World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Marita Falkmer

Marita Falkmer

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 35 9885 9252 566 552 114 4983

Marita Falkmer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marita Falkmer between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marita Falkmer published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 4.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2015. 3 of the 117 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2015. 2001: 2 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 4 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 6 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 2 publications
2001 2025

117 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marita Falkmer: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 2
2002 0
2003 0
2004 1
2005 0
2006 1
2007 0
2008 0
2009 0
2010 1
2011 4
2012 3
2013 6
2014 12
2015 18
2016 11
2017 11
2018 10
2019 13
2020 7
2021 7
2022 1
2023 6
2024 1
2025 2
Total 117
Download as CSV

Marita Falkmer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marita Falkmer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 114 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 114
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Marita Falkmer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marita Falkmer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 35
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Marita Falkmer is affiliated with Curtin University in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on the intersections of psychology and neuroscience, with notable contributions to clinical psychology and cognitive neuroscience.

Their main research areas cover:

  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Family and Disability Support Research
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Disability Education and Employment

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Marita Falkmer include:

  • Sonya Girdler
  • Sven Bölte
  • Melissa H. Black
  • Tele Tan
  • Benjamin Milbourn

Their work has appeared in a variety of academic journals, with multiple publications in:

  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
  • Autism in Adulthood
  • Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy
  • Autism Research
  • Education Sciences

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Marita Falkmer include:

  • "Multi-informant International Perspectives on the Facilitators and Barriers to Employment for Autistic Adults," 2020, Autism Research
  • "We Can See a Bright Future": Parents' Perceptions of the Outcomes of Participating in a Strengths-Based Program for Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder," 2020, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
  • Creating Inclusive Schools for Autistic Students: A Scoping Review on Elements Contributing to Strengths-Based Approaches, 2023, Education Sciences
  • Identifying the Essential Components of Strength-based Technology Clubs for Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder, 2021, Developmental Neurorehabilitation
  • KONTAKT® social skills group training for Australian adolescents with autism spectrum disorder: a randomized controlled trial, 2021, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Marita Falkmer's publication record reflects a strong engagement with autism spectrum disorder and related fields, contributing to research on employment, education, and psychosocial development. Their work spans both foundational psychological theories and applications to developmental and disability support contexts.

Best Publications

  • Diagnostic procedures in autism spectrum disorders: a systematic literature review

    Torbjörn Falkmer;Katie Anderson;Marita Falkmer;Marita Falkmer;Chiara Horlin

  • Factors associated with primary school teachers' attitudes towards the inclusion of students with disabilities

    Sharmila Vaz;Nathan Wilson;Marita Falkmer;Angela Sim

  • The Cost of Autism Spectrum Disorders

    Chiara Horlin;Marita Falkmer;Richard Parsons;Matthew A. Albrecht

  • Mechanisms of facial emotion recognition in autism spectrum disorders: Insights from eye tracking and electroencephalography

    Melissa H. Black;Melissa H. Black;Nigel T.M. Chen;Nigel T.M. Chen;Nigel T.M. Chen;Kartik K. Iyer;Ottmar V. Lipp;Ottmar V. Lipp

  • Factors impacting employment for people with autism spectrum disorder: A scoping review:

    Melissa Scott;Ben Milbourn;Marita Falkmer;Marita Falkmer;Marita Falkmer;Melissa Black;Melissa Black

  • Employers' perception of the costs and the benefits of hiring individuals with autism spectrum disorder in open employment in Australia.

    Melissa Scott;Melissa Scott;Andrew Jacob;Delia Hendrie;Richard Parsons

  • Viewpoints on Factors for Successful Employment for Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder

    Melissa Scott;Marita Falkmer;Sonya Girdler;Torbjörn Falkmer

  • Looking through the Same Eyes? Do Teachers’ Participation Ratings Match with Ratings of Students with Autism Spectrum Conditions in Mainstream Schools?

    Marita Falkmer;Richard Parsons;Mats Granlund

  • Parents' Perspectives on Inclusive Schools for Children with Autism Spectrum Conditions.

    Marita Falkmer;Katie Anderson;Annette Joosten;Torbjörn Falkmer

  • Success Factors Enabling Employment for Adults on the Autism Spectrum from Employers’ Perspective

    Jessica Dreaver;Craig Thompson;Sonya Girdler;Margareta Adolfsson

  • The Costs and Benefits of Employing an Adult with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review

    Andrew Jacob;Melissa Scott;Marita Falkmer;Torbjörn Falkmer

  • Face Recognition and Visual Search Strategies in Autism Spectrum Disorders: Amending and Extending a Recent Review by Weigelt et al.

    Julia Tang;Marita Falkmer;Chiara Horlin;Tele Tan

  • Differences in the use of vision and proprioception for postural control in autism spectrum disorder.

    Susan L. Morris;Christopher J. Foster;Richard Parsons;Marita Falkmer

  • Multi-informant International Perspectives on the Facilitators and Barriers to Employment for Autistic Adults.

    Melissa H. Black;Soheil Mahdi;Benjamin Milbourn;Melissa Scott

  • Community participation interventions for children and adolescents with a neurodevelopmental intellectual disability: A systematic review

    Jaimi Andrews;Marita Falkmer;Sonya Girdler

  • “We Can See a Bright Future”: Parents’ Perceptions of the Outcomes of Participating in a Strengths-Based Program for Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder

    Elinda Ai Lim Lee;Melissa H. Black;Marita Falkmer;Marita Falkmer;Tele Tan

  • Perspectives of key stakeholders on employment of autistic adults across the united states, australia, and sweden

    Melissa H. Black;Soheil Mahdi;Benjamin Milbourn;Craig Thompson

  • Linking knowledge and attitudes: Determining neurotypical knowledge about and attitudes towards autism.

    Rebecca Kuzminski;Julie Netto;Joel Wilson;Torbjorn Falkmer;Torbjorn Falkmer;Torbjorn Falkmer

  • From my perspective - Perceived participation in mainstream schools in students with autism spectrum conditions

    Marita Falkmer;Mats Granlund;Claes Nilholm;Torbjörn Falkmer

  • Factors influencing the research participation of adults with autism spectrum disorders

    Kaaren Haas;Debra Costley;Marita Falkmer;Amanda Richdale

Frequent Co-Authors

Torbjörn Falkmer
Torbjörn Falkmer Curtin University
Sonya Girdler
Sonya Girdler Curtin University
Sven Bölte
Sven Bölte Karolinska Institute
Mats Granlund
Mats Granlund Jönköping University
Mirko Uljarević
Mirko Uljarević University of Melbourne
Andrew J. O. Whitehouse
Andrew J. O. Whitehouse Telethon Kids Institute
Amanda L. Richdale
Amanda L. Richdale La Trobe University
Julian N. Trollor
Julian N. Trollor University of New South Wales
Ottmar V. Lipp
Ottmar V. Lipp Curtin University
Valsamma Eapen
Valsamma Eapen University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens doors to many rewarding career pathways, especially for those aiming to become licensed therapists. Requirements to practice as a therapist can vary significantly depending on location. For instance, individuals interested in how to become a licensed therapist in Minneapolis must follow guidelines unique to Minnesota, including specific educational credentials, supervised experience, and passing national examinations.

Similarly, licensed therapist requirements in Nashville include state-approved degree programs, post-degree work hours, and licensure exams tailored to Tennessee law. Aspiring professionals in Louisiana need to be aware of licensed therapist requirements in New Orleans, where both coursework specifics and supervised practice play a major role.

For those looking towards larger metropolitan areas, New York City licensed therapist requirements are among the most rigorous, demanding extensive education, fieldwork, and continuing education. Regardless of your location, pursuing an accredited online psychology degree can be a strong foundation for meeting local licensure requirements and launching a fulfilling career in mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Marita Falkmer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles