World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michiel T. O. Jonker

Michiel T. O. Jonker

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
35
Citations
7580
World Ranking
9240
National Ranking
213

Michiel T. O. Jonker publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michiel T. O. Jonker sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 74 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Michiel T. O. Jonker D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michiel T. O. Jonker sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michiel T. O. Jonker is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands and specializes in environmental science. Their research predominantly focuses on toxic organic pollutants and their impact, environmental toxicology and ecotoxicology, and effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals. Additional areas of study include environmental chemistry and analysis, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research, atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, and groundwater flow and contamination studies.

The primary field of Michiel T. O. Jonker's work is environmental science, with a concentration on subfields such as health, toxicology, and mutagenesis. Further subfields include environmental chemistry, atmospheric science, pollution, and environmental engineering.

Frequent publication venues for their research include:

  • Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
  • Nature Protocols
  • Chemosphere

Michiel T. O. Jonker has collaborated with several researchers, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Robert M. Burgess
  • Noël J. Diepens
  • Upal Ghosh
  • Philip M. Gschwend
  • Sarah E. Hale

Among notable recent publications authored or co-authored by Michiel T. O. Jonker are:

  • Ex situ determination of freely dissolved concentrations of hydrophobic organic chemicals in sediments and soils: basis for interpreting toxicity and assessing bioavailability, risks and remediation necessity, 2020, Nature Protocols
  • Polyethylene-Water and Polydimethylsiloxane-Water Partition Coefficients for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Polychlorinated Biphenyls: Influence of Polymer Source and Proposed Best Available Values, 2022, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
  • Effects of sediment manipulation on freely dissolved concentrations of hydrophobic organic chemicals, 2020, Chemosphere

Best Publications

  • Extensive sorption of organic compounds to black carbon, coal, and kerogen in sediments and soils: mechanisms and consequences for distribution, bioaccumulation, and biodegradation

    Gerard Cornelissen;Örjan Gustafsson;Thomas D. Bucheli;Michiel T. O. Jonker

  • Sorption of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and polychlorinated biphenyls to soot and soot-like materials in the aqueous environment: Mechanistic considerations

    Michiel T O Jonker;Albert A Koelmans

  • Black carbon: the reverse of its dark side.

    Albert A. Koelmans;Michiel T.O. Jonker;Gerard Cornelissen;Thomas D. Bucheli

  • Polyoxymethylene solid phase extraction as a partitioning method for hydrophobic organic chemicals in sediment and soot

    Michiel T. O. Jonker;Albert A. Koelmans

  • Extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from soot and sediment: solvent evaluation and implications for sorption mechanism.

    Michiel T. O. Jonker;Albert A. Koelmans

  • The SOLUTIONS project: challenges and responses for present and future emerging pollutants in land and water resources management.

    Werner Brack;Rolf Altenburger;Gerrit Schüürmann;Martin Krauss

  • Preferential sorption of planar contaminants in sediments from Lake Ketelmeer, The Netherlands

    Michiel T. O. Jonker;Foppe Smedes

  • Passive sampling methods for contaminated sediments: Practical guidance for selection, calibration, and implementation

    Upal Ghosh;Susan Kane Driscoll;Robert M. Burgess;Michiel T O Jonker

  • Bioconcentration factor hydrophobicity cutoff: an artificial phenomenon reconstructed.

    Michiel T O Jonker;Stephan A Van der Heijden

  • Effects of sedimentary sootlike materials on bioaccumulation and sorption of polychlorinated biphenyls.

    Michiel T. O. Jonker;Annemarie M. Hoenderboom;Albert A. Koelmans

  • Predicting PAH bioaccumulation and toxicity in earthworms exposed to manufactured gas plant soils with solid-phase microextraction

    Michiel T.O. Jonker;Stephan A. van der Heijden;Joseph P. Kreitinger;Steven B. Hawthorne

  • Extremely slowly desorbing polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from soot and soot-like materials: evidence by supercritical fluid extraction.

    Michiel T. O. Jonker;Steven B. Hawthorne;Albert A. Koelmans

  • PAH Bioavailability in Field Sediments: Comparing Different Methods for Predicting in Situ Bioaccumulation

    Stephan A. van der Heijden;Michiel T. O. Jonker

  • Measuring and Modeling Adsorption of PAHs to Carbon Nanotubes Over a Six Order of Magnitude Wide Concentration Range

    Melanie Kah;Xiaoran Zhang;Michiel T.O. Jonker;Thilo Hofmann

  • Ecotoxicological effects of activated carbon addition to sediments.

    Michiel T. O. Jonker;Martin P. W. Suijkerbuijk;Heike Schmitt;Theo L. Sinnige

  • Sorption of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons to Oil Contaminated Sediment: Unresolved Complex?

    Michiel T. O. Jonker;Anja J. C. Sinke;J. O. S. M. Brils;Albert A. Koelmans

  • Using solid phase micro extraction to determine salting-out (Setschenow) constants for hydrophobic organic chemicals.

    Michiel T.O. Jonker;Barry Muijs

  • Attenuation of Polychlorinated Biphenyl Sorption to Charcoal by Humic Acids

    Albert A. Koelmans;Brendo Meulman;Thijs Meijer;Michiel T. O. Jonker

  • Passive samplers provide a better prediction of PAH bioaccumulation in earthworms and plant roots than exhaustive, mild solvent, and cyclodextrin extractions.

    Jose L. Gomez-Eyles;Michiel T. O. Jonker;Mark E. Hodson;Chris D. Collins

  • Measuring Picogram per Liter Concentrations of Freely Dissolved Parent and Alkyl PAHs (PAH-34), Using Passive Sampling with Polyoxymethylene

    Steven B. Hawthorne;Michiel T. O. Jonker;Stephan A. van der Heijden;Carol B. Grabanski

Frequent Co-Authors

Albert A. Koelmans
Albert A. Koelmans Wageningen University & Research
Gerard Cornelissen
Gerard Cornelissen Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Upal Ghosh
Upal Ghosh University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Steven B. Hawthorne
Steven B. Hawthorne University of North Dakota
Sarah E. Hale
Sarah E. Hale Norwegian Geotechnical Institute
Danny D. Reible
Danny D. Reible Texas Tech University
Robert M. Burgess
Robert M. Burgess Environmental Protection Agency
Keith A. Maruya
Keith A. Maruya Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
Michael J. Lydy
Michael J. Lydy Southern Illinois University Carbondale

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary fields and career pathways. For those interested in spatial data and mapping technologies, pursuing one of the top GIS masters programs can enhance expertise in geographic information systems, a crucial tool in environmental analysis and management.

Leadership and policy-making roles often require strong administrative skills. An accelerated mpa one year program is ideal for professionals looking to advance quickly in public administration related to environmental regulation and sustainable development.

Understanding the social dimensions of environmental issues is essential. Earning one of the best online bachelors in sociology programs equips students with insights into human behavior, community impact, and social justice—key components of environmental stewardship.

For educators and researchers, online doctoral options that minimize dissertation barriers are attractive. Several online edd programs no dissertation allow professionals to advance their academic credentials while focusing on applied environmental education and leadership.

Best Scientists Citing Michiel T. O. Jonker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles