World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
48
Citations
8952
World Ranking
18353
National Ranking
1254

Martin Oppermann publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Oppermann sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 107 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Martin Oppermann D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Oppermann sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin Oppermann is affiliated with the University of Göttingen in Germany and conducts research primarily in the fields of Engineering, Medicine, and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their scholarly output spans several subfields, including Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering, Civil and Structural Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, and Surgery.

Their research encompasses a range of main topics:

  • Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
  • Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
  • Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
  • Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
  • Rock Mechanics and Modeling
  • Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

Martin Oppermann's recent publications illustrate the diversity of their research interests. These include:

  • "Semantic segmentation of the micro-structure of strain-hardening cement-based composites (SHCC) by applying deep learning on micro-computed tomography scans" (2020), published in Cement and Concrete Composites
  • "Metabolic engineering of Halomonas elongata: Ectoine secretion is increased by demand and supply driven approaches" (2022), published in Frontiers in Microbiology
  • "In-situ-Röntgenverfahren zur Messung von Verwindung und Wölbung elektronischer Komponenten während eines Lötvorgangs" (2020), published in tm - Technisches Messen
  • "Frontmatter" (2020), published in tm - Technisches Messen
  • "P.152 In-vivo accuracy of pedicle screws utilizing a supervisory controlled 7DOF robot with OCT guidance" (2024), published in Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques

Frequent coauthors in their work include Oliver Albrecht, Heinz Wohlrabe, Thomas Zerna, Ross Johnston, and Victor X. D. Yang, each collaborating on multiple publications.

Martin Oppermann's work has been published in several venues repeatedly, notably:

  • tm - Technisches Messen
  • Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques
  • Cement and Concrete Composites
  • Frontiers in Microbiology
  • IEEE Open Journal of Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control

Best Publications

  • Chemokine receptor CCR5: insights into structure, function, and regulation

    Martin Oppermann

  • Systemic Complement Activation in Age-Related Macular Degeneration

    Hendrik P N Scholl;Peter Charbel Issa;Maja Walier;Stefanie Janzer

  • Exosomal evasion of humoral immunotherapy in aggressive B-cell lymphoma modulated by ATP-binding cassette transporter A3

    Thiha Aung;Bjoern Chapuy;Bjoern Chapuy;Daniel Vogel;Dirk Wenzel

  • Phosphorylation of the Type 1A Angiotensin II Receptor by G Protein-coupled Receptor Kinases and Protein Kinase C

    Martin Oppermann;Neil J. Freedman;R. Wayne Alexander;Robert J. Lefkowitz

  • Anti–factor H autoantibodies block C-terminal recognition function of factor H in hemolytic uremic syndrome

    Mihály Józsi;Stefanie Strobel;Hans-Martin Dahse;Wei-shih Liu

  • Differential Effects of CC Chemokines on CC Chemokine Receptor 5 (CCR5) Phosphorylation and Identification of Phosphorylation Sites on the CCR5 Carboxyl Terminus

    Martin Oppermann;Matthias Mack;Amanda E.I. Proudfoot;Heike Olbrich

  • Phosphorylation and Desensitization of Human Endothelin A and B Receptors: EVIDENCE FOR G PROTEIN-COUPLED RECEPTOR KINASE SPECIFICITY *

    Neil J. Freedman;Alan S. Ament;Martin Oppermann;Robert H. Stoffel

  • C3a activates reactive oxygen radical species production and intracellular calcium transients in human eosinophils

    Jörn Elsner;Martin Oppermann;Wolfgang Czech;Gustav Dobos

  • An imbalance of human complement regulatory proteins CFHR1, CFHR3 and factor H influences risk for age-related macular degeneration (AMD)

    Lars G. Fritsche;Nadine Lauer;Andrea Hartmann;Selina Stippa

  • Characterization of Sequence Determinants within the Carboxyl- terminal Domain of Chemokine Receptor CCR5 That Regulate Signaling and Receptor Internalization*

    Katrin Kraft;Heike Olbrich;Irina Majoul;Matthias Mack

  • The contrasting mechanisms of serum resistance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and group B Neisseria meningitidis.

    S Ram;F.G Mackinnon;S Gulati;D.P McQuillen

  • The C‐terminus of complement regulator Factor H mediates target recognition: evidence for a compact conformation of the native protein

    M. Oppermann;T. Manuelian;M. Józsi;E. Brandt

  • Genetic control of the alternative pathway of complement in humans and age-related macular degeneration

    Laura A. Hecker;Albert O. Edwards;Euijung Ryu;Nirubol Tosakulwong

  • Antibody Blockade of CCL25/CCR9 Ameliorates Early but not Late Chronic Murine Ileitis

    Jesús Rivera-Nieves;Johnson Ho;Giorgos Bamias;Natalia Ivashkina

  • Complement activation in septic baboons detected by neoepitope‐specific assays for C3b/iC3b/C3c, C5a and the terminal C5b‐9 complement complex (TCC)

    T E Mollnes;H Redl;K Høgåsen;A Bengtsson

  • β-Arrestin Binding to CC Chemokine Receptor 5 Requires Multiple C-terminal Receptor Phosphorylation Sites and Involves a Conserved Asp-Arg-Tyr Sequence Motif

    Friederike Hüttenrauch;Antje Nitzki;Fang Tsyr Lin;Stefan Höning

  • The C5a receptor is expressed in normal renal proximal tubular but not in normal pulmonary or hepatic epithelial cells.

    A Fayyazi;O Scheel;T Werfel;S Schweyer

  • Probing the human receptor for C5a anaphylatoxin with site-directed antibodies. Identification of a potential ligand binding site on the NH2-terminal domain.

    M Oppermann;U Raedt;T Hebell;B Schmidt

  • Gene expression of interleukin-1β during hemodialysis

    Ralf Schindler;Silvia Linnenweber;Matthias Schulze;Martin Oppermann

  • Monoclonal antibodies reveal receptor specificity among G-protein-coupled receptor kinases.

    Martin Oppermann;María Diversé-Pierluissi;Mark H. Drazner;Sara L. Dyer

Frequent Co-Authors

Otto Götze
Otto Götze University of Göttingen
Peter F. Zipfel
Peter F. Zipfel Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Mihály Józsi
Mihály Józsi Eötvös Loránd University
Bernhard H. F. Weber
Bernhard H. F. Weber University of Regensburg
Christine Skerka
Christine Skerka Leibniz Association
Lars G. Fritsche
Lars G. Fritsche University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Thomas F. Wienker
Thomas F. Wienker Max Planck Society
Robert J. Lefkowitz
Robert J. Lefkowitz Duke University
Alexander Kapp
Alexander Kapp Hannover Medical School
Thomas Werfel
Thomas Werfel Hannover Medical School

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Biology or Biochemistry opens up diverse career opportunities in healthcare, nutrition, laboratory sciences, and research. Many students now prefer the flexibility of online programs, which allow them to balance studies with personal and professional commitments.

For those interested in nutrition, exploring the cheapest online nutrition degree options can make advanced education more accessible without compromising quality. Similarly, students seeking to work with imaging technologies may consider enrolling in online ultrasound tech programs or searching for the best online radiology tech programs to launch rewarding careers in medical diagnostics.

For those aiming to specialize in dietetics, reviewing the best dietitian programs can help in choosing the best pathway forward. These online options not only offer academic excellence but also bridge the gap to in-demand healthcare professions.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Oppermann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles