World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Leszek Rychlewski

Leszek Rychlewski

Award Badge
Biology and Biochemistry
Poland
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
59
Citations
14415
World Ranking
12406
National Ranking
13

Leszek Rychlewski publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leszek Rychlewski sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 157 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Leszek Rychlewski D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leszek Rychlewski sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Biology and Biochemistry in Poland Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Biology and Biochemistry in Poland Leader Award

Overview

Leszek Rychlewski is affiliated with the BioInfoBank Institute in Poland, where they contribute to research primarily in the fields of Immunology and Microbiology, Medicine, and Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology.

Their research covers several subfields, including Immunology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Biotechnology. They focus on topics such as Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins, Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research, and Microbial Inactivation Methods.

Among their recent publications, the following paper is noted:

  • Recombinant immunotoxin targeting GPC3 is cytotoxic to H466 small cell lung cancer cells, 2021, Oncology Letters

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Leszek Rychlewski include:

  • Ewelina Rodakowska
  • Aurelia Walczak-Drzewiecka
  • M. Borowiec
  • Michał Gorzkiewicz
  • Joanna Grzesik

The primary venue for their published work is Oncology Letters.

Best Publications

  • The Phaeodactylum genome reveals the evolutionary history of diatom genomes

    Chris Bowler;Andrew E. Allen;Andrew E. Allen;Jonathan H. Badger;Jane Grimwood

  • 3D-Jury: a simple approach to improve protein structure predictions

    Krzysztof Ginalski;Arne Elofsson;Daniel Fischer;Leszek Rychlewski

  • ELM server: a new resource for investigating short functional sites in modular eukaryotic proteins

    Pål Puntervoll;Rune Linding;Christine Gemünd;Sophie Chabanis-Davidson

  • Comparison of sequence profiles. Strategies for structural predictions using sequence information.

    Leszek Rychlewski;Lukasz Jaroszewski;Weizhong Li;Adam Godzik

  • FFAS03 : a server for profile-profile sequence alignments

    Lukasz Jaroszewski;Leszek Rychlewski;Zhanwen Li;Weizhong Li

  • MaxSub: an automated measure for the assessment of protein structure prediction quality.

    Naomi Siew;Arne Elofsson;Leszek Rychlewski;Daniel Fischer

  • Pcons: a neural-network-based consensus predictor that improves fold recognition.

    Jesper Lundström;Leszek Rychlewski;Janusz Bujnicki;Arne Elofsson

  • XtalPred: a web server for prediction of protein crystallizability.

    Lukasz Slabinski;Lukasz Jaroszewski;Leszek Rychlewski;Ian A. Wilson

  • Alphaherpesvirinae and Gammaherpesvirinae glycoprotein L and CMV UL130 originate from chemokines

    Maja Malkowska;Katarzyna Kokoszynska;Magdalena Dymecka;Leszek Rychlewski

  • ELM: the status of the 2010 eukaryotic linear motif resource

    Cathryn M. Gould;Francesca Diella;Allegra Via;Pål Puntervoll

  • Structure prediction meta server

    Janusz M. Bujnicki;Arne Elofsson;Daniel Fischer;Leszek Rychlewski

  • A study of quality measures for protein threading models

    Susana Cristobal;Adam T. Zemla;Daniel Fischer;Leszek Rychlewski

  • CAFASP‐1: Critical assessment of fully automated structure prediction methods

    Daniel Fischer;Christian Barret;Kevin Bryson;Arne Elofsson

  • The challenge of protein structure determination--lessons from structural genomics.

    Lukasz Slabinski;Lukasz Jaroszewski;Ana P.C. Rodrigues;Leszek Rychlewski

  • Comprehensive classification of nucleotidyltransferase fold proteins: identification of novel families and their representatives in human

    Krzysztof Kuchta;Lukasz Knizewski;Lucjan S. Wyrwicz;Leszek Rychlewski

  • CAFASP3: the third critical assessment of fully automated structure prediction methods.

    Daniel Fischer;Arne Elofsson;Leszek Rychlewski;Florencio Pazos

  • Practical lessons from protein structure prediction

    Krzysztof Ginalski;Krzysztof Ginalski;Nick V. Grishin;Adam Godzik;Leszek Rychlewski

  • ORFeus: detection of distant homology using sequence profiles and predicted secondary structure

    Krzysztof Ginalski;Jakub Pas;Lucjan Stanislaw Wyrwicz;Marcin von Grotthuss

  • Sequence, structure and functional diversity of PD-(D/E)XK phosphodiesterase superfamily

    Kamil Steczkiewicz;Anna Muszewska;Lukasz Knizewski;Leszek Rychlewski

  • Improving the quality of twilight-zone alignments.

    Lukasz Jaroszewski;Leszek Rychlewski;Adam Godzik

Frequent Co-Authors

Krzysztof Ginalski
Krzysztof Ginalski University of Warsaw
Adam Godzik
Adam Godzik University of California, Riverside
Arne Elofsson
Arne Elofsson Science for Life Laboratory
Nick V. Grishin
Nick V. Grishin The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Lukasz Jaroszewski
Lukasz Jaroszewski Discovery Institute
Lisa N. Kinch
Lisa N. Kinch The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Andrew E. Allen
Andrew E. Allen J. Craig Venter Institute
Jeremy Schmutz
Jeremy Schmutz Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Andrzej Kolinski
Andrzej Kolinski University of Warsaw

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Biology or Biochemistry opens doors to a wide range of career options and study paths. Many students today are using online programs to access top-quality education with flexibility and speed. For example, online biology programs allow you to study core concepts in life sciences while balancing work or personal commitments.

Interest in health-related fields can lead to exciting roles in patient care or healthcare management. The online asn is a popular entry point for those seeking to become registered nurses. For those interested in nutrition and wellness, the best online nutrition degree programs provide the skills required for careers in dietetics, health coaching, or food science.

Leadership and administrative roles in healthcare are also in high demand. A degree from one of the cahme accredited mha programs can prepare Biology and Biochemistry graduates for management careers in hospitals, public health, or biotech firms. These online options provide flexibility while preparing you for rewarding career pathways in science and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Leszek Rychlewski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles