes", 2020, published in Chemical Reviews
  • "Cascade CO2 electroreduction enables efficient carbonate-free production of ethylene", 2021, published in Joule
  • "Photoinduced copper-catalysed asymmetric amidation via ligand cooperativity", 2021, published in Nature
  • "Tandem electrocatalytic N2 fixation via proton-coupled electron transfer", 2022, published in Nature

Frequent co-authors in Jonas C. Peters's research include:

  • Paul H. Oyala
  • Theodor Agapie
  • Nina X. Gu
  • Pablo Garrido-Barros
  • Nicholas B. Watkins

Publication venues where their work appears regularly comprise:

  • The Cambridge Structural Database
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society
  • ACS Energy Letters
  • Angewandte Chemie International Edition
  • ACS Catalysis

Best Publications

  • Benchmarking Heterogeneous Electrocatalysts for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction

    Charles C. L. McCrory;Suho Jung;Jonas C. Peters;Thomas F. Jaramillo

  • Benchmarking Hydrogen Evolving Reaction and Oxygen Evolving Reaction Electrocatalysts for Solar Water Splitting Devices

    Charles C. L. McCrory;Suho Jung;Ivonne M. Ferrer;Shawn M. Chatman

  • Molecular tuning of CO2-to-ethylene conversion.

    Fengwang Li;Arnaud Thevenon;Alonso Rosas-Hernández;Ziyun Wang

  • Catalytic conversion of nitrogen to ammonia by an iron model complex

    John S. Anderson;Jonathan Rittle;Jonas C. Peters

  • Asymmetric copper-catalyzed C-N cross-couplings induced by visible light.

    Quirin M. Kainz;Carson D. Matier;Agnieszka Bartoszewicz;Susan L. Zultanski

  • Synthetic control of excited-state properties in cyclometalated Ir(III) complexes using ancillary ligands.

    Jian Li;Peter I. Djurovich;Bert D. Alleyne;Muhammed Yousufuddin

  • Electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution at low overpotentials by cobalt macrocyclic glyoxime and tetraimine complexes.

    Xile Hu;Bruce S. Brunschwig;Jonas C. Peters

  • Molecular enhancement of heterogeneous CO 2 reduction.

    Dae-Hyun Nam;Phil De Luna;Phil De Luna;Alonso Rosas-Hernández;Arnaud Thevenon

  • Benchmarking nanoparticulate metal oxide electrocatalysts for the alkaline water oxidation reaction

    Suho Jung;Charles C. L. McCrory;Ivonne M. Ferrer;Jonas C. Peters

  • E-Type Delayed Fluorescence of a Phosphine-Supported Cu2(μ-NAr2)2 Diamond Core: Harvesting Singlet and Triplet Excitons in OLEDs∥

    Joseph C. Deaton;Steven C. Switalski;Denis Y. Kondakov;Ralph H. Young

  • Photoinduced Ullmann C-N coupling: demonstrating the viability of a radical pathway.

    Sidney E. Creutz;Kenneth J. Lotito;Gregory C. Fu;Gregory C. Fu;Jonas C. Peters

  • Dinitrogen cleavage by three-coordinate molybdenum(III) complexes: Mechanistic and structural data

    Catalina E. Laplaza;Marc J. A. Johnson;Jonas C. Peters;Aaron L. Odom

  • A Tetrahedrally Coordinated L3Fe−Nx Platform that Accommodates Terminal Nitride (FeIV⋮N) and Dinitrogen (FeI−N2−FeI) Ligands

    Theodore A. Betley;Jonas C. Peters

  • Catalytic N2-to-NH3 (or -N2H4) Conversion by Well-Defined Molecular Coordination Complexes.

    Matthew J. Chalkley;Marcus W. Drover;Jonas C. Peters

  • Photoinduced, Copper-Catalyzed Decarboxylative C–N Coupling to Generate Protected Amines: An Alternative to the Curtius Rearrangement

    Wei Zhao;Ryan P. Wurz;Jonas C. Peters;Gregory C. Fu

  • Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution in Acidic Water with Molecular Cobalt Tetraazamacrocycles

    Charles C. L. McCrory;Christopher Uyeda;Jonas C. Peters

  • Reversible H2 addition across a nickel-borane unit as a promising strategy for catalysis.

    W. Hill Harman;Jonas C. Peters

  • A New Family of Nucleophiles for Photoinduced, Copper-Catalyzed Cross-Couplings via Single-Electron Transfer: Reactions of Thiols with Aryl Halides Under Mild Conditions (O °C)

    Christopher Uyeda;Yichen Tan;Gregory C. Fu;Jonas C. Peters

  • Dinitrogen chemistry from trigonally coordinated iron and cobalt platforms.

    Theodore A. Betley;Jonas C. Peters

  • Catalytic reduction of N2 to NH3 by an Fe-N2 complex featuring a C-atom anchor.

    Sidney E. Creutz;Jonas C. Peters

  • A Low-Spin d5 Iron Imide: Nitrene Capture by Low-Coordinate Iron(I) Provides the 4-Coordinate Fe(III) Complex [PhB(CH2PPh2)3]Fe⋮N-p-tolyl

    Steven D. Brown;Theodore A. Betley;Jonas C. Peters

Frequent Co-Authors

Gregory C. Fu
Gregory C. Fu California Institute of Technology
Neal P. Mankad
Neal P. Mankad University of Illinois at Chicago
Theodor Agapie
Theodor Agapie California Institute of Technology
Brian M. Hoffman
Brian M. Hoffman Northwestern University
David Jenkins
David Jenkins University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Thomas F. Jaramillo
Thomas F. Jaramillo Stanford University
Xile Hu
Xile Hu École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Alexander J. M. Miller
Alexander J. M. Miller University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Edward H. Sargent
Edward H. Sargent Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA can open doors to diverse career opportunities beyond the traditional lab roles. For those interested in healthcare, understanding the steps to become a pharmacist highlights the importance of a strong foundation in chemistry combined with patient care skills. This career path requires specialized training but offers rewarding roles in medication therapy and patient management.

Alternatively, chemistry graduates may explore forensic fields. Programs such as the online colleges for forensic science provide flexible options to study crime scene investigation, toxicology, and analytical techniques. These programs prepare students for critical roles in criminal justice and public safety.

Further specialization is available through an online master's in forensic psychology, where professionals can merge insights from chemistry, psychology, and law to assess criminal behavior and assist investigations.

For those drawn to hands-on technical careers, becoming an autopsy technician is another pathway. Reviewing the detailed educational requirements in autopsy technician profiles can help understanding the role’s demands, salary expectations, and job outlook.

Best Scientists Citing Jonas C. Peters

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles