World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
42
Citations
10022
World Ranking
8242
National Ranking
496

Martin Neil publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Neil sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 129 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Martin Neil D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Neil sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin Neil is affiliated with Queen Mary University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily lies within the field of Computer Science, with a strong focus on Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Operations Research, Information Systems, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, and Sociology and Political Science.

Their work centers on topics including Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference, Risk and Safety Analysis, Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models, Machine Learning in Healthcare, COVID-19 epidemiological studies, COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing, and Data Quality and Management.

Among recent publications authored or co-authored by Martin Neil are:

  • "Bayesian network analysis of Covid-19 data reveals higher infection prevalence rates and lower fatality rates than widely reported," 2020, Journal of Risk Research
  • "Learning from Behavioural Changes That Fail," 2020, Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • "COVID-19 infection and death rates: the need to incorporate causal explanations for the data and avoid bias in testing," 2020, Journal of Risk Research
  • "Medical idioms for clinical Bayesian network development," 2020, Journal of Biomedical Informatics
  • "A privacy-preserving Bayesian network model for personalised COVID19 risk assessment and contact tracing," 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Martin Neil frequently collaborates with other researchers, including Norman Fenton, Scott McLachlan, Magda Osman, Evangelia Kyrimi, and Joshua L. Hunte.

Their published work appears in a variety of academic venues, most commonly in the following:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Risk Research
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Best Publications

  • A critique of software defect prediction models

    N.E. Fenton;M. Neil

  • Risk Assessment and Decision Analysis with Bayesian Networks

    Norman Fenton;Martin Neil

  • Software metrics: roadmap

    Norman E. Fenton;Martin Neil

  • An Introduction to Bayesian Networks

    Martin Neil;So p

  • Building large-scale Bayesian networks

    Martin Neil;Norman Fenton;Lars Nielson

  • Software metrics: success, failures and new directions

    Norman E. Fenton;Martin Neil

  • Using Ranked Nodes to Model Qualitative Judgments in Bayesian Networks

    Norman E. Fenton;Martin Neil;Jose Galan Caballero

  • Predicting software defects in varying development lifecycles using Bayesian nets

    Norman Fenton;Martin Neil;William Marsh;Peter Hearty

  • Software measurement: uncertainty and causal modeling

    N. Fenton;P. Krause;M. Neil

  • A General Structure for Legal Arguments about Evidence Using Bayesian Networks.

    Norman E. Fenton;Martin Neil;David A. Lagnado

  • Using Bayesian networks to model expected and unexpected operational losses.

    Martin Neil;Norman Fenton;Manesh Tailor

  • Inference in hybrid Bayesian networks using dynamic discretization

    Martin Neil;Manesh Tailor;David Marquez

  • Predicting football results using Bayesian nets and other machine learning techniques

    A. Joseph;N. E. Fenton;M. Neil

  • pi-football: A Bayesian network model for forecasting Association Football match outcomes

    Anthony C. Constantinou;Norman E. Fenton;Martin Neil

  • Making decisions: using Bayesian nets and MCDA

    Norman E. Fenton;Martin Neil

  • Improved reliability modeling using Bayesian networks and dynamic discretization

    David Marquez;Martin Neil;Norman E. Fenton

  • Making resource decisions for software projects

    Norman Fenton;William Marsh;Martin Neil;Patrick Cates

  • On the effectiveness of early life cycle defect prediction with Bayesian Nets

    Norman Fenton;Martin Neil;William Marsh;Peter Hearty

  • Using Bayesian belief networks to predict the reliability of military vehicles

    M. Neil;N. Fenton;S. Forey;R. Harris

  • Project Scheduling: Improved Approach to Incorporate Uncertainty Using Bayesian Networks:

    Vahid Khodakarami;Norman Fenton;Martin Neil

Frequent Co-Authors

Norman Fenton
Norman Fenton Queen Mary University of London
David A. Lagnado
David A. Lagnado University College London
Graham A. Hitman
Graham A. Hitman Queen Mary University of London
Richard D. Gill
Richard D. Gill Leiden University
Bev Littlewood
Bev Littlewood City, University of London
Peter J. F. Lucas
Peter J. F. Lucas University of Twente
David J. Balding
David J. Balding University of Melbourne
Eike Luedeling
Eike Luedeling University of Bonn
Keith D. Shepherd
Keith D. Shepherd World Agroforestry Centre
Timothy M. Hospedales
Timothy M. Hospedales University of Edinburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Computer Science opens doors to countless opportunities, both in the tech industry and beyond. For many students, flexibility and affordability are top concerns. Thankfully, there are many cheapest online degrees in Computer Science, making high-quality education accessible without breaking the bank.

Worried about your GPA? Don’t be discouraged—numerous online schools that accept low gpa can help you pursue your dreams, regardless of your academic background. Accelerated options are another pathway; some of the fastest computer science degree programs online let you graduate and enter the workforce sooner.

Additionally, the versatility of a Computer Science degree means you’re not limited to just one field. If you’re also interested in interdisciplinary careers, you might wonder, what can i do with an environmental science degree? Many roles now blend tech skills with environmental or other specialized fields, expanding your career possibilities even further.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Neil

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles