World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
John Kevin Collins

John Kevin Collins

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
62
Citations
17230
World Ranking
10629
National Ranking
49

John Kevin Collins publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Kevin Collins sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 201 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

John Kevin Collins D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Kevin Collins sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

John Kevin Collins is affiliated with University College Cork in Ireland. Their academic profile shows involvement in research, although no specific recent papers, co-authors, or publication venues are currently documented.

Details about the scientist's main fields of study, subfields, and topics of research have not been provided, suggesting either a developing research portfolio or a profile that has not been extensively cataloged in accessible sources.

There are no recorded book publications or awards associated with John Kevin Collins at this time.

The available data does not list any recent scholarly articles or the venues where their work has appeared, nor does it specify frequent collaborators or research themes. This limits the ability to map a clear research trajectory or thematic focus.

As a member of the academic community at University College Cork, John Kevin Collins likely contributes to the institution's educational and research missions, which include diverse scientific endeavors. Further updates would be required to outline their specific research interests and output in detail.

Best Publications

  • Lactobacillus and bifidobacterium in irritable bowel syndrome: Symptom responses and relationship to cytokine profiles

    Liam O’Mahony;Jane McCarthy;Peter Kelly;George Hurley

  • In vitro selection criteria for probiotic bacteria of human origin: correlation with in vivo findings

    C Dunne;L O'Mahony;L Murphy;G Thornton

  • The fas counterattack : fas-mediated T cell killing by colon cancer cells expressing fas ligand

    J O'Connell;G C O'Sullivan;J K Collins;F Shanahan

  • Dietary synbiotics reduce cancer risk factors in polypectomized and colon cancer patients

    Joseph Rafter;Michael Bennett;Giovanna Caderni;Yvonne Clune

  • Antibiotic susceptibility of potentially probiotic Lactobacillus species.

    W P Charteris;P M Kelly;L Morelli;J K Collins

  • Double blind, placebo controlled trial of two probiotic strains in interleukin 10 knockout mice and mechanistic link with cytokine balance

    J. McCarthy;L. O'Mahony;L. O'Callaghan;B. Sheil

  • Comparative survival rates of human-derived probiotic Lactobacillus paracasei and L. salivarius strains during heat treatment and spray drying.

    G. E. Gardiner;E. O'Sullivan;J. Kelly;M. A. E. Auty

  • Selection of Probiotic Strains for Human Applications

    J.K. Collins;J.K. Collins;G. Thornton;G.O. Sullivan

  • The Fas Counterattack In Vivo: Apoptotic Depletion of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes Associated with Fas Ligand Expression by Human Esophageal Carcinoma

    M W Bennett;J O'Connell;G C O'Sullivan;C Brady

  • Development of a Probiotic Cheddar Cheese Containing Human-Derived Lactobacillus paracasei Strains

    G. Gardiner;R. P. Ross;J. K. Collins;G. Fitzgerald

  • Probiotic impact on microbial flora, inflammation and tumour development in IL-10 knockout mice.

    L. O'Mahony;M. Feeney;S. O'Halloran;L. Murphy

  • Culture-independent analysis of the gut microbiota in colorectal cancer and polyposis.

    Pauline D. Scanlan;Fergus Shanahan;Yvonne Clune;John K. Collins

  • Probiotic bacteria: myth or reality?

    M.G. O'Sullivan;G. Thornton;G.C. O'Sullivan;J.K. Collins

  • Direct in situ viability assessment of bacteria in probiotic dairy products using viability staining in conjunction with confocal scanning laser microscopy.

    M. A. E. Auty;G. E. Gardiner;S. J. McBrearty;E. O. O'Sullivan

  • Application of magnetohydrodynamic actuation to continuous flow chemistry

    Jonathan West;Boris Karamata;Brian Lillis;James P. Gleeson

  • Is the mucosal route of administration essential for probiotic function? Subcutaneous administration is associated with attenuation of murine colitis and arthritis.

    B Sheil;J McCarthy;L O’Mahony;M W Bennett

  • Evaluation of Cheddar Cheese as a Food Carrier for Delivery of a Probiotic Strain to the Gastrointestinal Tract

    G. Gardiner;C. Stanton;P.B. Lynch;J.K. Collins

  • A DNA diagnostic biosensor: development, characterisation and performance

    H. Berney;J. West;E. Haefele;J. Alderman

  • Bacterial DNA within granulomas of patients with Crohn's disease--detection by laser capture microdissection and PCR.

    Paul Ryan;Raymond G Kelly;Garry Lee;J Kevin Collins

  • Micrometastases in esophagogastric cancer: High detection rate in resected rib segments

    Gerald C. O'Sullivan;Dyan Sheehan;Andrew Clarke;Robert Stuart

Frequent Co-Authors

Fergus Shanahan
Fergus Shanahan National University of Ireland
Liam O'Mahony
Liam O'Mahony University College Cork
Gerald F. Fitzgerald
Gerald F. Fitzgerald University College Cork
Catherine Stanton
Catherine Stanton Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority
Gillian E. Gardiner
Gillian E. Gardiner South East Technological University
Cormac G. M. Gahan
Cormac G. M. Gahan University College Cork
Lorenzo Morelli
Lorenzo Morelli Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Beatrice L. Pool-Zobel
Beatrice L. Pool-Zobel Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Julian R. Marchesi
Julian R. Marchesi Imperial College London
Yulan Wang
Yulan Wang Nanyang Technological University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to a wide range of rewarding degrees and career pathways—many of which can also be pursued online. For those interested in merging their science background with healthcare data, earning an online health information management degree is a popular and affordable option that leads to jobs in hospitals, clinics, or even remote roles.

There is rising demand for specialized roles like medical billers and coders. While there are debates about is medical coding a dying career, the field still offers stability, entry-level opportunities, and a clear path for those with training in life sciences.

Perhaps you are interested in nutrition, sports science, or public health. Earning a nutrition masters online allows you to deepen your expertise while staying flexible with your studies and work obligations.

Finally, if direct patient care interests you, consider exploring ultrasound tech programs online. These programs combine biology, technology, and hands-on learning, preparing graduates for well-paying, in-demand healthcare roles.

Best Scientists Citing John Kevin Collins