World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
42
Citations
31425
World Ranking
4297
National Ranking
58

Molecular Biology

D-Index
42
Citations
31425
World Ranking
2992
National Ranking
39

Marc Zabeau publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc Zabeau sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 83 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Marc Zabeau D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc Zabeau sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marc Zabeau is affiliated with Ghent University in Belgium. The academic profile does not list specific research papers, co-authors, or publication venues associated with their work. There is also no detailed information on the main or subfields of study, nor particular research topics addressed.

Despite the lack of detailed data about Marc Zabeau's research outputs or their specific scientific focus, their association with Ghent University situates them within an established academic institution known for various scientific disciplines. This affiliation suggests involvement in research activities typical of a university setting.

No book publications or awards are recorded for Marc Zabeau in the provided data. There is also no indication that they are deceased, so current or ongoing contributions to their field are possible though not specified here.

Best Publications

  • AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting.

    Pieter Vos;Rene Hogers;Marjo Bleeker;Martin Reijans

  • Transgenic plants protected from insect attack

    Mark Vaeck;Arlette Reynaerts;Herman Höfte;Stefan Jansens

  • Visualization of differential gene expression using a novel method of RNA fingerprinting based on AFLP : Analysis of gene expression during potato tuber development

    C.W.B. Bachem;R.S. van der Hoeven;S.M. de Bruijn;D. Vreugdenhil

  • Quantitative high-throughput analysis of DNA methylation patterns by base-specific cleavage and mass spectrometry

    Mathias Ehrich;Matthew R. Nelson;Patrick Stanssens;Marc Zabeau

  • Evaluation of the DNA fingerprinting method AFLP as a new tool in bacterial taxonomy

    Paul Janssen;Renata Coopman;Geert Huys;Jean Swings

  • The hidden duplication past of Arabidopsis thaliana

    Cedric Simillion;Klaas Vandepoele;Marc C. E. Van Montagu;Marc Zabeau

  • A functional genomics approach toward the understanding of secondary metabolism in plant cells

    Alain Goossens;Suvi T. Häkkinen;Into Laakso;Tuulikki Seppänen-Laakso

  • Efficient oligonucleotide-directed construction of mutations in expression vectors by the gapped duplex DNA method using alternating selectable markers

    Patrick Stanssens;Chris Opsomer;Yvonne M. McKeown;Wilfried Kramer

  • Dissection of the fusarium I2 gene cluster in tomato reveals six homologs and one active gene copy.

    Guus Simons;John Groenendijk;Jelle Wijbrandi;Martin Reijans

  • The tomato Mi-1 gene confers resistance to both root-knot nematodes and potato aphids

    P Vos;G Simons;T Jesse;J Wijbrandi

  • Catalase deficiency drastically affects gene expression induced by high light in Arabidopsis thaliana.

    Steven Vandenabeele;Sandy Vanderauwera;Marnik Vuylsteke;Stephane Rombauts

  • A comprehensive analysis of hydrogen peroxide-induced gene expression in tobacco

    Steven Vandenabeele;Katrien Van Der Kelen;James F Dat;Ilya Gadjev

  • Versatile Gene-Specific Sequence Tags for Arabidopsis Functional Genomics: Transcript Profiling and Reverse Genetics Applications

    Pierre Hilson;Joke Allemeersch;Thomas Altmann;Sébastien Aubourg

  • Identification of amplified restriction fragment polymorphism (AFLP) markers tightly linked to the tomato Cf-9 gene for resistance to Cladosporium fulvum

    Colwyn M. Thomas;Pieter Vos;Marc Zabeau;David A. Jones

  • Structural and functional analysis of a cloned delta endotoxin of Bacillus thuringiensis berliner 1715

    Herman Höfte;Henri de Greve;Jef Seurinck;Stefan Jansens

  • Two high-density AFLP linkage maps of Zea mays L.: analysis of distribution of AFLP markers.

    Marnik Vuylsteke;R Mank;R Antonise;E Bastiaans

  • A high-resolution map of the vicinity of the R1 locus on chromosome V of potato based on RFLP and AFLP markers

    Khalid Meksem;Dario Leister;Johan Peleman;Marc Zabeau

  • PCR-based fingerprinting using AFLPs as a tool for studying genetic relationships in Lactuca spp

    M. Hill;H. Witsenboer;M. Zabeau;P. Vos

  • Enhanced expression of cro-beta-galactosidase fusion proteins under the control of the PR promoter of bacteriophage lambda.

    M. Zabeau;K.K. Stanley

  • Quantitative cDNA-AFLP analysis for genome-wide expression studies

    Peter Breyne;Rozemarijn Dreesen;Bernard Cannoot;Debbie Rombaut

Frequent Co-Authors

Dirk Inzé
Dirk Inzé Ghent University
Marnik Vuylsteke
Marnik Vuylsteke Ghent University
Frank Van Breusegem
Frank Van Breusegem Ghent University
Jacques Mahillon
Jacques Mahillon Université Catholique de Louvain
Paul Van Hummelen
Paul Van Hummelen Harvard University
Stephane Rombauts
Stephane Rombauts Ghent University
Herman Höfte
Herman Höfte University of Paris-Saclay
Dirk van den Boom
Dirk van den Boom Sequenom (United States)
Pierre Rouzé
Pierre Rouzé Ghent University
Klaas Vandepoele
Klaas Vandepoele Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Molecular Biology provides a solid gateway to diverse health and science careers. Many students with this background consider transitioning to applied fields in healthcare and allied health. For example, those interested in communication sciences can look into speech pathology bridge programs designed for non-SLP majors. These programs allow science graduates to pivot into speech-language pathology and help fill crucial roles in healthcare settings.

Another popular path is nursing. If you lack a nursing background but wish to enter the field, online bsn programs for non nurses offer a fast-track route to becoming a registered nurse. Graduates can then pursue advanced roles, such as nurse practitioner. Those aiming for mental health fields may be curious about compensation; check out the dnp psychiatric nurse practitioner salary statistics to understand earning potential.

Molecular Biology graduates who want to move quickly into advanced practice roles should also learn about how to become a nurse practitioner. Many of these career pathways can be accessed with the right bridge program or accelerated online degree, making it easier than ever to diversify your professional future.

Best Scientists Citing Marc Zabeau