World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
51
Citations
9107
World Ranking
17195
National Ranking
492

Mark L. Tamplin publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark L. Tamplin sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 215 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Mark L. Tamplin D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark L. Tamplin sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark L. Tamplin is affiliated with the University of Tasmania in Australia. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a particular focus on Food Science and Biotechnology. Subfields of study include Molecular Biology, Animal Science and Zoology, and Plant Science.

Their work addresses key topics such as Listeria monocytogenes in food safety, Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology, meat and animal product quality, polyamine metabolism and applications, protein hydrolysis and bioactive peptides, food safety and hygiene, and Vibrio bacteria research studies.

Mark L. Tamplin has published research in several prominent venues, with frequent contributions to Food Microbiology and the International Journal of Food Microbiology. Other venues include the Journal of Food Science, SSRN Electronic Journal, and Food Chemistry.

  • Effects of ultrasound-assisted slightly acidic electrolyzed water thawing on myofibrillar protein conformation and gel properties of chicken breasts (2022, Food Chemistry)
  • Effect of glucose, pH and lactic acid on Carnobacterium maltaromaticum, Brochothrix thermosphacta and Serratia liquefaciens within a commercial heat-shrunk vacuum-package film (2020, Food Microbiology)
  • Effect of peroxyacetic acid treatment and bruising on the bacterial community and shelf-life of baby spinach (2021, International Journal of Food Microbiology)
  • Detection, quantification, and characterization of Salmonella enterica in mango, tomato, and raw chicken purchased in the central region of Mexico (2021, Journal of Food Science)
  • Modelling viability of Listeria monocytogenes in paneer (2021, Food Microbiology)

Frequent collaborators include John P. Bowman, Shane M. Powell, David A. Ratkowsky, T Ross, and Angélica Godínez-Oviedo.

Best Publications

  • Effects of temperature and salinity on the survival of Vibrio vulnificus in seawater and shellfish

    C W Kaspar;M L Tamplin

  • Attachment of Vibrio cholerae serogroup O1 to zooplankton and phytoplankton of Bangladesh waters.

    M L Tamplin;A L Gauzens;A Huq;D A Sack

  • Discriminant Analysis of Ribotype Profiles of Escherichia coli for Differentiating Human and Nonhuman Sources of Fecal Pollution

    Salina Parveen;Kenneth M. Portier;Kevin Robinson;Lee Edmiston

  • Association of multiple-antibiotic-resistance profiles with point and nonpoint sources of Escherichia coli in Apalachicola Bay

    Salina Parveen;Rendi L. Murphree;Lee Edmiston;Charles W. Kaspar

  • ComBase: a common database on microbial responses to food environments.

    József Baranyi;Mark L. Tamplin

  • Isolation and characterization of Vibrio vulnificus from two Florida estuaries.

    M. Tamplin;G. E. Rodrick;N. J. Blake;T. Cuba

  • A tissue culture assay for tetrodotoxin, saxitoxin and related toxins.

    Kazuhiro Kogure;Mark L. Tamplin;Usio Simidu;Rita R. Colwell

  • Seasonal distribution of total and pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Chesapeake Bay oysters and waters

    Salina Parveen;Kumidini A. Hettiarachchi;John C. Bowers;Jessica L. Jones

  • Natural Sources and Properties of Chemical Inducers Mediating Settlement of Oyster Larvae: A Re-examination.

    M. N. Tamburri;R. K. Zimmer-Faust;M. L. Tamplin

  • The fate of enteric pathogenic bacteria in estuarine and marine environments.

    Grimes Dj;Atwell Rw;Brayton Pr;Palmer Lm

  • Geographical Variation in Ribotype Profiles of Escherichia coli Isolates from Humans, Swine, Poultry, Beef, and Dairy Cattle in Florida

    Troy M. Scott;Salina Parveen;Kenneth M. Portier;Joan B. Rose

  • Persistence of Vibrio vulnificus in tissues of Gulf Coast oysters, Crassostrea virginica, exposed to seawater disinfected with UV light.

    M L Tamplin;G M Capers

  • Enumeration of Vibrio cholerae O1 in Bangladesh waters by fluorescent-antibody direct viable count.

    P R Brayton;M L Tamplin;A Huq;R R Colwell

  • Removal of microorganisms from water by columns containing sand coated with ferric and aluminum hydroxides

    Jerzy Lukasik;Yueh-Fung Cheng;Fuhua Lu;Mark Tamplin

  • Pyrosequencing-based characterization of gastrointestinal bacteria of Atlantic salmon ( Salmo salar L.) within a commercial mariculture system

    K.Z. Zarkasi;K.Z. Zarkasi;G.C.J. Abell;R.S. Taylor;C. Neuman

  • Atlantic Salmon ( Salmo salar L.) Gastrointestinal Microbial Community Dynamics in Relation to Digesta Properties and Diet

    Kamarul Zaman Zarkasi;Richard S. Taylor;Guy C. J. Abell;Mark L. Tamplin

  • The future of predictive microbiology: strategic research, innovative applications and great expectations.

    Thomas A. McMeekin;John Bowman;Olivia McQuestin;Lundal Mellefont

  • High-throughput sequencing of microbial communities in Poro cheese, an artisanal Mexican cheese.

    Alejandro Aldrete-Tapia;Meyli C. Escobar-Ramírez;Mark L. Tamplin;Montserrat Hernández-Iturriaga

  • Evidence that mortality from Vibrio vulnificus infection results from single strains among heterogeneous populations in shellfish.

    J K Jackson;R L Murphree;M L Tamplin

  • Comparison of cultivation and PCR-hybridization for detection of Salmonella in porcine fecal and water samples.

    Ingrid Feder;Ingrid Feder;Jerome C. Nietfeld;John Galland;Teresa Yeary

Frequent Co-Authors

Tom Ross
Tom Ross University of Tasmania
John P. Bowman
John P. Bowman University of Tasmania
John B. Luchansky
John B. Luchansky United States Department of Agriculture
Rita R. Colwell
Rita R. Colwell University of Maryland, College Park
Tom A. McMeekin
Tom A. McMeekin University of Tasmania
Brett D. Glencross
Brett D. Glencross University of Stirling
Angelo DePaola
Angelo DePaola Angelo DePaola's Consulting, LLC
Vijay K. Juneja
Vijay K. Juneja United States Department of Agriculture
Martin Wiedmann
Martin Wiedmann Cornell University
Alieta Eyles
Alieta Eyles University of Tasmania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens the door to a range of specialized career pathways. Today, many students can access advanced education entirely online, making it easier to balance learning with professional or personal commitments.

For those interested in leadership roles in healthcare, the best doctorate of healthcare administration programs offer advanced training in healthcare policy, management, and organizational leadership. If your passion lies in the pharmaceutical sciences, consider an online pharm d programs to prepare for a rewarding pharmacy career.

Many students are also discovering opportunities in fitness and allied health. The best online exercise science degree programs combine the study of biology with applied human movement, ideal for those pursuing sports science or personal training careers. Alternatively, online kinesiology degrees focus on the mechanics of body movement and rehabilitation sciences.

These online degree options allow you to specialize and advance in a variety of health, science, and wellness careers—making them valuable complements to Biology and Biochemistry studies.

Best Scientists Citing Mark L. Tamplin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles