World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 42 7378 7090 273 265 115 7258

Mary Drikas publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mary Drikas between 1988 and 2019, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mary Drikas published across 32 years, from 1988 to 2019, averaging 3.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2016. 7 of the 115 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2019. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2016. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 3 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 4 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 7 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 1 publication
1988 2019

115 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mary Drikas: publications per year, 1988 to 2019
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 4
1994 1
1995 3
1996 0
1997 3
1998 1
1999 4
2000 1
2001 1
2002 7
2003 2
2004 6
2005 2
2006 0
2007 2
2008 6
2009 5
2010 5
2011 9
2012 8
2013 8
2014 8
2015 6
2016 10
2017 5
2018 6
2019 1
Total 115
Download as CSV

Mary Drikas publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary Drikas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 115 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541 115
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Mary Drikas D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary Drikas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305 42
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Mary Drikas is affiliated with the South Australian Water Corporation in Australia. Their professional focus is connected to water management and related sectors, reflective of their institutional association.

There is no publicly listed record of recent papers, frequent co-authors, or dominant publication venues associated with this researcher. Similarly, no book publications or specific main fields and subfields of study have been documented in available sources.

Likewise, there are no records of awards or honors linked to Mary Drikas. The absence of these data suggests that publicly accessible research impact or recognition details may be limited or not broadly disseminated.

Without detailed information regarding research topics or specific academic contributions, a comprehensive analysis of their research focus remains unavailable. The affiliation with South Australian Water Corporation indicates a probable involvement in applied water resource management or infrastructure domains.

Best Publications

  • Influence of characterised natural organic material on activated carbon adsorption: II. Effect on pore volume distribution and adsorption of 2-methylisoborneol

    Gayle Newcombe;Mary Drikas;Rob Hayes

  • Granular activated carbon: Importance of surface properties in the adsorption of naturally occurring organics☆

    Gayle Newcombe;Rob Hayes;Mary Drikas

  • Comparison of NOM character in selected Australian and Norwegian drinking waters

    Rolando Fabris;Christopher W.K. Chow;Mary Drikas;Bjørnar Eikebrokk

  • The impact of conventional water treatment processes on cells of the cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa

    Christopher W.K Chow;Mary Drikas;Jenny House;Michael D Burch

  • Adsorption of NOM onto activated carbon: Electrostatic and non-electrostatic effects

    Unknown

  • Microcystin-LR adsorption by powdered activated carbon

    Cosimo Donati;Mary Drikas;Rob Hayes;Gayle Newcombe

  • Absorbance spectroscopy-based examination of effects of coagulation on the reactivity of fractions of natural organic matter with varying apparent molecular weights.

    Gregory Korshin;Christopher W.K. Chow;Rolando Fabris;Mary Drikas

  • Assessing natural organic matter treatability using high performance size exclusion chromatography.

    Christopher W.K. Chow;Rolando Fabris;John van Leeuwen;Dongsheng Wang

  • Using Coagulation, Flocculation, and Settling to Remove Toxic cyanobacteria

    Mary Drikas;Christopher W.K. Chow;Jenny House;Michael D. Burch

  • Pre-treatments to reduce fouling of low pressure micro-filtration (MF) membranes

    Rolando Fabris;Eun Kyung Lee;Christopher W.K. Chow;Vicki Chen

  • Removal of humic acid using TiO2 photocatalytic process--fractionation and molecular weight characterisation studies.

    Sanly Liu;May Lim;Rolando Fabris;Christopher Chow

  • A rapid fractionation technique to characterise natural organic matter for the optimisation of water treatment processes

    Christopher W. K. Chow;Rolando Fabris;Mary Drikas

  • Long term case study of MIEX pre-treatment in drinking water; understanding NOM removal

    Mary Drikas;Mike Dixon;Jim Morran

  • TiO2 Photocatalysis of Natural Organic Matter in Surface Water: Impact on Trihalomethane and Haloacetic Acid Formation Potential

    Sanly Liu;May Lim;Rolando Fabris;Christopher Chow

  • Optimised coagulation using aluminium sulfate for the removal of dissolved organic carbon

    Christopher W.K. Chow;John A. van Leeuwen;Rolando Fabris;Mary Drikas

  • The Impact of the Character of Natural Organic Matter in Conventional Treatment with Alum

    C. W. K. Chow;J. A. van Leeuwen;M. Drikas;R. Fabris

  • The impact of recalcitrant organic character on disinfection stability, trihalomethane formation and bacterial regrowth: An evaluation of magnetic ion exchange resin (MIEX®) and alum coagulation

    Mary Drikas;Christopher W. K. Chow;David Cook

  • Influence of characterised natural organic material on activated carbon adsorption: I. Characterisation of concentrated reservoir water

    Gayle Newcombe;Mary Drikas;Shoeleh Assemi;Ronald Beckett

  • THE EFFECT OF FERRIC CHLORIDE FLOCCULATION ON CYANOBACTERIAL CELLS

    C.W.K. Chow;J. House;R.M.A. Velzeboer;M. Drikas

  • The evaluation of colour in natural waters

    Louise E. Bennett;Mary Drikas

  • Water treatment process

    Hung Van Nguyen;Donald Bruce Bursill;James Young Morran;Mary Drikas

  • Removal of organic contaminants from river and reservoir waters by three different aluminum-based metal salts: Coagulation adsorption and kinetics studies

    Sabir Hussain;John van Leeuwen;John van Leeuwen;Christopher Chow;Christopher Chow;Simon Beecham

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher W.K. Chow
Christopher W.K. Chow University of South Australia
Dongsheng Wang
Dongsheng Wang Chinese Academy of Sciences
Rose Amal
Rose Amal University of New South Wales
David Cook
David Cook University of Iceland
Gayle Newcombe
Gayle Newcombe South Australian Water Corporation
Paul Monis
Paul Monis University of South Australia
Gregory V. Korshin
Gregory V. Korshin University of Washington
Alan Cooper
Alan Cooper Charles Sturt University
Simon Beecham
Simon Beecham University of South Australia
David J. Chittleborough
David J. Chittleborough University of Adelaide

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degrees and career pathways. For those seeking flexible learning options, a cheap online general studies degree can provide a broad educational foundation, making it easier to later specialize in environmental topics.

If you're looking for a more focused career with less academic strain, some consider pursuing the easiest degree to get that still aligns well with environmental interests, such as certain geography or earth science programs.

Specialized fields like geoscience and geology offer strong pathways forward. Enrolling in a high-quality online geoscience degree program allows you to study Earth's processes remotely, preparing for roles in research, conservation, or resource management.

For advancing technical skills, pursuing one of the top GIS masters programs equips graduates with expertise in spatial data analysis, critical for environmental planning and management careers.

Best Scientists Citing Mary Drikas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles