World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 47 6054 5631 285 274 118 13418

Tinca J. C. Polderman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tinca J. C. Polderman between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tinca J. C. Polderman published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 7 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2018. 28 of the 169 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2018. 2002: 2 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 18 publications
2002 2025

169 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tinca J. C. Polderman: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 2
2003 0
2004 1
2005 0
2006 6
2007 6
2008 6
2009 3
2010 5
2011 3
2012 2
2013 5
2014 4
2015 4
2016 4
2017 11
2018 21
2019 16
2020 13
2021 11
2022 12
2023 6
2024 10
2025 18
Total 169
Download as CSV

Tinca J. C. Polderman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tinca J. C. Polderman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 118 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 118
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Tinca J. C. Polderman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tinca J. C. Polderman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 47
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Tinca J. C. Polderman is affiliated with Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with significant contributions to clinical psychology, genetics, cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, as well as sociology and political science.

The scientist's work encompasses a range of topics including child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, COVID-19 and mental health, family support in illness, autism spectrum disorder research, genetic associations and epidemiology, genetics and neurodevelopmental disorders, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Notable recent publications include:

  • The impact of lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic on mental and social health of children and adolescents, 2021, Quality of Life Research
  • COVID-19 and child and adolescent psychiatry: an unexpected blessing for part of our population?, 2020, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • Systematic Review: How the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Polygenic Risk Score Adds to Our Understanding of ADHD and Associated Traits, 2021, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • Statistical and functional convergence of common and rare genetic influences on autism at chromosome 16p, 2022, Nature Genetics
  • Mental and Social Health of Children and Adolescents With Pre-existing Mental or Somatic Problems During the COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown, 2021, Frontiers in Psychiatry

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Polderman include Josjan Zijlmans, Arne Popma, Michiel A. J. Luijten, Hedy A. van Oers, and Jacintha M. Tieskens.

Their research has been published in several key venues, including:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • Autism
  • European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing

Best Publications

  • Genome-wide association meta-analysis in 269,867 individuals identifies new genetic and functional links to intelligence

    Jeanne E Savage;Philip R Jansen;Philip R Jansen;Sven Stringer;Kyoko Watanabe

  • Genome-wide analysis of insomnia in 1,331,010 individuals identifies new risk loci and functional pathways

    Jansen Pr;Watanabe K;Stringer S;Skene N

  • The genetic architecture of the human cerebral cortex

    Katrina L. Grasby;Neda Jahanshad;Jodie N. Painter;Lucía Colodro-Conde

  • Protein-altering variants associated with body mass index implicate pathways that control energy intake and expenditure in obesity

    Valérie Turcot;Yingchang Lu;Yingchang Lu;Heather M Highland;Heather M Highland;Claudia Schurmann

  • A systematic review of prospective studies on attention problems and academic achievement

    Tinca Polderman;Tinca Polderman;Dorret Boomsma;Meike Bartels;Frank Verhulst

  • Netherlands Twin Register: A Focus on Longitudinal Research

    Dorret I. Boomsma;Jacqueline M. Vink;Toos C. E .M. van Beijsterveldt;Eco J. C. de Geus

  • Netherlands Twin Register: A Focus on Longitudinal Research.

    Janine Stubbe;Dorret I. Boomsma;Jacqueline M. Vink;Toos C. E. M. van Beijsterveldt

  • Accounting for sequential trial effects in the flanker task: Conflict adaptation or associative priming?

    Sander Nieuwenhuis;John F. Stins;Danielle Posthuma;Tinca J. C. Polderman

  • The impact of lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic on mental and social health of children and adolescents.

    Michiel A. J. Luijten;Michiel A. J. Luijten;Maud M. van Muilekom;Lorynn Teela;Tinca J. C. Polderman

  • What Twin Studies Tell Us About the Heritability of Brain Development, Morphology, and Function: A Review

    Arija G. Jansen;Sabine E. Mous;Tonya White;Danielle Posthuma

  • Across the continuum of attention skills: a twin study of the SWAN ADHD rating scale.

    Tinca J.C. Polderman;Eske M. Derks;Jim J. Hudziak;Frank C. Verhulst

  • Genetic influences on eight psychiatric disorders based on family data of 4 408 646 full and half-siblings, and genetic data of 333 748 cases and controls

    E. Pettersson;P. Lichtenstein;H. Larsson;H. Larsson;J. Song

  • Genome-wide association studies of a broad spectrum of antisocial behavior

    Jorim J Tielbeek;Jorim J Tielbeek;Jorim J Tielbeek;Ada Johansson;Ada Johansson;Ada Johansson;Tinca J C Polderman;Marja-Riitta Rautiainen;Marja-Riitta Rautiainen;Marja-Riitta Rautiainen

  • A longitudinal twin study on IQ, executive functioning, and attention problems during childhood and early adolescence

    Tinca J C Polderman;M Florencia Gosso;Danielle Posthuma;Toos C E M Van Beijsterveldt

  • The Biological Contributions to Gender Identity and Gender Diversity: Bringing Data to the Table

    Tinca J.C. Polderman;Baudewijntje P.C. Kreukels;Michael S. Irwig;Lauren Beach

  • Meta-analysis of up to 622,409 individuals identifies 40 novel smoking behaviour associated genetic loci.

    A. Mesut Erzurumluoglu;Mengzhen Liu;Victoria E. Jackson;Victoria E. Jackson;Victoria E. Jackson;Daniel R. Barnes

  • Young Netherlands Twin Register (Y-NTR): A longitudinal multiple informant study of problem behavior.

    Meike Bartels;C E M van Beijsterveldt;Eske M Derks;Therese M Stroet

  • COVID-19 and child and adolescent psychiatry: an unexpected blessing for part of our population?

    Hilgo Bruining;Meike Bartels;Meike Bartels;Tinca J. C. Polderman;Arne Popma

  • The ongoing adaptive evolution of ASPM and Microcephalin is not explained by increased intelligence

    Nitzan Mekel-Bobrov;Danielle Posthuma;Sandra L. Gilbert;Penelope Lind

  • The co-occurrence of autistic and ADHD dimensions in adults: an etiological study in 17 770 twins

    T. J. C. Polderman;R. A. Hoekstra;D. Posthuma;Henrik Larsson

  • The impact of lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic on mental and social health of children and adolescents

    Michiel A. J. Luijten;Michiel A. J. Luijten;Maud M. van Muilekom;Lorynn Teela;Hedy A. van Oers

Frequent Co-Authors

Danielle Posthuma
Danielle Posthuma Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Dorret I. Boomsma
Dorret I. Boomsma Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Henning Tiemeier
Henning Tiemeier Harvard University
Nicholas G. Martin
Nicholas G. Martin QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Tonya White
Tonya White National Institutes of Health
Grant W. Montgomery
Grant W. Montgomery University of Queensland
Ian J. Deary
Ian J. Deary University of Edinburgh
John M. Starr
John M. Starr University of Edinburgh
Meike Bartels
Meike Bartels Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Gonçalo R. Abecasis
Gonçalo R. Abecasis University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees can open doors to a variety of career paths. Many students pursue counseling roles, where demand continues to rise. Each state has its own requirements and pathways—some offer accelerated programs or unique licensure routes that can speed up your journey.

If you’re interested in counseling, it’s helpful to compare how requirements differ across the country. For example, you can review the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Arizona or see the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Arkansas. On the West Coast, see the quickest path to becoming a counselor in California for state-specific details.

For those looking to fast-track their education, some states offer special options. Explore Colorado accelerated counseling programs to see how you might complete your degree or certification more quickly. Understanding these various routes can help you choose the best educational and career strategy in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Tinca J. C. Polderman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles