World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
45
Citations
6690
World Ranking
6492
National Ranking
234

Lennart T. Bach publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lennart T. Bach sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 286 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Lennart T. Bach D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lennart T. Bach sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • CO2 removal with enhanced weathering and ocean alkalinity enhancement: potential risks and co-benefits for marine pelagic ecosystems

    Lennart T. Bach;Sophie J. Gill;Rosalind E. M. Rickaby;Sarah Gore

  • Why marine phytoplankton calcify

    Fanny M Monteiro;Lennart T. Bach;Colin Brownlee;Paul Bown

  • Dissecting the impact of CO2 and pH on the mechanisms of photosynthesis and calcification in the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi

    Lennart T. Bach;Luke C. M. Mackinder;Kai G. Schulz;Glen Wheeler

  • Forensic carbon accounting: Assessing the role of seaweeds for carbon sequestration

    Unknown

  • Temperature modulates coccolithophorid sensitivity of growth, photosynthesis and calcification to increasing seawater pCO2

    Scarlett Sett;Lennart Thomas Bach;Kai Georg Schulz;Signe Koch-Klavsen

  • A unifying concept of coccolithophore sensitivity to changing carbonate chemistry embedded in an ecological framework

    Lennart Thomas Bach;Ulf Riebesell;Magdalena A. Gutowska;Luisa Federwisch

  • Testing the climate intervention potential of ocean afforestation using the Great Atlantic Sargassum Belt.

    Lennart T. Bach;Veronica Tamsitt;Veronica Tamsitt;Jim Gower;Catriona L. Hurd

  • Influence of Ocean Acidification on a Natural Winter-to-Summer Plankton Succession: First Insights from a Long-Term Mesocosm Study Draw Attention to Periods of Low Nutrient Concentrations

    Lennart T. Bach;Jan Taucher;Tim Boxhammer;Andrea Ludwig

  • Ocean alkalinity enhancement – avoiding runaway CaCO<sub>3</sub> precipitation during quick and hydrated lime dissolution

    Unknown

  • Distinguishing between the effects of ocean acidification and ocean carbonation in the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi

    Lennart Thomas Bach;Ulf Riebesell;Kai Georg Schulz

  • An approach for particle sinking velocity measurements in the 3–400 μm size range and considerations on the effect of temperature on sinking rates

    Lennart Thomas Bach;Ulf Riebesell;Scarlett Sett;Sarah Febiri

  • Assessing the influence of ocean alkalinity enhancement on a coastal phytoplankton community

    Unknown

  • Toxic algal bloom induced by ocean acidification disrupts the pelagic food web

    Ulf Riebesell;Nicole Aberle-Malzahn;Eric P. Achterberg;María Algueró-Muñiz

  • Influence of ocean acidification and deep water upwelling on oligotrophic plankton communities in the subtropical North Atlantic: Insights from an in situ mesocosm study

    Jan Taucher;Lennart T. Bach;Tim Boxhammer;Alice Nauendorf

  • Reconsidering the role of carbonate ion concentration in calcification by marine organisms

    Unknown

  • Potential role of seaweeds in climate change mitigation.

    Unknown

  • Phytoplankton Blooms at Increasing Levels of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide: Experimental Evidence for Negative Effects on Prymnesiophytes and Positive on Small Picoeukaryotes

    Kai G. Schulz;Kai G. Schulz;Lennart T. Bach;Richard G. J. Bellerby;Richard G. J. Bellerby;Rafael Bermúdez;Rafael Bermúdez

  • Potential negative effects of ocean afforestation on offshore ecosystems

    Unknown

  • Influence of changing carbonate chemistry on morphology and weight of coccoliths formed by Emiliania huxleyi

    Lennart T. Bach;C. Bauke;K. J. S. Meier;Ulf Riebesell

  • Competitive fitness of a predominant pelagic calcifier impaired by ocean acidification

    Ulf Riebesell;Lennart T. Bach;Richard G. J. Bellerby;Richard G. J. Bellerby;J. Rafael Bermúdez Monsalve;J. Rafael Bermúdez Monsalve

Frequent Co-Authors

Ulf Riebesell
Ulf Riebesell GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel
Kai G. Schulz
Kai G. Schulz Southern Cross University
Eric P. Achterberg
Eric P. Achterberg GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel
Javier Arístegui
Javier Arístegui University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Hans-Peter Grossart
Hans-Peter Grossart University of Potsdam
Catriona Clemmesen
Catriona Clemmesen GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel
Corina P. D. Brussaard
Corina P. D. Brussaard Utrecht University
Leif G. Anderson
Leif G. Anderson University of Gothenburg
Uwe John
Uwe John Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Richard G. J. Bellerby
Richard G. J. Bellerby East China Normal University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary fields and career paths. For those interested in the earth’s physical processes, pursuing a geology online degree offers a strong foundation in understanding soil, rocks, and natural resources. This knowledge is crucial for careers in natural hazard assessment and resource management.

Experts in spatial data and environmental mapping often turn to Geographic Information Systems (GIS) for critical decision-making. Exploring the best gis programs online can provide the technical skills needed to analyze environmental patterns and support sustainability initiatives.

For those interested in public policy and administration related to environmental issues, a focused degree such as a Master of Public Administration (MPA) can be valuable. Accelerated options like the mpa one year programs enable students to gain leadership skills quickly, advancing careers in government and non-profits.

Environmental challenges often intersect with social behavior and community impact. Pursuing degrees such as the best online bachelor degree in sociology equips graduates to understand societal interactions and advocate for environmental justice effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Lennart T. Bach