World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
45
Citations
13370
World Ranking
7033
National Ranking
3085

John W. Byers publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John W. Byers sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 123 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

John W. Byers D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John W. Byers sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

John W. Byers is affiliated with Boston University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Business, Management and Accounting, as well as Social Sciences.

The scientist's work includes contributions to subfields such as Marketing, Management Information Systems, and Sociology and Political Science. These areas frame their investigations and academic output.

John W. Byers has focused on topics related to the Sharing Economy and Platforms, FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance, and Digital Marketing and Social Media.

Their recent published research includes the paper titled A first look at online reputation on Airbnb, where every stay is above average, published in 2020 in the journal Marketing Letters.

  • Frequent co-authors: Georgios Zervas, Davide Proserpio
  • Frequent publication venues: Marketing Letters

Best Publications

  • BRITE: an approach to universal topology generation

    A. Medina;A. Lakhina;I. Matta;J. Byers

  • A digital fountain approach to reliable distribution of bulk data

    John W. Byers;Michael Luby;Michael Mitzenmacher;Ashutosh Rege

  • Approximate aggregation techniques for sensor databases

    J. Considine;F. Li;G. Kollios;J. Byers

  • A digital fountain approach to asynchronous reliable multicast

    J.W. Byers;M. Luby;M. Mitzenmacher

  • On the origin of power laws in Internet topologies

    Alberto Medina;Ibrahim Matta;John Byers

  • Accessing multiple mirror sites in parallel: using Tornado codes to speed up downloads

    J.W. Byers;M. Luby;M. Mitzenmacher

  • Simple Load Balancing for Distributed Hash Tables

    John W. Byers;Jeffrey Considine;Michael Mitzenmacher

  • BRITE: Universal Topology Generation from a User''s Perspective

    Alberto Medina;Anukool Lakhina;Ibrahim Matta;John Byers

  • Sampling biases in IP topology measurements

    A. Lakhina;J.W. Byers;M. Crovella;P. Xie

  • Informed content delivery across adaptive overlay networks

    John Byers;Jeffrey Considine;Michael Mitzenmacher;Stanislav Rost

  • FLID-DL: congestion control for layered multicast

    John Byers;Michael Frumin;Gavin Horn;Michael Luby

  • On the marginal utility of network topology measurements

    Paul Barford;Azer Bestavros;John Byers;Mark Crovella

  • XIA: efficient support for evolvable internetworking

    Dongsu Han;Ashok Anand;Fahad Dogar;Boyan Li

  • On the geographic location of Internet resources

    A. Lakhina;J.W. Byers;M. Crovella;I. Matta

  • Utility-based decision-making in wireless sensor networks

    John Byers;Gabriel Nasser

  • XIA: an architecture for an evolvable and trustworthy internet

    Ashok Anand;Fahad Dogar;Dongsu Han;Boyan Li

  • Multi-output packet server with independent streams

    Michael Luby;Ronen Vainish;Lars Rasmussen;David Kushi

  • Global optimization using local information with applications to flow control

    Y. Bartal;J.W. Byers;D. Raz

  • Informed content delivery across adaptive overlay networks

    John W. Byers;Jeffrey Considine;Michael Mitzenmacher;Stanislav Rost

  • Proceedings of the 2016 Internet Measurement Conference

    Phillipa Gill;John Heidemann;John W. Byers;Ramesh Govindan

  • Topology and routing: On the marginal utility of network topology measurements

    Paul Barford;Azer Bestavros;John Byers;Mark E. Crovella

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Mitzenmacher
Michael Mitzenmacher Harvard University
Azer Bestavros
Azer Bestavros Boston University
Georgios Zervas
Georgios Zervas University College London
Michael Luby
Michael Luby BitRipple
Mark Crovella
Mark Crovella Boston University
Ibrahim Matta
Ibrahim Matta Boston University
Georgios Smaragdakis
Georgios Smaragdakis Delft University of Technology
Nikolaos Laoutaris
Nikolaos Laoutaris Madrid Institute for Advanced Studies
Evimaria Terzi
Evimaria Terzi Boston University
Gavin Bernard Horn
Gavin Bernard Horn Qualcomm (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science opens the door to diverse academic and career pathways in the USA. Whether you’re starting your academic journey or considering advanced degrees, it’s important to think about future job prospects, admission requirements, program costs, and your long-term goals.

Fields related to Computer Science consistently rank among the top 10 best majors for the future, offering strong employment prospects and competitive salaries. For those interested in further study, many universities offer easiest masters programs to get into, making it more accessible for students from various backgrounds to specialize or pivot their careers.

If cost is a concern, prospective doctoral students can explore the cheapest doctorate degree online options, which provide flexibility and affordability without sacrificing academic rigor. Likewise, educators seeking professional advancement may be interested in the cheapest edd programs, which offer accelerated formats to fast-track your career.

Taking time to research and select the right program ensures that your education matches your ambitions, budget, and timeline—paving the way for a rewarding future in technology and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing John W. Byers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles