World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 61 3047 2791 81 79 226 10904

Juan M. Tomás publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Juan M. Tomás between 1979 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Juan M. Tomás published across 47 years, from 1979 to 2025, averaging 5.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2024. 13 of the 242 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2024. 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 9 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 10 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication 2021: 3 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 1 publication
1979 2025

242 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Juan M. Tomás: publications per year, 1979 to 2025
Year Publications
1979 1
1980 0
1981 1
1982 1
1983 0
1984 4
1985 3
1986 5
1987 7
1988 4
1989 6
1990 7
1991 9
1992 6
1993 10
1994 2
1995 7
1996 10
1997 7
1998 6
1999 8
2000 4
2001 7
2002 4
2003 9
2004 9
2005 5
2006 7
2007 6
2008 6
2009 10
2010 4
2011 5
2012 6
2013 6
2014 6
2015 8
2016 8
2017 4
2018 1
2019 1
2020 1
2021 3
2022 3
2023 2
2024 12
2025 1
Total 242
Download as CSV

Juan M. Tomás publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Juan M. Tomás sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 225–234 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 226 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155 226
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Juan M. Tomás D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Juan M. Tomás sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123 61
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

Juan M. Tomás is affiliated with the University of Barcelona in Spain. Their research spans multiple fields within biological sciences, focusing primarily on Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, Immunology and Microbiology, and Environmental Science.

Their work covers various subfields including Molecular Biology, Ecology, Immunology, Endocrinology, and Microbiology. The scientific topics examined by Juan M. Tomás involve:

  • Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
  • Aquaculture disease management and microbiota
  • Vibrio bacteria research studies
  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Escherichia coli research studies
  • Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
  • Bacterial Infections and Vaccines

Juan M. Tomás has published in several peer-reviewed venues, frequently contributing to:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • eLife
  • Journal of Visualized Experiments
  • Marine Drugs

Their recent publications include:

  • "Surface Glucan Structures in Aeromonas spp." (2021) published in Marine Drugs
  • "Roles of Proteins Containing Immunoglobulin-Like Domains in the Conjugation of Bacterial Plasmids" (2022) published in mSphere
  • "Polar Flagella Glycosylation in Aeromonas: Genomic Characterization and Involvement of a Specific Glycosyltransferase (Fgi-1) in Heterogeneous Flagella Glycosylation" (2021) published in Frontiers in Microbiology
  • "Complete Characterization of the O-Antigen from the LPS of Aeromonas bivalvium" (2022) published in International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • "Targeting plasmid-encoded proteins that contain immunoglobulin-like domains to combat antimicrobial resistance" (2024) published in eLife

In their collaborative efforts, Juan M. Tomás frequently works with a number of coauthors, notably:

  • Susana Merino
  • Elena Mendoza-Barberà
  • Kelly M. Fulton
  • Susan M. Twine
  • Mário Hüttener

Best Publications

  • The main Aeromonas pathogenic factors.

    J. M. Tomás

  • Capsule polysaccharide is a bacterial decoy for antimicrobial peptides

    Enrique Llobet;Juan M. Tomás;Jose A Bengoechea

  • In vivo selection of porin-deficient mutants of Klebsiella pneumoniae with increased resistance to cefoxitin and expanded-spectrum-cephalosporins.

    L Martínez-Martínez;S Hernández-Allés;S Albertí;J M Tomás

  • Quorum Sensing-Dependent Regulation and Blockade of Exoprotease Production in Aeromonas hydrophila

    Simon Swift;Martin J. Lynch;Leigh Fish;David F. Kirke

  • Emerging pathogens: Aeromonas spp.

    Susana Merino;Xavier Rubires;Susanne Knøchel;Juan M. Tomás

  • Mechanisms of Klebsiella pneumoniae resistance to complement-mediated killing.

    S Merino;S Camprubí;S Albertí;V J Benedí

  • Porin expression in clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae.

    Santiago Hernández-Allés;Sebastián Albertí;Dolores Álvarez;Antonio Doménech-Sánchez

  • Motility and the polar flagellum are required for Aeromonas caviae adherence to HEp-2 cells.

    Ali A. Rabaan;Ioannis Gryllos;Juan M. Tomás;Jonathan G. Shaw

  • Role of capsule and O antigen in resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae to serum bactericidal activity.

    J M Tomás;V J Benedí;B Ciurana;J Jofre

  • Role of Klebsiella pneumoniae OmpK35 Porin in Antimicrobial Resistance

    Antonio Doménech-Sánchez;Luis Martínez-Martínez;Santiago Hernández-Allés;María del Carmen Conejo

  • Lateral flagella of Aeromonas species are essential for epithelial cell adherence and biofilm formation.

    Rosalina Gavín;Ali A. Rabaan;Susana Merino;Juan M. Tomás

  • Virulence Factors of Erwinia amylovora: A Review

    Núria Piqué;David Miñana-Galbis;Susana Merino;Juan M. Tomás

  • A Type III Secretion System Is Required for Aeromonas hydrophila AH-1 Pathogenesis

    H. B. Yu;P. S. Srinivasa Rao;H. C. Lee;S. Vilches

  • Bacterial lateral flagella: an inducible flagella system

    Susana Merino;Jonathan G. Shaw;Juan M. Tomás

  • Identification and Characterization of Putative Virulence Genes and Gene Clusters in Aeromonas hydrophila PPD134/91

    H. B. Yu;Y. L. Zhang;Y. L. Lau;F. Yao

  • Role of bacterial surface structures on the interaction of Klebsiella pneumoniae with phagocytes

    Catalina March;Victoria Cano;David Moranta;Enrique Llobet

  • A porin from Klebsiella pneumoniae: sequence homology, three-dimensional model, and complement binding

    S Albertí;F Rodríquez-Quiñones;T Schirmer;G Rummel

  • C1q binding and activation of the complement classical pathway by Klebsiella pneumoniae outer membrane proteins.

    S Albertí;G Marqués;S Camprubí;S Merino

  • Klebsiella pneumoniae Lipopolysaccharide O Typing: Revision of Prototype Strains and O-Group Distribution among Clinical Isolates from Different Sources and Countries

    Dennis S. Hansen;Francesca Mestre;Sebastián Albertí;Santiago Hernández-Allés

  • Capsular polysaccharide is a major complement resistance factor in lipopolysaccharide O side chain-deficient Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates.

    Dolores Álvarez;Susana Merino;Juan M. Tomás;Vicente J. Benedí

Frequent Co-Authors

Susana Merino
Susana Merino University of Barcelona
Sebastián Albertí
Sebastián Albertí University of the Balearic Islands
Yuriy A. Knirel
Yuriy A. Knirel Russian Academy of Sciences
Juan Jofre
Juan Jofre University of Barcelona
William W. Kay
William W. Kay University of Victoria
Paul Williams
Paul Williams University of Nottingham
Luis Martínez-Martínez
Luis Martínez-Martínez University of Córdoba
José A. Bengoechea
José A. Bengoechea Queen's University Belfast
Buko Lindner
Buko Lindner Research Center Borstel - Leibniz-Center for Medicine and Biosciences
Alexander S. Shashkov
Alexander S. Shashkov Russian Academy of Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in exploring alternative or complementary fields to Microbiology, healthcare-related online degrees offer promising career options. A bachelor of science in health information management salary can be quite competitive, reflecting the growing demand for professionals who manage medical data and patient information efficiently.

Choosing programs that are cahiim accredited him degree online ensures a high standard of education and eligibility for certification, which is crucial for career advancement in health information management.

For those seeking quicker entry into the healthcare field, a fast track medical billing and coding certificate online can provide valuable skills needed for vital administrative roles that support healthcare delivery and billing accuracy.

Overall, many online healthcare degrees that pay well are available for microbiology graduates to diversify their expertise and enhance their career options in the evolving healthcare industry.

Best Scientists Citing Juan M. Tomás

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles