World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
42
Citations
7258
World Ranking
7376
National Ranking
273

Mary Drikas publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary Drikas sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 115 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Mary Drikas D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary Drikas sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mary Drikas is affiliated with the South Australian Water Corporation in Australia. Their professional focus is connected to water management and related sectors, reflective of their institutional association.

There is no publicly listed record of recent papers, frequent co-authors, or dominant publication venues associated with this researcher. Similarly, no book publications or specific main fields and subfields of study have been documented in available sources.

Likewise, there are no records of awards or honors linked to Mary Drikas. The absence of these data suggests that publicly accessible research impact or recognition details may be limited or not broadly disseminated.

Without detailed information regarding research topics or specific academic contributions, a comprehensive analysis of their research focus remains unavailable. The affiliation with South Australian Water Corporation indicates a probable involvement in applied water resource management or infrastructure domains.

Best Publications

  • Influence of characterised natural organic material on activated carbon adsorption: II. Effect on pore volume distribution and adsorption of 2-methylisoborneol

    Gayle Newcombe;Mary Drikas;Rob Hayes

  • Granular activated carbon: Importance of surface properties in the adsorption of naturally occurring organics☆

    Gayle Newcombe;Rob Hayes;Mary Drikas

  • Comparison of NOM character in selected Australian and Norwegian drinking waters

    Rolando Fabris;Christopher W.K. Chow;Mary Drikas;Bjørnar Eikebrokk

  • The impact of conventional water treatment processes on cells of the cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa

    Christopher W.K Chow;Mary Drikas;Jenny House;Michael D Burch

  • Adsorption of NOM onto activated carbon: Electrostatic and non-electrostatic effects

    Unknown

  • Microcystin-LR adsorption by powdered activated carbon

    Cosimo Donati;Mary Drikas;Rob Hayes;Gayle Newcombe

  • Absorbance spectroscopy-based examination of effects of coagulation on the reactivity of fractions of natural organic matter with varying apparent molecular weights.

    Gregory Korshin;Christopher W.K. Chow;Rolando Fabris;Mary Drikas

  • Assessing natural organic matter treatability using high performance size exclusion chromatography.

    Christopher W.K. Chow;Rolando Fabris;John van Leeuwen;Dongsheng Wang

  • Using Coagulation, Flocculation, and Settling to Remove Toxic cyanobacteria

    Mary Drikas;Christopher W.K. Chow;Jenny House;Michael D. Burch

  • Pre-treatments to reduce fouling of low pressure micro-filtration (MF) membranes

    Rolando Fabris;Eun Kyung Lee;Christopher W.K. Chow;Vicki Chen

  • Removal of humic acid using TiO2 photocatalytic process--fractionation and molecular weight characterisation studies.

    Sanly Liu;May Lim;Rolando Fabris;Christopher Chow

  • A rapid fractionation technique to characterise natural organic matter for the optimisation of water treatment processes

    Christopher W. K. Chow;Rolando Fabris;Mary Drikas

  • Long term case study of MIEX pre-treatment in drinking water; understanding NOM removal

    Mary Drikas;Mike Dixon;Jim Morran

  • TiO2 Photocatalysis of Natural Organic Matter in Surface Water: Impact on Trihalomethane and Haloacetic Acid Formation Potential

    Sanly Liu;May Lim;Rolando Fabris;Christopher Chow

  • Optimised coagulation using aluminium sulfate for the removal of dissolved organic carbon

    Christopher W.K. Chow;John A. van Leeuwen;Rolando Fabris;Mary Drikas

  • The Impact of the Character of Natural Organic Matter in Conventional Treatment with Alum

    C. W. K. Chow;J. A. van Leeuwen;M. Drikas;R. Fabris

  • The impact of recalcitrant organic character on disinfection stability, trihalomethane formation and bacterial regrowth: An evaluation of magnetic ion exchange resin (MIEX®) and alum coagulation

    Mary Drikas;Christopher W. K. Chow;David Cook

  • Influence of characterised natural organic material on activated carbon adsorption: I. Characterisation of concentrated reservoir water

    Gayle Newcombe;Mary Drikas;Shoeleh Assemi;Ronald Beckett

  • THE EFFECT OF FERRIC CHLORIDE FLOCCULATION ON CYANOBACTERIAL CELLS

    C.W.K. Chow;J. House;R.M.A. Velzeboer;M. Drikas

  • The evaluation of colour in natural waters

    Louise E. Bennett;Mary Drikas

  • Water treatment process

    Hung Van Nguyen;Donald Bruce Bursill;James Young Morran;Mary Drikas

  • Removal of organic contaminants from river and reservoir waters by three different aluminum-based metal salts: Coagulation adsorption and kinetics studies

    Sabir Hussain;John van Leeuwen;John van Leeuwen;Christopher Chow;Christopher Chow;Simon Beecham

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher W.K. Chow
Christopher W.K. Chow University of South Australia
Dongsheng Wang
Dongsheng Wang Chinese Academy of Sciences
Rose Amal
Rose Amal University of New South Wales
David Cook
David Cook University of Iceland
Gayle Newcombe
Gayle Newcombe South Australian Water Corporation
Paul Monis
Paul Monis University of South Australia
Gregory V. Korshin
Gregory V. Korshin University of Washington
Alan Cooper
Alan Cooper Charles Sturt University
Simon Beecham
Simon Beecham University of South Australia
David J. Chittleborough
David J. Chittleborough University of Adelaide

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degrees and career pathways. For those seeking flexible learning options, a cheap online general studies degree can provide a broad educational foundation, making it easier to later specialize in environmental topics.

If you're looking for a more focused career with less academic strain, some consider pursuing the easiest degree to get that still aligns well with environmental interests, such as certain geography or earth science programs.

Specialized fields like geoscience and geology offer strong pathways forward. Enrolling in a high-quality online geoscience degree program allows you to study Earth's processes remotely, preparing for roles in research, conservation, or resource management.

For advancing technical skills, pursuing one of the top GIS masters programs equips graduates with expertise in spatial data analysis, critical for environmental planning and management careers.

Best Scientists Citing Mary Drikas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles