World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
32
Citations
12021
World Ranking
8541
National Ranking
59

Anne Mouchet publications per year

1985: 3 publications 1986: 1 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 1 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 1 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 1 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 1 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 1 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 4 publications
1985 2025

147 publications in total across all disciplines

Anne Mouchet publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anne Mouchet sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 603+

This scientist: 118 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

Anne Mouchet D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anne Mouchet sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anne Mouchet is affiliated with the University of Liège in Belgium and is an active researcher in Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Environmental Science. Their research spans several subfields including Atmospheric Science, Oceanography, Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, and Geochemistry and Petrology.

The scientist has contributed notably to topics such as Geology and Paleoclimatology Research, Isotope Analysis in Ecology, Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena, Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry, Marine and Coastal Ecosystems, Atmospheric Chemistry and Aerosols, and Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes.

Recent publications by Anne Mouchet include:

  • Consistent Boundary Conditions for Age Calculations, 2020, Water
  • Changes in Atmospheric CO2 Concentration Over the Past Two Millennia: Contribution of Climate Variability, Land-Use and Southern Ocean Dynamics, 2022, Climate Dynamics
  • Atmospheric Δ14C in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres Over the Past Two Millennia: Role of Production Rate, Southern Hemisphere Westerly Winds and Ocean Circulation Changes, 2024, Quaternary Science Reviews
  • Modelling the Water Isotope Distribution in the Mediterranean Sea Using a High-Resolution Oceanic Model (NEMO-MED12-watiso v1.0): Evaluation of Model Results Against In Situ Observations, 2024, Geoscientific Model Development
  • Deglaciation and Abrupt Events in a Coupled Comprehensive Atmosphere-Ocean-Ice-Sheet-Solid-Earth Model, 2025, Climate of the Past

Frequently collaborating coauthors include:

  • Hugues Goosse
  • Victor Brovkin
  • Katrin J. Meißner
  • Laurie Menviel
  • Mohamed Ayache

The regular venues where their work has appeared feature journals such as:

  • Water
  • Climate Dynamics
  • Quaternary Science Reviews
  • Geoscientific Model Development
  • Climate of the Past

Best Publications

  • Anthropogenic ocean acidification over the twenty-first century and its impact on calcifying organisms

    James C. Orr;Victoria J. Fabry;Olivier Aumont;Laurent Bopp

  • Oceanic sources, sinks, and transport of atmospheric CO2

    Nicolas Gruber;Manuel Gloor;Sara E. Mikaloff Fletcher;Scott C. Doney

  • Inverse estimates of anthropogenic CO2 uptake, transport, and storage by the ocean

    Mikaloff Fletcher;Mikaloff Fletcher;Nicolas Gruber;Andrew Jacobson;Scott Doney

  • Deepwater formation in the North Pacific during the Last Glacial Termination.

    Yusuke Okazaki;A. Timmermann;L. Menviel;N. Harada

  • Description of the Earth system model of intermediate complexity LOVECLIM version 1.2

    Hugues Goosse;Viktor Brovkin;Thierry Fichefet;R Haarsma

  • Evaluating Global Ocean Carbon Models: The Importance of Realistic Physics

    Scott C. Doney;Keith Lindsay;K. Caldeira;J.-M. Campin;J.-M. Campin

  • Impact of circulation on export production, dissolved organic matter, and dissolved oxygen in the ocean: Results from Phase II of the Ocean Carbon-cycle Model Intercomparison Project (OCMIP-2)

    Raymond G. Najjar;X. Jin;F. Louanchi;Olivier Aumont

  • Evaluation of ocean carbon cycle models with data-based metrics

    K. Matsumoto;Jorge L. Sarmiento;Robert M. Key;Olivier Aumont

  • Evaluation of ocean model ventilation with CFC-11: comparison of 13 global ocean models

    Jean-Claude Dutay;John L. Bullister;Scott C. Doney;James C. Orr

  • Long-term climate commitments projected with climate-carbon cycle models

    G.-K. Plattner;R. Knutti;F. Joos;T.F. Stocker

  • Biogeochemical protocols and diagnostics for the CMIP6 Ocean Model Intercomparison Project (OMIP)

    James C. Orr;Raymond G. Najjar;Olivier Aumont;Laurent Bopp

  • Inverse estimates of the oceanic sources and sinks of natural CO2 and the implied oceanic carbon transport

    S. E. Mikaloff Fletcher;S. E. Mikaloff Fletcher;N. Gruber;N. Gruber;A. R. Jacobson;A. R. Jacobson;M. Gloor;M. Gloor

  • Deconstructing the Last Glacial termination: the role of millennial and orbital-scale forcings

    L. Menviel;L. Menviel;A. Timmermann;O. Elison Timm;A. Mouchet

  • Modeling the Influence of Greenland Ice Sheet Melting on the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation During the Next Millennia

    Emmanualle Driesschaert;Thierry Fichefet;H. Goosse;Philippe Huybrechts

  • Meridional reorganizations of marine and terrestrial productivity during Heinrich events

    L. Menviel;Anne-Marie Timmermann;Anne Mouchet;O. Timm

  • Poorly ventilated deep ocean at the Last Glacial Maximum inferred from carbon isotopes: A data-model comparison study

    L Menviel;Jimin Yu;F. Joos;A.T. Mouchet;A.T. Mouchet;A.T. Mouchet

  • Detecting regional anthropogenic trends in ocean acidification against natural variability

    T. Friedrich;A. Timmermann;A. Abe-Ouchi;N. R. Bates

  • Atlantic‐Pacific seesaw and its role in outgassing CO2 during Heinrich events

    L Menviel;Matthew Heathcote England;K.J. Meissner;A.T. Mouchet;A.T. Mouchet

  • The role of ocean transport in the uptake of anthropogenic CO2

    L. Cao;M. Eby;A. Ridgwell;K. Caldeira

  • Climate and biogeochemical response to a rapid melting of the West-Antarctic Ice Sheet during interglacials and implications for future climate

    L. Menviel;A. Timmermann;O. Elison Timm;A. Mouchet

  • Description of the Earth system model of intermediate complexity LOVECLIM version 1.2

    H. Goosse;V. Brovkin;T. Fichefet;R. Haarsma

Frequent Co-Authors

Philippe Huybrechts
Philippe Huybrechts Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Fortunat Joos
Fortunat Joos University of Bern
Eric Deleersnijder
Eric Deleersnijder Université Catholique de Louvain
Axel Timmermann
Axel Timmermann Pusan National University
Laurie Menviel
Laurie Menviel University of New South Wales
Scott C. Doney
Scott C. Doney University of Virginia
Keith Lindsay
Keith Lindsay National Center for Atmospheric Research
Marie-France Loutre
Marie-France Loutre University of Bern
James C. Orr
James C. Orr French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA)
Jorge L. Sarmiento
Jorge L. Sarmiento Princeton University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens doors to diverse career opportunities and complementary fields of study. Many students explore related disciplines through flexible online programs that fit various lifestyles and career goals. For example, pursuing a bachelors in spanish online can enhance communication skills and open international job markets, beneficial for environmental consultants working globally.

Veterans interested in Earth Science might find tailored options such as a spanish degree online for veterans, which supports a smooth transition into civilian careers while leveraging military benefits.

Creative professionals often intersect with Earth Science fields, making programs like online mfa visual arts valuable for those aiming to communicate scientific concepts through visual storytelling or environmental design.

Additionally, managing natural resources and environmental projects requires strong leadership, where degrees such as the best online masters degree in human resource management programs can equip graduates with essential management skills for advancing their Earth Science careers.

Best Scientists Citing Anne Mouchet

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles