World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 45 6494 6237 234 228 286 6690

Lennart T. Bach publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lennart T. Bach between 2009 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lennart T. Bach published across 18 years, from 2009 to 2026, averaging 17.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 46 publications in 2023. 25 of the 312 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2009 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 46. Peak 46 publications in 2023. 2009: 2 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 4 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 24 publications 2016: 26 publications 2017: 30 publications 2018: 26 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 25 publications 2022: 26 publications 2023: 46 publications 2024: 26 publications 2025: 22 publications 2026: 3 publications
2009 2026

312 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lennart T. Bach: publications per year, 2009 to 2026
Year Publications
2009 2
2010 1
2011 4
2012 5
2013 3
2014 8
2015 24
2016 26
2017 30
2018 26
2019 22
2020 13
2021 25
2022 26
2023 46
2024 26
2025 22
2026 3
Total 312
Download as CSV

Lennart T. Bach publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lennart T. Bach sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 281–290 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 286 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130 286
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Lennart T. Bach D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lennart T. Bach sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348 45
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • CO2 removal with enhanced weathering and ocean alkalinity enhancement: potential risks and co-benefits for marine pelagic ecosystems

    Lennart T. Bach;Sophie J. Gill;Rosalind E. M. Rickaby;Sarah Gore

  • Why marine phytoplankton calcify

    Fanny M Monteiro;Lennart T. Bach;Colin Brownlee;Paul Bown

  • Dissecting the impact of CO2 and pH on the mechanisms of photosynthesis and calcification in the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi

    Lennart T. Bach;Luke C. M. Mackinder;Kai G. Schulz;Glen Wheeler

  • Temperature modulates coccolithophorid sensitivity of growth, photosynthesis and calcification to increasing seawater pCO2

    Scarlett Sett;Lennart Thomas Bach;Kai Georg Schulz;Signe Koch-Klavsen

  • A unifying concept of coccolithophore sensitivity to changing carbonate chemistry embedded in an ecological framework

    Lennart Thomas Bach;Ulf Riebesell;Magdalena A. Gutowska;Luisa Federwisch

  • Testing the climate intervention potential of ocean afforestation using the Great Atlantic Sargassum Belt.

    Lennart T. Bach;Veronica Tamsitt;Veronica Tamsitt;Jim Gower;Catriona L. Hurd

  • Influence of Ocean Acidification on a Natural Winter-to-Summer Plankton Succession: First Insights from a Long-Term Mesocosm Study Draw Attention to Periods of Low Nutrient Concentrations

    Lennart T. Bach;Jan Taucher;Tim Boxhammer;Andrea Ludwig

  • Ocean alkalinity enhancement – avoiding runaway CaCO<sub>3</sub> precipitation during quick and hydrated lime dissolution

    Unknown

  • Distinguishing between the effects of ocean acidification and ocean carbonation in the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi

    Lennart Thomas Bach;Ulf Riebesell;Kai Georg Schulz

  • An approach for particle sinking velocity measurements in the 3–400 μm size range and considerations on the effect of temperature on sinking rates

    Lennart Thomas Bach;Ulf Riebesell;Scarlett Sett;Sarah Febiri

  • Assessing the influence of ocean alkalinity enhancement on a coastal phytoplankton community

    Unknown

  • Toxic algal bloom induced by ocean acidification disrupts the pelagic food web

    Ulf Riebesell;Nicole Aberle-Malzahn;Eric P. Achterberg;María Algueró-Muñiz

  • Influence of ocean acidification and deep water upwelling on oligotrophic plankton communities in the subtropical North Atlantic: Insights from an in situ mesocosm study

    Jan Taucher;Lennart T. Bach;Tim Boxhammer;Alice Nauendorf

  • Reconsidering the role of carbonate ion concentration in calcification by marine organisms

    Unknown

  • Potential role of seaweeds in climate change mitigation.

    Unknown

  • Phytoplankton Blooms at Increasing Levels of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide: Experimental Evidence for Negative Effects on Prymnesiophytes and Positive on Small Picoeukaryotes

    Kai G. Schulz;Kai G. Schulz;Lennart T. Bach;Richard G. J. Bellerby;Richard G. J. Bellerby;Rafael Bermúdez;Rafael Bermúdez

  • Potential negative effects of ocean afforestation on offshore ecosystems

    Unknown

  • Influence of changing carbonate chemistry on morphology and weight of coccoliths formed by Emiliania huxleyi

    Lennart T. Bach;C. Bauke;K. J. S. Meier;Ulf Riebesell

  • Competitive fitness of a predominant pelagic calcifier impaired by ocean acidification

    Ulf Riebesell;Lennart T. Bach;Richard G. J. Bellerby;Richard G. J. Bellerby;J. Rafael Bermúdez Monsalve;J. Rafael Bermúdez Monsalve

Frequent Co-Authors

Ulf Riebesell
Ulf Riebesell GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel
Kai G. Schulz
Kai G. Schulz Southern Cross University
Eric P. Achterberg
Eric P. Achterberg GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel
Javier Arístegui
Javier Arístegui University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Hans-Peter Grossart
Hans-Peter Grossart University of Potsdam
Catriona Clemmesen
Catriona Clemmesen GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel
Corina P. D. Brussaard
Corina P. D. Brussaard Utrecht University
Leif G. Anderson
Leif G. Anderson University of Gothenburg
Uwe John
Uwe John Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Richard G. J. Bellerby
Richard G. J. Bellerby East China Normal University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary fields and career paths. For those interested in the earth’s physical processes, pursuing a geology online degree offers a strong foundation in understanding soil, rocks, and natural resources. This knowledge is crucial for careers in natural hazard assessment and resource management.

Experts in spatial data and environmental mapping often turn to Geographic Information Systems (GIS) for critical decision-making. Exploring the best gis programs online can provide the technical skills needed to analyze environmental patterns and support sustainability initiatives.

For those interested in public policy and administration related to environmental issues, a focused degree such as a Master of Public Administration (MPA) can be valuable. Accelerated options like the mpa one year programs enable students to gain leadership skills quickly, advancing careers in government and non-profits.

Environmental challenges often intersect with social behavior and community impact. Pursuing degrees such as the best online bachelor degree in sociology equips graduates to understand societal interactions and advocate for environmental justice effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Lennart T. Bach

Recently Published Articles