World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 51 5146 4772 540 510 125 13080

Kate Cavanagh publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kate Cavanagh between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kate Cavanagh published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 5.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2003. 10 of the 164 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2003. 1996: 2 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 10 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 5 publications
1996 2025

164 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kate Cavanagh: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 2
1997 0
1998 2
1999 1
2000 2
2001 5
2002 2
2003 12
2004 6
2005 3
2006 3
2007 6
2008 3
2009 7
2010 8
2011 3
2012 9
2013 8
2014 5
2015 1
2016 10
2017 7
2018 8
2019 3
2020 12
2021 10
2022 8
2023 8
2024 5
2025 5
Total 164
Download as CSV

Kate Cavanagh publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kate Cavanagh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 125 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 125
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Kate Cavanagh D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kate Cavanagh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 51
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Kate Cavanagh is affiliated with the University of Sussex in the United Kingdom, specializing in psychology with a focus on clinical and applied psychology domains.

Their research primarily spans the main field of Psychology, encompassing 79 publications. Key subfields include Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, and General Health Professions.

The topics addressed in their work cover a diverse range of mental health-related subjects. These include:

  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions

Cavanagh has contributed to several recent scholarly papers, such as:

  • "Effect of breathwork on stress and mental health: A meta-analysis of randomised-controlled trials," 2023, published in Scientific Reports
  • "Preliminary Evaluation of the Engagement and Effectiveness of a Mental Health Chatbot," 2020, published in Frontiers in Digital Health
  • "Can a little bit of mindfulness do you good? A systematic review and meta-analyses of unguided mindfulness-based self-help interventions," 2021, published in Clinical Psychology Review
  • "Health Care Workers' Need for Headspace: Findings From a Multisite Definitive Randomized Controlled Trial of an Unguided Digital Mindfulness-Based Self-help App to Reduce Healthcare Worker Stress," 2022, published in JMIR mhealth and uhealth
  • "Chatbot-Based Assessment of Employees' Mental Health: Design Process and Pilot Implementation," 2021, published in JMIR Formative Research

Frequent publication venues include:

  • ISRCTN Registry
  • Scientific Reports
  • JMIR Formative Research
  • BJPsych Open
  • Trials

Key collaborators who have co-authored multiple times with Cavanagh are:

  • Clara Strauss
  • Anna-Marie Jones
  • Marcos Economides
  • L. Lea
  • Claire Rosten

Best Publications

  • How do mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and mindfulness-based stress reduction improve mental health and wellbeing? A systematic review and meta-analysis of mediation studies

    Jenny Gu;Clara Strauss;Rod Bond;Kate Cavanagh

  • What is compassion and how can we measure it? A review of definitions and measures

    Clara Strauss;Clara Strauss;Billie Lever Taylor;Jenny Gu;Willem Kuyken

  • Mindfulness-based interventions for people diagnosed with a current episode of an anxiety or depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

    Clara Strauss;Kate Cavanagh;Annie Oliver;Danelle Pettman

  • Computer-aided psychotherapy for anxiety disorders: a meta-analytic review

    Pim Cuijpers;Isaac M. Marks;Annemieke van Straten;Kate Cavanagh

  • Disgust propensity and disgust sensitivity: separate constructs that are differentially related to specific fears.

    W. J. M. van Overveld;de Peter Jong;M. L. Peters;K. Cavanagh

  • A randomised controlled trial of a brief online mindfulness-based intervention

    Kate Cavanagh;Clara Strauss;Francesca Cicconi;Natasha Griffiths

  • Cost-effectiveness of computerised cognitive-behavioural therapy for anxiety and depression in primary care: randomised controlled trial

    Paul McCrone;Martin Knapp;Judith Proudfoot;Clash Ryden

  • Can mindfulness and acceptance be learnt by self-help?: a systematic review and meta-analysis of mindfulness and acceptance-based self-help interventions.

    Kate Cavanagh;Clara Strauss;Lewis Forder;Fergal Jones

  • Examining the factor structure of the 39-item and 15-item versions of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire before and after mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for people with recurrent depression.

    Jenny Gu;Clara Strauss;Catherine Crane;Thorsten Barnhofer

  • Improving Employee Well-Being and Effectiveness: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Web-Based Psychological Interventions Delivered in the Workplace

    Stephany Carolan;Peter R Harris;Kate Cavanagh

  • HANDS-ON HELP: Computer-aided Psychotherapy

    Isaac Meyer Marks;Kate Cavanagh;Lina Gega

  • The Effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Interventions in the Perinatal Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

    Billie Lever Taylor;Kate Cavanagh;Clara Strauss;Clara Strauss

  • Computer treatment for common mental health problems

    Kate Cavanagh;David A. Shapiro

  • Development and Psychometric Properties of the Sussex-Oxford Compassion Scales (SOCS):

    Jenny Gu;Ruth A. Baer;Ruth A. Baer;Kate Cavanagh;Willem Kuyken

  • Computer-Aided Psychological Treatments: Evolving Issues

    Isaac Marks;Kate Cavanagh

  • The effectiveness of computerized cognitive behavioural therapy in routine care

    K. Cavanagh;D. A. Shapiro;S. Van den Berg;S. Swain

  • Computer-aided psychotherapy: revolution or bubble?

    Isaac Marks;Kate Cavanagh;Lina Gega

  • A systematic review and meta-analysis of low intensity CBT for psychosis.

    Cassie M. Hazell;Mark Hayward;Mark Hayward;Kate Cavanagh;Clara Strauss;Clara Strauss

  • Computerised Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Common Mental Health Disorders, What Works, for Whom Under What Circumstances? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Rebecca Grist;Kate Cavanagh

  • A Randomised Controlled Trial of a Brief Online Mindfulness-Based Intervention in a Non-clinical Population: Replication and Extension.

    Kate Cavanagh;Alasdair Churchard;Puffin O’Hanlon;Thomas Mundy

  • Computerized cognitive behavioural therapy and the therapeutic alliance: a qualitative enquiry.

    Natalie Barazzone;Kate Cavanagh;David A Richards

Frequent Co-Authors

Clara Strauss
Clara Strauss University of Sussex
Mark Hayward
Mark Hayward University of Sussex
Graham C. L. Davey
Graham C. L. Davey University of Sussex
Ruth A. Baer
Ruth A. Baer University of Kentucky
Isaac Marks
Isaac Marks King's College London
Willem Kuyken
Willem Kuyken University of Oxford
David Fowler
David Fowler University of Sussex
Mark H. Freeston
Mark H. Freeston Newcastle University
Pim Cuijpers
Pim Cuijpers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As interest in psychology continues to grow, many students are seeking flexible and cost-effective ways to advance their education. Online psychology degrees offer the convenience and accessibility needed to balance studies with other commitments. For those focused on affordability, several options stand out across the country.

If you're searching for quality but affordable psychology degrees in New Jersey, several universities offer cost-friendly online programs without compromising academic standards. Students based near New York can take advantage of the cheapest psychology programs in New York, which provide excellent value coupled with diverse learning pathways.

Other budget-friendly states include Ohio, where you can find the cheapest psychology degrees in Ohio, and Oklahoma, notable for its cheapest psychology programs in Oklahoma. These online degrees can prepare you for various career pathways, from counseling and social work to research and human resources.

Ultimately, choosing the right program is about balancing quality, convenience, and affordability—setting you on a successful path to a rewarding psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Kate Cavanagh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles