| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Molecular Biology | 76 | 1159 | 599 | 270 | 17643 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Michael Potter between 1952 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael Potter published across 75 years, from 1952 to 2026, averaging 4.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 1988. 5 of the 368 publications appeared in the last two years.
368 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1952 | 1 |
| 1953 | 0 |
| 1954 | 0 |
| 1955 | 0 |
| 1956 | 1 |
| 1957 | 3 |
| 1958 | 5 |
| 1959 | 4 |
| 1960 | 3 |
| 1961 | 2 |
| 1962 | 4 |
| 1963 | 3 |
| 1964 | 5 |
| 1965 | 7 |
| 1966 | 4 |
| 1967 | 5 |
| 1968 | 7 |
| 1969 | 6 |
| 1970 | 3 |
| 1971 | 5 |
| 1972 | 5 |
| 1973 | 15 |
| 1974 | 12 |
| 1975 | 12 |
| 1976 | 6 |
| 1977 | 7 |
| 1978 | 7 |
| 1979 | 7 |
| 1980 | 7 |
| 1981 | 9 |
| 1982 | 8 |
| 1983 | 11 |
| 1984 | 17 |
| 1985 | 15 |
| 1986 | 19 |
| 1987 | 1 |
| 1988 | 20 |
| 1989 | 5 |
| 1990 | 8 |
| 1991 | 4 |
| 1992 | 5 |
| 1993 | 4 |
| 1994 | 5 |
| 1995 | 9 |
| 1996 | 6 |
| 1997 | 10 |
| 1998 | 1 |
| 1999 | 4 |
| 2000 | 3 |
| 2001 | 0 |
| 2002 | 3 |
| 2003 | 5 |
| 2004 | 1 |
| 2005 | 5 |
| 2006 | 3 |
| 2007 | 6 |
| 2008 | 3 |
| 2009 | 2 |
| 2010 | 2 |
| 2011 | 0 |
| 2012 | 2 |
| 2013 | 0 |
| 2014 | 0 |
| 2015 | 0 |
| 2016 | 1 |
| 2017 | 0 |
| 2018 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0 |
| 2020 | 1 |
| 2021 | 0 |
| 2022 | 7 |
| 2023 | 10 |
| 2024 | 2 |
| 2025 | 4 |
| 2026 | 1 |
| Total | 368 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Potter sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 270 publications — 75th percentile
75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 47–56 | 7 | |
| 57–66 | 17 | |
| 67–76 | 65 | |
| 77–86 | 90 | |
| 87–96 | 125 | |
| 97–106 | 131 | |
| 107–116 | 162 | |
| 117–126 | 177 | |
| 127–136 | 158 | |
| 137–146 | 158 | |
| 147–156 | 146 | |
| 157–166 | 159 | |
| 167–176 | 131 | |
| 177–186 | 110 | |
| 187–196 | 112 | |
| 197–206 | 100 | |
| 207–216 | 89 | |
| 217–226 | 98 | |
| 227–236 | 74 | |
| 237–246 | 72 | |
| 247–256 | 63 | |
| 257–266 | 53 | |
| 267–276 | 54 | 270 |
| 277–286 | 49 | |
| 287–296 | 52 | |
| 297–306 | 43 | |
| 307–316 | 46 | |
| 317–326 | 41 | |
| 327–336 | 42 | |
| 337–346 | 31 | |
| 347–356 | 28 | |
| 357–366 | 29 | |
| 367–376 | 26 | |
| 377–386 | 24 | |
| 387–396 | 24 | |
| 397–406 | 14 | |
| 407–416 | 13 | |
| 417–426 | 20 | |
| 427–436 | 12 | |
| 437–446 | 20 | |
| 447–456 | 11 | |
| 457–466 | 10 | |
| 467–476 | 14 | |
| 477–486 | 14 | |
| 487–496 | 10 | |
| 497–506 | 13 | |
| 507–516 | 13 | |
| 517–526 | 2 | |
| 527–536 | 4 | |
| 537–546 | 6 | |
| 547–556 | 8 | |
| 557–563 | 6 | |
| 564+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Potter sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 76 D-Index — 63rd percentile
63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 40–41 | 36 | |
| 42–43 | 101 | |
| 44–45 | 115 | |
| 46–47 | 121 | |
| 48–49 | 118 | |
| 50–51 | 130 | |
| 52–53 | 106 | |
| 54–55 | 116 | |
| 56–57 | 113 | |
| 58–59 | 129 | |
| 60–61 | 120 | |
| 62–63 | 105 | |
| 64–65 | 131 | |
| 66–67 | 95 | |
| 68–69 | 97 | |
| 70–71 | 106 | |
| 72–73 | 83 | |
| 74–75 | 89 | |
| 76–77 | 77 | 76 |
| 78–79 | 70 | |
| 80–81 | 73 | |
| 82–83 | 60 | |
| 84–85 | 48 | |
| 86–87 | 45 | |
| 88–89 | 50 | |
| 90–91 | 31 | |
| 92–93 | 51 | |
| 94–95 | 43 | |
| 96–97 | 38 | |
| 98–99 | 39 | |
| 100–101 | 41 | |
| 102–103 | 29 | |
| 104–105 | 33 | |
| 106–107 | 35 | |
| 108–109 | 20 | |
| 110–111 | 38 | |
| 112–113 | 19 | |
| 114–115 | 28 | |
| 116–117 | 13 | |
| 118–119 | 23 | |
| 120–121 | 16 | |
| 122–123 | 15 | |
| 124–125 | 11 | |
| 126–127 | 21 | |
| 128–129 | 7 | |
| 130–131 | 13 | |
| 132–133 | 14 | |
| 134–135 | 17 | |
| 136–137 | 9 | |
| 138–139 | 8 | |
| 140–141 | 16 | |
| 142–143 | 7 | |
| 144 | 7 | |
| 145+ | 100 |
Michael Potter was affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States and contributed extensively to interdisciplinary research intersecting computer science, engineering, and biomedical sciences. Their scholarly work spanned multiple areas, with a significant focus on artificial intelligence, biomaterials, and biomedical engineering.
Potter's main fields of study included:
Within these, the scientist specialized in subfields such as:
Thematic research topics covered by Potter were diverse and included:
Among frequent co-authors were William J. Richardson, Michael Everett, Hamlin Liu, Yash Lala, and Christian Loanzon. Potter's research appeared in venues predominantly recognized within computer science and biomedical domains with multiple publications in locations such as:
Representative recent papers included:
Michael Potter was recognized as a member of the National Academy of Sciences since 1981. Their work integrated computational approaches with experimental biomedical engineering techniques, reflecting a bridging of theoretical and applied sciences.
M Potter
Thelma B. Dunn;Michael Potter
Jacalyn H Pierce;Pier Paolo Di Fiore;Stuart A. Aaronson;Michael Potter
Michael Potter;Charlotte Robertson Boyce
Byung Gyu Kim;Cuiling Li;Wenhui Qiao;Mizuko Mamura
E. Shacter;E.J. Beecham;J.M. Covey;K.W. Kohn
Michael Potter
R. Lieberman;M. Potter;E. B. Mushinski;W. Humphrey
S J Smith-Gill;A C Wilson;M Potter;E M Prager
Shinsuke Ohno;Magda Babonits;Francis Wiener;Jack Spira
Paul N. Anderson;Michael Potter
Michael Potter;Francis Wiener
Michael Potter;Marshall D. Sklar;Wallace P. Rowe
J. S. Finlayson;R. Asofsky;M. Potter;C. C. Runner
Tu-Chen Cheng;Stuart H. Orkin;Stylianos E. Antonarakis;Michael J. Potter
Albert J. Dalton;Michael Potter;Ruth M. Merwin
JF Mushinski;M Potter;Bauer;EP Reddy
Siegfried Janz;Michael Potter;Charles S. Rabkin
Alexander L Kovalchuk;Joong Su Kim;Sung Sup Park;Allen E Coleman
GL Shen-Ong;M Potter;JF Mushinski;S Lavu
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
Exploring Molecular Biology in the USA opens doors to a wide range of related online degrees and careers in science, healthcare, and beyond. For those interested in understanding human behavior and mental health—complementary fields of biology—an online master in clinical psychology can provide new skills to pursue careers in research, therapy, or healthcare.
If you’re eager to make an impact in communities, consider pursuing an accelerated human services degree online. Such degrees can often be completed quickly, leading to roles in advocacy, case management, or nonprofit organizations.
Science educators seeking a fresh start might be inspired to make a shift, as outlined in this guide for those looking to transition from being a teacher to speech pathologist. This pathway integrates biology, communication, and service.
For a different perspective, the best online architecture degree programs also offer exciting opportunities for those interested in the intersection of design, science, and technology. Each of these pathways can complement a background in Molecular Biology, broadening your academic and professional horizons.
