World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 33 10571 9894 465 451 92 4418

John F. Stins publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John F. Stins between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John F. Stins published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2015. 5 of the 113 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2015. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 0 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 3 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 1 publication
1992 2025

113 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John F. Stins: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 1
1994 2
1995 0
1996 0
1997 8
1998 0
1999 2
2000 2
2001 5
2002 2
2003 4
2004 5
2005 4
2006 2
2007 5
2008 2
2009 5
2010 3
2011 4
2012 2
2013 4
2014 5
2015 11
2016 8
2017 10
2018 4
2019 1
2020 0
2021 2
2022 1
2023 3
2024 4
2025 1
Total 113
Download as CSV

John F. Stins publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John F. Stins sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 92 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 92
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

John F. Stins D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John F. Stins sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 33
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

John F. Stins is affiliated with the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research spans the fields of psychology and medicine, with particular emphasis on physical therapy, sports therapy, rehabilitation, and cognitive neuroscience. Additional subfields include social psychology, developmental and educational psychology, and applied psychology.

Their main topics of focus cover balance, gait, and falls prevention, behavioral health and interventions, neural and behavioral psychology studies, action observation and synchronization, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes, heart rate variability, autonomic control, as well as musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation.

Stins's work has been published in several academic venues, including:

  • Psychology & Neuroscience
  • Frontiers in Neurology
  • Scientific Reports
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • PLoS ONE

Their recent papers demonstrate a range of research topics and publication years, such as:

  • "Gait-modifying effects of augmented-reality cueing in people with Parkinson's disease," 2024, Frontiers in Neurology
  • "On the physiology of interruption after unexpectedness," 2021, Biological Psychology
  • "Both distance change and movement goal affect whole-body approach-avoidance behavior," 2021, Psychology & Neuroscience
  • "Task-relevant social cues affect whole-body approach-avoidance behavior," 2023, Scientific Reports
  • "Stepping into emotions: investigating the effect of angry and fearful faces on forward stepping and quiet stance," 2024, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Stins include:

  • Peter J. Beek
  • Eva M. Hoogendoorn
  • Daphne J. Geerse
  • Melvyn Roerdink
  • Kerstin Weissinger

The research contributions by John F. Stins primarily address understanding mechanisms behind gait and balance, as well as the psychophysiological aspects of human movement and behavior. Their interdisciplinary approach bridges clinical rehabilitation with cognitive and social psychological processes to investigate health-related behaviors and neural underpinnings.

Best Publications

  • Facing freeze: social threat induces bodily freeze in humans.

    Karin Roelofs;Muriel A. Hagenaars;John Stins

  • Accounting for sequential trial effects in the flanker task: Conflict adaptation or associative priming?

    Sander Nieuwenhuis;John F. Stins;Danielle Posthuma;Tinca J. C. Polderman

  • Effects of sleep deprivation on neural functioning: an integrative review.

    T. W. Boonstra;J. F. Stins;A. Daffertshofer;P. J. Beek

  • Sway regularity reflects attentional involvement in postural control: Effects of expertise, vision and cognition

    John Stins;Marian Michielsen;Marian Michielsen;Melvyn Roerdink;Peter Jan Beek

  • Salience and choice: Neural correlates of shopping decisions

    Tim Ambler;Sven Braeutigam;John Stins;Steven Rose

  • Walk to me when I smile, step back when I’m angry: emotional faces modulate whole-body approach–avoidance behaviors

    John F. Stins;Karin Roelofs;Jody Villan;Karen Kooijman

  • Effects of affective picture viewing on postural control.

    John F Stins;Peter J Beek

  • Aversive life events enhance human freezing responses.

    Muriel A. Hagenaars;John F. Stins;Karin Roelofs

  • Effects of attention on the control of locomotion in individuals with chronic low back pain

    Claudine J.C. Lamoth;John F. Stins;Menno Pont;Frederick Kerckhoff

  • Cortical changes in complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS)

    C.M.A. (Karin) Swart;John F. Stins;Peter J. Beek

  • Familial influences on sustained attention and inhibition in preschoolers

    Alexia S. Groot;Leo M.J. De Sonneville;John F. Stins;Dorret I. Boomsma

  • To freeze or not to freeze? Affective and cognitive perturbations have markedly different effects on postural control

    John F. Stins;Melvyn Roerdink;Peter J. Beek

  • Human freezing in response to affective films

    Muriel A. Hagenaars;Karin Roelofs;John F. Stins

  • CONDITIONAL ACCURACY IN RESPONSE INTERFERENCE TASKS: EVIDENCE FROM THE ERIKSEN FLANKER TASK AND THE SPATIAL CONFLICT TASK

    John F. Stins;J. C. Tinca Polderman;Dorret I. Boomsma;Eco J. C. de Geus

  • Genetic analyses of the stability of executive functioning during childhood

    Tinca J.C. Polderman;Danielle Posthuma;Leo M.J. De Sonneville;John F. Stins

  • Magnetoencephalographic Signals Identify Stages in Real-Life Decision Processes

    Sven Braeutigam;John F. Stins;Steven P. R. Rose;Stephen J. Swithenby

  • A kinematic analysis of hand selection in a reaching task

    John F. Stins;Endre E. Kadar;Alan Costall

  • Sustained Attention and Executive Functioning Performance in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

    John F. Stins;Marieke S. Tollenaar;Dorine I.E. Slaats-Willemse;Jan K. Buitelaar M.D.

  • Heritability of Stroop and flanker performance in 12-year old children.

    John F. Stins;G. Caroline M. van Baal;Tinca J.C. Polderman;Tinca J.C. Polderman;Frank C. Verhulst

  • Patterns of postural sway in high anxious children

    John F Stins;Annick Ledebt;Claudia Emck;Elisabeth H van Dokkum

  • Response interference and working memory in 12-year-old children

    J.F. Stins;J.C. Polderman;D.I. Boomsma;J.C.N. de Geus

Frequent Co-Authors

Dorret I. Boomsma
Dorret I. Boomsma Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Karin Roelofs
Karin Roelofs Radboud University
Eco J. C. de Geus
Eco J. C. de Geus Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Tinca J. C. Polderman
Tinca J. C. Polderman Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Frank C. Verhulst
Frank C. Verhulst Erasmus University Rotterdam
Steven P. R. Rose
Steven P. R. Rose The Open University
Tjeerd W. Boonstra
Tjeerd W. Boonstra Maastricht University
Paul Van de Heyning
Paul Van de Heyning University of Antwerp
Danielle Posthuma
Danielle Posthuma Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Tim Ambler
Tim Ambler London Business School

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens up a range of related degrees and diverse career pathways—including social work, counseling, and mental health services. Many students interested in psychology also consider pursuing social work, which can be rewarding in both professional growth and service to the community.

For those looking at in-person or blended learning environments, you can find the best-ranked social work degree programs in Duluth and top-ranked social work degree programs in North Carolina. Those in urban settings may explore popular social work degrees in Pittsburgh to launch or advance their careers.

Online degrees are also gaining popularity, making professional advancement more accessible. Individuals aiming for both flexibility and affordability should consider the best value online bsw degrees in Ohio as a pathway to social work roles. Whether you choose psychology or a related social science field, a variety of accredited online programs can help you reach your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing John F. Stins

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles