World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
32
Citations
5286
World Ranking
13042
National Ranking
5251

Micah Adler publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Micah Adler sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 74 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Micah Adler D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Micah Adler sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Micah Adler is affiliated with the University of Massachusetts Amherst in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on computer science, with particular emphasis on computational theory and mathematics, and artificial intelligence.

The scientist's work covers topics including:

  • Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
  • Neural Networks and Applications
  • Semigroups and Automata Theory

Adler has published recent papers predominantly in the venue arXiv (Cornell University). Notable papers include:

  • On the Complexity of Neural Computation in Superposition (2024, arXiv)
  • Towards Combinatorial Interpretability of Neural Computation (2025, arXiv)

While some coauthors appear on papers not led by Adler, frequent coauthors for Adler specifically include:

  • Nir Shavit
  • Linghao Kong
  • Shashata Sawmya
  • Dan Alistarh
  • Angelina Ning

Adler's contributions consistently address theoretical foundations of neural computation, interpretability of neural networks, and related algorithmic insights.

Best Publications

  • Optimal proxy cache allocation for efficient streaming media distribution

    Bing Wang;S. Sen;M. Adler;D. Towsley

  • Parallel randomized load balancing

    Micah Adler;Soumen Chakrabarti;Michael Mitzenmacher;Lars Rasmussen

  • The predecessor attack: An analysis of a threat to anonymous communications systems

    Matthew K. Wright;Micah Adler;Brian Neil Levine;Clay Shields

  • Towards compressing Web graphs

    M. Adler;M. Mitzenmacher

  • An Analysis of the Degradation of Anonymous Protocols.

    Matthew K. Wright;Micah Adler;Brian Neil Levine;Clay Shields

  • Defending anonymous communications against passive logging attacks

    M. Wright;M. Adler;B.N. Levine;C. Shields

  • Randomized Pursuit-Evasion in Graphs

    Micah Adler;Harald Räcke;Naveen Sivadasan;Christian Sohler

  • Minimum energy reliable paths using unreliable wireless links

    Qunfeng Dong;Suman Banerjee;Micah Adler;Archan Misra

  • Surplus fair scheduling: a proportional-share CPU scheduling algorithm for symmetric multiprocessors

    Abhishek Chandra;Micah Adler;Pawan Goyal;Prashant Shenoy

  • Tradeoffs in probabilistic packet marking for IP traceback

    Micah Adler

  • Scheduling space‐sharing for internet advertising

    Micah Adler;Phillip B. Gibbons;Yossi Matias

  • Optimal peer selection for P2P downloading and streaming

    M. Adler;R. Kumar;K. Ross;D. Rubenstein

  • A stochastic process on the hypercube with applications to peer-to-peer networks

    Micah Adler;Eran Halperin;Richard M. Karp;Vijay V. Vazirani

  • Efficient algorithms for neighbor discovery in wireless networks

    Sudarshan Vasudevan;Micah Adler;Dennis Goeckel;Don Towsley

  • On the capacity of information networks

    Micah Adler;Nicholas J. A. Harvey;Kamal Jain;Robert Kleinberg

  • Algorithms for optimizing the bandwidth cost of content delivery

    Micah Adler;Ramesh K. Sitaraman;Harish Venkataramani

  • Trade-offs in probabilistic packet marking for IP traceback

    Micah Adler

  • An n! lower bound on formula size

    Micah Adler;Neil Immerman

  • Channelization problem in large scale data dissemination

    M. Adler;Zihui Ge;J.F. Kurose;D. Towsley

  • Deadline fair scheduling: bridging the theory and practice of proportionate pair scheduling in multiprocessor systems

    A. Chandra;M. Adler;P. Shenoy

Frequent Co-Authors

Don Towsley
Don Towsley University of Massachusetts Amherst
Richard M. Karp
Richard M. Karp University of California, Berkeley
John W. Byers
John W. Byers Boston University
Dan Rubenstein
Dan Rubenstein Columbia University
Brian Neil Levine
Brian Neil Levine University of Massachusetts Amherst
Michael Mitzenmacher
Michael Mitzenmacher Harvard University
Arnold L. Rosenberg
Arnold L. Rosenberg University of Massachusetts Amherst
Bruce M. Maggs
Bruce M. Maggs Duke University
Keith W. Ross
Keith W. Ross New York University
Soumen Chakrabarti
Soumen Chakrabarti Indian Institute of Technology Bombay

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in Computer Science have a wide range of related online degrees to consider, each offering unique career opportunities. For those seeking flexibility and rapid progression, an accelerated computer science degree lets you complete your studies faster, helping you enter the tech workforce sooner.

If your interests extend to applying technical skills to environmental challenges, consider pursuing an online environmental engineering degree. This field is rapidly growing and focuses on designing sustainable solutions.

Another promising option is a career in mechanical engineering. With the cheapest mechanical engineering degree online, you can develop core engineering skills while minimizing your educational expenses.

Physics is another discipline closely aligned with computer science. An online physics bachelor's degree can pave the way for careers in research, technology, or engineering.

Each of these pathways not only broadens your technical expertise but also opens doors to specialized and in-demand roles in today’s STEM-driven job market.

Best Scientists Citing Micah Adler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles