World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
77
Citations
21141
World Ranking
4785
National Ranking
2313

Q. Ping Dou publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Q. Ping Dou sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 240 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Q. Ping Dou D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Q. Ping Dou sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Q. Ping Dou is affiliated with Wayne State University in the United States and has a significant publication record spanning several research areas primarily within medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their work includes fields such as molecular biology, electrical and electronic engineering, oncology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and cell biology.

The scientist's research topics cover a diverse range, including:

  • Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Advanced MIMO systems optimization
  • Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis
  • RNA modifications and cancer
  • Autophagy in disease and therapy
  • Peptidase inhibition and analysis
  • Histone deacetylase inhibitors research

Q. Ping Dou has published extensively in several key venues, including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
  • Biomolecules
  • Recent Patents on Anti-Cancer Drug Discovery
  • Clinical Cancer Research

Recent notable papers include:

  • Connecting copper and cancer: from transition metal signalling to metalloplasia (2021) in Nature Reviews. Cancer
  • The role of ferroptosis in lung cancer (2021) in Biomarker Research
  • Recent Advances in Repurposing Disulfiram and Disulfiram Derivatives as Copper-Dependent Anticancer Agents (2021) in Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
  • Citrus peel flavonoid nobiletin alleviates lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation by activating IL-6/STAT3/FOXO3a-mediated autophagy (2020) in Food & Function
  • Updated review on green tea polyphenol epigallocatechin-3-gallate as a cancer epigenetic regulator (2021) in Seminars in Cancer Biology

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Q. Ping Dou include:

  • Wen G. Jiang
  • Elyas Khan
  • Xin Chen
  • Tracey A. Martin
  • Guanghua Yang

Best Publications

  • Connecting copper and cancer: from transition metal signalling to metalloplasia.

    Eva J Ge;Ashley I Bush;Angela Casini;Paul A Cobine

  • Bortezomib as the First Proteasome Inhibitor Anticancer Drug: Current Status and Future Perspectives

    D. Chen;M. Frezza;S. Schmitt;J. Kanwar

  • Broad targeting of resistance to apoptosis in cancer.

    Ramzi M. Mohammad;Irfana Muqbil;Leroy Lowe;Clement Yedjou

  • Novel metals and metal complexes as platforms for cancer therapy.

    Michael Frezza;Sarmad Hindo;Di Chen;Andrew Davenport

  • Novel Schiff base copper complexes of quinoline-2 carboxaldehyde as proteasome inhibitors in human prostate cancer cells.

    Shreelekha Adsule;Vivek Barve;Di Chen;Fakhara Ahmed

  • Dietary flavonoids as proteasome inhibitors and apoptosis inducers in human leukemia cells.

    Di Chen;Kenyon G. Daniel;Marina S. Chen;Deborah J. Kuhn

  • Designing a broad-spectrum integrative approach for cancer prevention and treatment

    Keith I. Block;Charlotte Gyllenhaal;Leroy Lowe;Amedeo Amedei

  • Curcumin Inhibits the Proteasome Activity in Human Colon Cancer Cells In vitro and In vivo

    Vesna Milacic;Sanjeev Banerjee;Kristin R. Landis-Piwowar;Fazlul H. Sarkar

  • Overview of Proteasome Inhibitor-Based Anti-cancer Therapies: Perspective on Bortezomib and Second Generation Proteasome Inhibitors versus Future Generation Inhibitors of Ubiquitin-Proteasome System

    Q. Ping Dou;Jeffrey A. Zonder

  • A novel prodrug of the green tea polyphenol (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate as a potential anticancer agent.

    Kristin R. Landis-Piwowar;Congde Huo;Di Chen;Vesna Milacic

  • Clioquinol, a Therapeutic Agent for Alzheimer's Disease, Has Proteasome-Inhibitory, Androgen Receptor–Suppressing, Apoptosis-Inducing, and Antitumor Activities in Human Prostate Cancer Cells and Xenografts

    Di Chen;Qiuzhi Cindy Cui;Huanjie Yang;Raul A. Barrea

  • Androgen Receptor– and E2F-1–Targeted Thymoquinone Therapy for Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer

    Ahmed O. Kaseb;Kannagi Chinnakannu;Di Chen;Arun Sivanandam

  • EGCG, GREEN TEA POLYPHENOLS AND THEIR SYNTHETIC ANALOGS AND PRODRUGS FOR HUMAN CANCER PREVENTION AND TREATMENT

    Di Chen;Sheng Biao Wan;Huanjie Yang;Jian Yuan

  • Ni(II), Cu(II), and Zn(II) diethyldithiocarbamate complexes show various activities against the proteasome in breast cancer cells.

    Boris Cvek;Vesna Milacic;Jan Taraba;Q. Ping Dou

  • Tea polyphenols, their biological effects and potential molecular targets

    Di Chen;Vesna Milacic;Marina Si Chen;Sheng Biao Wan

  • Metal complexes, their cellular targets and potential for cancer therapy.

    Di Chen;Vesna Milacic;Michael Frezza;Q. Ping Dou

  • A potential prodrug for a green tea polyphenol proteasome inhibitor: evaluation of the peracetate ester of (−)-epigallocatechin gallate [(−)-EGCG]

    Wai Har Lam;Aslamuzzaman Kazi;Deborah J. Kuhn;Larry M.C. Chow

  • Tumor Cellular Proteasome Inhibition and Growth Suppression by 8-Hydroxyquinoline and Clioquinol Requires Their Capabilities to Bind Copper and Transport Copper into Cells

    Shumei Zhai;Shumei Zhai;Lei Yang;Qiuzhi Cindy Cui;Ying Sun

  • The tumor proteasome as a novel target for gold(III) complexes: implications for breast cancer therapy

    Vesna Milacic;Q. Ping Dou

  • Shikonin exerts antitumor activity via proteasome inhibition and cell death induction in vitro and in vivo.

    Huanjie Yang;Ping Zhou;Hongbiao Huang;Di Chen

Frequent Co-Authors

Tak Hang Chan
Tak Hang Chan McGill University
Fazlul H. Sarkar
Fazlul H. Sarkar Wayne State University
Xuejun Wang
Xuejun Wang University of South Dakota
Harvey I. Pass
Harvey I. Pass New York University
Bing Yan
Bing Yan Griffith University
Jian Zuo
Jian Zuo University of Adelaide
Subhash Padhye
Subhash Padhye Savitribai Phule Pune University
Daolin Tang
Daolin Tang The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Mary Jane Heeg
Mary Jane Heeg Wayne State University
Sanjeev Banerjee
Sanjeev Banerjee Wayne State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens up numerous online degree and career options in growing healthcare and science fields. For those interested in patient care, pursuing an asn online program can be a practical starting point. This pathway offers foundational nursing skills that are in high demand across hospitals and clinics.

Nutrition is another expanding area. A quality online dietitian degree prepares students for roles in food science, healthcare, and public health, with flexible study options for working professionals.

If you’re aiming for leadership roles in healthcare, consider cahme-accredited online mha programs. These programs focus on management and administration, helping graduates oversee healthcare facilities or develop policy.

For advanced nursing professionals, an msn to dnp online no clinicals pathway provides doctoral-level expertise without traditional clinical hours, ideal for those who wish to focus on leadership, research, or education.

Best Scientists Citing Q. Ping Dou

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles