World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jon Nissen-Meyer

Jon Nissen-Meyer

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
55
Citations
11716
World Ranking
14988
National Ranking
74

Jon Nissen-Meyer publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jon Nissen-Meyer sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 130 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Jon Nissen-Meyer D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jon Nissen-Meyer sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jon Nissen-Meyer is affiliated with the University of Oslo in Norway. Their research focuses on several interdisciplinary fields, primarily within biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology.

Their work spans multiple subfields of study, including molecular biology, sociology and political science, endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism, economics and econometrics, as well as computational theory and mathematics.

Nissen-Meyer has contributed to topics that encompass doping in sports, hormonal and reproductive studies, sports analytics and performance, computational drug discovery methods, receptor mechanisms and signaling, and chemical synthesis and analysis.

Their recent publications include:

  • Are doping tests in sports trustworthy?, 2022, EMBO Reports
  • A universal model for drug-receptor interactions, 2025, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

The scientist has collaborated with several co-authors, including:

  • Tore Skotland
  • Erik Boye
  • Filipe Menezes
  • Adam Wahida
  • Tony Fröhlich

Frequent venues for their publications include EMBO Reports and the bioRxiv repository hosted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.

Best Publications

  • A highly sensitive cell line, WEHI 164 clone 13, for measuring cytotoxic factor/tumor necrosis factor from human monocytes.

    Terje Espevik;Jon Nissen-Meyer

  • Ribosomally synthesized antimicrobial peptides: their function, structure, biogenesis, and mechanism of action

    Jon Nissen-Meyer;Ingolf F. Nes

  • A novel lactococcal bacteriocin whose activity depends on the complementary action of two peptides.

    J Nissen-Meyer;H Holo;L S Håvarstein;K Sletten

  • Pediocin PA-1, a Bacteriocin from Pediococcus acidilactici PAC1.0, Forms Hydrophilic Pores in the Cytoplasmic Membrane of Target Cells

    Michael L. Chikindas;Maria J. García-Garcerá;Arnold J.M. Driessen;Aat M. Ledeboer

  • Antagonistic Activity of Lactobacillus plantarum C11: Two New Two-Peptide Bacteriocins, Plantaricins EF and JK, and the Induction Factor Plantaricin A

    Erlend L. Anderssen;Dzung Bao Diep;Ingolf F. Nes;Vincent G. H. Eijsink

  • Characterization of the Bacteriocins Curvacin A from Lactobacillus curvatus LTH1174 and Sakacin P from L. sake LTH673

    Petra S. Tichaczek;Jon Nissen-Meyer;Ingolf F. Nes;Rudi F. Vogel

  • Synthesis and antimycobacterial activity of 6-arylpurines: the requirements for the N-9 substituent in active antimycobacterial purines.

    Lise-Lotte Gundersen;Jon Nissen-Meyer;Bjørn Spilsberg

  • Structure-function relationships of the non-lanthionine-containing peptide (class II) bacteriocins produced by gram-positive bacteria.

    J. Nissen-Meyer;P. Rogne;C. Oppegard;H. S. Haugen

  • Hipposin, a histone-derived antimicrobial peptide in Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus L.)

    Gunn Alice Birkemo;Torben Lüders;Øivind Andersen;Ingolf F Nes

  • Pediocin-like antimicrobial peptides (class IIa bacteriocins) and their immunity proteins: biosynthesis, structure, and mode of action.

    Gunnar Fimland;Line Johnsen;Bjørn Dalhus;Jon Nissen-Meyer

  • The Two-Peptide Class II Bacteriocins: Structure, Production, and Mode of Action

    Camilla Oppegård;Per Rogne;Linda Emanuelsen;Per Eugen Kristiansen

  • Structure and Mode-of-Action of the Two-Peptide (Class-IIb) Bacteriocins.

    Jon Nissen-Meyer;Camilla Oppegård;Per Rogne;Helen Sophie Haugen

  • New biologically active hybrid bacteriocins constructed by combining regions from various pediocin-like bacteriocins: the C-terminal region is important for determining specificity

    G Fimland;O R Blingsmo;K Sletten;G Jung

  • Production and pH-Dependent Bactericidal Activity of Lactocin S, a Lantibiotic from Lactobacillus sake L45.

    C I Mortvedt-Abildgaa;J Nissen-Meyer;B Jelle;B Grenov

  • Interaction of the antimicrobial peptide pheromone Plantaricin A with model membranes: implications for a novel mechanism of action.

    Hongxia Zhao;Rohit Sood;Arimatti Jutila;Shambhunath Bose

  • The gene encoding plantaricin A, a bacteriocin from Lactobacillus plantarum C11, is located on the same transcription unit as an agr-like regulatory system.

    Dzung Bao Diep;L. S. Håvarstein;J. Nissen-Meyer;I. F. Nes

  • In vivo conversion of L-serine to D-alanine in a ribosomally synthesized polypeptide.

    M Skaugen;J Nissen-Meyer;G Jung;S Stevanovic

  • Mutational analysis of the role of tryptophan residues in an antimicrobial peptide.

    Gunnar Fimland;Vincent G. H. Eijsink;Jon Nissen-Meyer

  • A C-terminal disulfide bridge in pediocin-like bacteriocins renders bacteriocin activity less temperature dependent and is a major determinant of the antimicrobial spectrum.

    Gunnar Fimland;Line Johnsen;Lars Axelsson;May B. Brurberg

  • The C-terminal domain of pediocin-like antimicrobial peptides (class IIa bacteriocins) is involved in specific recognition of the C-terminal part of cognate immunity proteins and in determining the antimicrobial spectrum.

    Line Johnsen;Gunnar Fimland;Jon Nissen-Meyer

Frequent Co-Authors

Ingolf F. Nes
Ingolf F. Nes Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Terje Espevik
Terje Espevik Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Knut Sletten
Knut Sletten University of Oslo
Vincent G. H. Eijsink
Vincent G. H. Eijsink Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Frode Rise
Frode Rise University of Oslo
Arnold J. M. Driessen
Arnold J. M. Driessen University of Groningen
Wil N. Konings
Wil N. Konings University of Groningen
Dzung B. Diep
Dzung B. Diep Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Leiv Sigve Håvarstein
Leiv Sigve Håvarstein Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Günther Jung
Günther Jung University of Tübingen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Biology or Biochemistry opens the door to many fast-growing fields in healthcare and life sciences. For those interested in human health and nutrition, there are fast track nutrition degree online programs that offer flexible entry into nutrition science, often with accelerated study options.

A management-focused path, such as pursuing online healthcare mba programs, can help biology graduates step into leadership roles within hospitals, biotech firms, and public health organizations. These degrees are designed for those looking to combine their science background with essential business skills.

For students interested in administrative and technical roles, understanding medical coding certification options is crucial. Certifications like CPC and CCS can lead to career advancement and higher earning potential.

Curious about the job outlook and pay? The medical.coder salary in the United States is competitive, especially for those with experience and industry-recognized credentials.

Best Scientists Citing Jon Nissen-Meyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles