World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Matthew Feinberg

Matthew Feinberg

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
30
Citations
7981
World Ranking
7623
National Ranking
451

Matthew Feinberg publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew Feinberg sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 302 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 82 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Matthew Feinberg D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew Feinberg sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 261 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Awe, the small self, and prosocial behavior.

    Paul K. Piff;Pia Dietze;Matthew Feinberg;Daniel M. Stancato

  • The Moral Roots of Environmental Attitudes

    Matthew Feinberg;Robb Willer

  • Gossip and Ostracism Promote Cooperation in Groups

    Matthew Feinberg;Robb Willer;Michael Schultz

  • Apocalypse Soon? Dire Messages Reduce Belief in Global Warming by Contradicting Just-World Beliefs

    Matthew Feinberg;Robb Willer

  • The virtues of gossip: Reputational information sharing as prosocial behavior.

    Matthew Feinberg;Robb Willer;Jennifer Stellar;Dacher Keltner

  • From Gulf to Bridge When Do Moral Arguments Facilitate Political Influence

    Matthew Feinberg;Robb Willer

  • A sense of powerlessness fosters system justification: Implications for the legitimation of authority, hierarchy, and government

    Jojanneke van der Toorn;Matthew Feinberg;John T. Jost;Aaron C. Kay

  • AI and the transformation of social science research

    Unknown

  • Moral reframing: A technique for effective and persuasive communication across political divides

    Matthew Feinberg;Robb Willer

  • Flustered and faithful: embarrassment as a signal of prosociality.

    Matthew Feinberg;Robb Willer;Dacher Keltner

  • Polarization in the Contemporary Political and Media Landscape

    Anne E Wilson;Victoria A Parker;Matthew Feinberg

  • Liberating Reason From the Passions Overriding Intuitionist Moral Judgments Through Emotion Reappraisal

    Matthew Feinberg;Robb Willer;Olga Antonenko;Oliver P. John

  • Does Violent Protest Backfire? Testing a Theory of Public Reactions to Activist Violence:

    Brent Simpson;Robb Willer;Matthew Feinberg

  • The activist’s dilemma: Extreme protest actions reduce popular support for social movements

    Matthew Feinberg;Robb Willer;Chloe Kovacheff

  • Understanding the process of moralization: How eating meat becomes a moral issue.

    Matthew Feinberg;Chloe Kovacheff;Rimma Teper;Yoel Inbar

  • My Brother’s Keeper? Compassion Predicts Generosity More Among Less Religious Individuals

    Laura R. Saslow;Robb Willer;Matthew Feinberg;Paul K. Piff

  • Morally Reframed Arguments Can Affect Support for Political Candidates.

    Jan G. Voelkel;Matthew Feinberg

  • The Social Significance of Spirituality: New Perspectives on the Compassion-Altruism Relationship

    Laura R. Saslow;Oliver P. John;Paul K. Piff;Robb Willer

  • Incivility Is Rising Among American Politicians on Twitter

    Unknown

  • Threats to Racial Status Promote Tea Party Support Among White Americans

    Robb Willer;Matthew Feinberg;Rachel Wetts

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Recently Published Articles