World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Marcelo T. Berlim

Marcelo T. Berlim

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 48 5930 5513 407 381 107 9370

Marcelo T. Berlim publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marcelo T. Berlim between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marcelo T. Berlim published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2003. 2 of the 114 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2003. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 24 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 2 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 1 publication
2000 2025

114 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marcelo T. Berlim: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 2
2002 1
2003 24
2004 4
2005 4
2006 3
2007 7
2008 4
2009 7
2010 4
2011 3
2012 2
2013 11
2014 9
2015 10
2016 2
2017 6
2018 1
2019 2
2020 3
2021 2
2022 0
2023 0
2024 1
2025 1
Total 114
Download as CSV

Marcelo T. Berlim publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcelo T. Berlim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 107 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 107
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Marcelo T. Berlim D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcelo T. Berlim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 48
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Marcelo T. Berlim is affiliated with McGill University in Canada and focuses their research on neuroscience and medicine. Their work spans multiple subfields including cognitive neuroscience, biological psychiatry, experimental and cognitive psychology, pharmacology, and neurology.

The scientist's research addresses key topics such as functional brain connectivity studies, tryptophan and brain disorders, mental health research, treatment of major depression, receptor mechanisms and signaling, neuropeptides, and transcranial magnetic stimulation studies.

Recent publications by Marcelo T. Berlim and associated researchers include:

  • The network structure of core depressive symptom-domains in major depressive disorder following antidepressant treatment, 2020, Psychological Medicine
  • GPR56/ADGRG1 is associated with response to antidepressant treatment, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis: La Stimulation Magnétique Transcrânienne Répétitive Pour le Traitement du Trouble de Stress Post-Traumatique: Une Revue Systématique et une Méta-Analyse en Réseau, 2020, The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
  • Balance Problems, Paralysis, and Angina as Clinical Markers for Severity in Major Depression, 2020, Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • The impact of antidepressant treatment on the network structure of neurocognition and core emotional depressive symptoms among depressed individuals with a history of suicide attempt: An 8-week clinical study, 2024, Journal of Affective Disorders

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers, notably Stéphane Richard-Devantoy, Gustavo Turecki, Raoul Belzeaux, Victor Gorgievski, and Laura M. Fiori.

Marcelo T. Berlim's research is regularly published in journals such as:

  • Nature Communications
  • Psychological Medicine
  • The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Journal of Affective Disorders

Best Publications

  • Response, remission and drop-out rates following high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treating major depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind and sham-controlled trials

    M. T. Berlim;F. van den Eynde;S. Tovar-Perdomo;Z. J. Daskalakis

  • Definition, assessment, and staging of treatment-resistant refractory major depression : A review of current concepts and methods

    Marcelo T Berlim;Gustavo Turecki

  • Four studies on how past and current suicidality relate even when "everything but the kitchen sink" is covaried.

    Thomas E. Joiner Jr.;Yeates Conwell;Kathleen Kara Fitzpatrick;Tracy K. Witte

  • A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of ketamine in the rapid treatment of major depressive episodes

    A. McGirr;M. T. Berlim;David J Bond;M. P. Fleck

  • Clinically meaningful efficacy and acceptability of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treating primary major depression: a meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind and sham-controlled trials.

    Marcelo T Berlim;Frederique Van den Eynde;Z Jeff Daskalakis

  • Transcranial direct current stimulation for major depression: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

    Pedro Shiozawa;Felipe Fregni;Isabela M. Benseñor;Paulo A. Lotufo

  • A meta-analysis of neuropsychological markers of vulnerability to suicidal behavior in mood disorders.

    S. Richard-Devantoy;M. T. Berlim;F. Jollant

  • What is the meaning of treatment resistant/refractory major depression (TRD)? A systematic review of current randomized trials.

    Marcelo T. Berlim;Gustavo Turecki

  • Current psychiatric morbidity, aggression/impulsivity, and personality dimensions in child and adolescent suicide: A case-control study

    Johanne Renaud;Marcelo T. Berlim;Alexander McGirr;Michel Tousignant

  • Clinical utility of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for treating major depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind and sham-controlled trials

    Marcelo T. Berlim;Marcelo T. Berlim;Frederique Van den Eynde;Frederique Van den Eynde;Z. Jeff Daskalakis;Z. Jeff Daskalakis

  • Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD): An Exploratory Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Sham-Controlled Trials

    Marcelo T. Berlim;Nicholas H. Neufeld;Frederique Van den Eynde

  • "Quality of life": a brand new concept for research and practice in psychiatry.

    Marcelo Turkienicz Berlim;Marcelo Pio de Almeida Fleck

  • Reliability and validity of the WHOQOL BREF in a sample of Brazilian outpatients with major depression.

    Marcelo T. Berlim;Daniele P. Pavanello;Marco A. K. Caldieraro;Marcelo P. A. Fleck

  • A systematic meta-review of predictors of antidepressant treatment outcome in major depressive disorder.

    Kelly Perlman;David Benrimoh;Sonia Israel;Colleen Rollins

  • A systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and acceptability of bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treating major depression

    M. T. Berlim;F. Van den Eynde;Z. J. Daskalakis

  • Structural magnetic resonance imaging in eating disorders: a systematic review of voxel-based morphometry studies

    Frederique Van den Eynde;Masashi Suda;Hannah Broadbent;Sébastien Guillaume;Sébastien Guillaume

  • Medial prefrontal cortex activity during memory encoding of pictures and its relation to symptomatic improvement after citalopram treatment in patients with major depression

    Martin Roy;Philippe-Olivier Harvey;Marcelo T. Berlim;Firoza Mamdani

  • Dysregulation of the sympathetic nervous system, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and executive function in individuals at risk for suicide.

    Alexander McGirr;Gabriel Diaconu;Marcelo T. Berlim;Jens C. Pruessner

  • Current trends in the assessment and somatic treatment of resistant/refractory major depression: An overview

    Marcelo T. Berlim;Marcelo P. Fleck;Gustavo Turecki

  • EFFICACY AND ACCEPTABILITY OF HIGH FREQUENCY REPETITIVE TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION (rTMS) VERSUS ELECTROCONVULSIVE THERAPY (ECT) FOR MAJOR DEPRESSION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META‐ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS

    Marcelo T. Berlim;Frederique Van den Eynde;Zafiris J. Daskalakis

  • Epigenetic regulation of BDNF expression according to antidepressant response.

    Lopez Jp;Mamdani F;Labonte B;Beaulieu Mm

Frequent Co-Authors

Marcelo Pio de Almeida Fleck
Marcelo Pio de Almeida Fleck Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
Alexander McGirr
Alexander McGirr University of Calgary
Gustavo Turecki
Gustavo Turecki Douglas Mental Health University Institute
Ivan Izquierdo
Ivan Izquierdo Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul
Fabrice Jollant
Fabrice Jollant University of Paris-Saclay
Mario Francisco Juruena
Mario Francisco Juruena King's College London
Thomas E. Joiner
Thomas E. Joiner Florida State University
Martin Lepage
Martin Lepage Douglas Mental Health University Institute
Lakshmi N. Yatham
Lakshmi N. Yatham University of British Columbia
Zafiris J. Daskalakis
Zafiris J. Daskalakis University of California - San Diego School of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens up diverse educational and career options, especially with the rise of flexible online degrees. Many students interested in behavioral health pursue applied behavior analysis programs online to prepare for specialized roles helping individuals with behavioral challenges.

For those looking to fast-track their studies, there are accelerated degree programs online that allow students to complete their psychology education in a shorter time frame without sacrificing quality.

Aspiring clinical psychologists should consider enrolling in apa accredited online clinical psychology programs. These rigorous, recognized programs give graduates a competitive edge for licensure and clinical practice.

Another prominent pathway is the Doctor of Psychology degree, which is available through innovative apa-accredited hybrid psyd programs. These blend online coursework with in-person training, meeting APA standards while providing flexibility.

Online and hybrid programs can help students balance life and studies, while also opening doors to meaningful psychology careers across healthcare, education, and research.

Best Scientists Citing Marcelo T. Berlim

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles