World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
63
Citations
14681
World Ranking
1964
National Ranking
157

M.G. Chapman publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M.G. Chapman sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 152 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

M.G. Chapman D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M.G. Chapman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

M.G. Chapman is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia. Their research primarily falls within the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences. The subfields they focus on include Ecology, Oceanography, Earth-Surface Processes, Global and Planetary Change, and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics related to coastal and marine environments. These topics include:

  • Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
  • Marine and coastal plant biology
  • Coastal and Marine Dynamics
  • Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
  • Marine and fisheries research
  • Coastal and Marine Management

Chapman has contributed to several research papers published in recognized venues. Recent papers include:

  • "The Effect of Shading and Nutrient Addition on the Microphytobenthos, Macrofauna, and Biogeochemical Properties of Intertidal Flat Sediments," published in 2020 in Frontiers in Marine Science
  • "Spatial management of estuarine fisheries resources: Do recreational-only fished estuaries provide conservation to harvested species?" published in 2022 in Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • A.J. Underwood
  • T.J. Tolhurst
  • Richard Murphy
  • Jenifer E. Dugan
  • Laura Airoldi

Publication venues where Chapman has contributed include Frontiers in Marine Science and Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

Best Publications

  • On resemblance measures for ecological studies, including taxonomic dissimilarities and a zero-adjusted Bray–Curtis coefficient for denuded assemblages

    K. Robert Clarke;K. Robert Clarke;Paul J. Somerfield;M. Gee Chapman

  • The introduction of coastal infrastructure as a driver of change in marine environments

    Fabio Bulleri;Maura G. Chapman

  • Scales of spatial patterns of distribution of intertidal invertebrates

    A.J. Underwood;M.G. Chapman

  • Observations in ecology: you can't make progress on processes without understanding the patterns.

    A.J Underwood;M.G Chapman;S.D Connell

  • Evaluation of ecological engineering of "armoured" shorelines to improve their value as habitat.

    M.G. Chapman;A.J. Underwood

  • Paucity of mobile species on constructed seawalls: effects of urbanization on biodiversity

    M. G. Chapman

  • Estuarine and coastal structures: environmental effects, a focus on shore and nearshore structures

    J.E. Dugan;L. Airoldi;M.G. Chapman;S.J. Walker

  • Ecological patterns in multivariate assemblages: information and interpretation of negative values in ANOSIM tests

    M. G. Chapman;A. J. Underwood

  • Intertidal seawalls—new features of landscape in intertidal environments

    M.G. Chapman;F. Bulleri

  • Engineering novel habitats on urban infrastructure to increase intertidal biodiversity

    M. G. Chapman;D. J. Blockley

  • Linking effects of anthropogenic debris to ecological impacts.

    Mark Anthony Browne;A. J. Underwood;M. G. Chapman;Rob Williams

  • Variability at different spatial scales between a subtidal assemblage exposed to the discharge of sewage and two control assemblages

    M.G. Chapman;A.J. Underwood;G.A. Skilleter

  • Dispersion-based weighting of species counts in assemblage analyses

    K. R. Clarke;M. G. Chapman;P. J. Somerfield;H. R. Needham

  • Intertidal assemblages on artificial and natural habitats in marinas on the north-west coast of Italy

    Fabio Bulleri;Fabio Bulleri;Mg Chapman

  • Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Stranded Intertidal Marine Debris: Is There a Picture of Global Change?

    Mark Anthony Browne;Mark Anthony Browne;M. Gee Chapman;Richard C. Thompson;Linda A. Amaral Zettler

  • Power, precaution, Type II error and sampling design in assessment of environmental impacts

    A.J. Underwood;M.G. Chapman

  • Identifying and understanding ecological preferences for habitat or prey

    A.J. Underwood;M.G. Chapman;T.P. Crowe

  • Intertidal assemblages on seawalls and vertical rocky shores in Sydney Harbour, Australia

    Fabio Bulleri;Fabio Bulleri;Mg Chapman;Aj Underwood

  • The assessment of restoration of habitat in urban wetlands

    J.E Grayson;M.G Chapman;A.J Underwood

  • Ecologically Informed Engineering Reduces Loss of Intertidal Biodiversity on Artificial Shorelines

    Unknown

  • Assessment of some controls in experimental transplants of intertidal gastropods

    M.G. Chapman

Frequent Co-Authors

A.J. Underwood
A.J. Underwood University of Sydney
Fabio Bulleri
Fabio Bulleri University of Pisa
Brendan P. Kelaher
Brendan P. Kelaher Southern Cross University
Celia Olabarria
Celia Olabarria Universidade de Vigo
Francesca Rossi
Francesca Rossi University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"
Tim M. Glasby
Tim M. Glasby New South Wales Department of Primary Industries
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson Plymouth University
Paul J. Somerfield
Paul J. Somerfield Plymouth Marine Laboratory
Rob Williams
Rob Williams Oceans Initiative
Melanie J. Bishop
Melanie J. Bishop Macquarie University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Ecology and Evolution, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities in research, education, conservation, and more. Many choose to broaden their expertise by pursuing degrees in psychology and counseling, which complement ecological studies through a focus on human behavior, mental health, and social impact.

If you’re looking for efficient learning options, consider a fast track masters in psychology, which can accelerate your path into advanced research roles or applied sciences. Those interested in helping others may prefer an accelerated online masters in counseling degree, providing the skills needed to promote mental health and well-being.

Forensic fields are also in demand, with highest paying forensic psychology jobs accessible to those who combine psychology expertise with scientific investigation. Additionally, specializing early with child psychology degrees online prepares graduates to support youth facing unique challenges.

Whether you wish to make a positive impact on the environment, wildlife, or people and communities, these online programs offer flexible, affordable pathways to rewarding careers connected to Ecology and Evolution.

Best Scientists Citing M.G. Chapman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles