World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 52 13599 12242 3537 2893 288 8794

Mary Jane Heeg publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mary Jane Heeg between 1978 and 2017, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mary Jane Heeg published across 40 years, from 1978 to 2017, averaging 7.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2006. 1 of the 289 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2017. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2006. 1978: 4 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 3 publications 1981: 5 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 8 publications 1985: 7 publications 1986: 9 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 11 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 10 publications 1991: 11 publications 1992: 11 publications 1993: 12 publications 1994: 13 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 11 publications 1999: 16 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 17 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 0 publications 2017: 1 publication
1978 2017

289 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mary Jane Heeg: publications per year, 1978 to 2017
Year Publications
1978 4
1979 1
1980 3
1981 5
1982 2
1983 3
1984 8
1985 7
1986 9
1987 7
1988 11
1989 7
1990 10
1991 11
1992 11
1993 12
1994 13
1995 9
1996 7
1997 6
1998 11
1999 16
2000 6
2001 8
2002 6
2003 10
2004 8
2005 12
2006 17
2007 5
2008 8
2009 9
2010 3
2011 8
2012 6
2013 5
2014 3
2015 1
2016 0
2017 1
Total 289
Download as CSV

Mary Jane Heeg publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary Jane Heeg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 281–300 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 288 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939 288
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Mary Jane Heeg D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary Jane Heeg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872 52
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mary Jane Heeg is affiliated with Wayne State University in the United States. Their academic profile does not list specific recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues, which limits detailed insight into their publication output and collaboration network.

No information is available regarding the main fields, subfields, or topics of study that Mary Jane Heeg focuses on in their research activities. Likewise, there are no documented book publications or awards associated with this researcher.

The absence of detailed records on publications and research areas means that a comprehensive overview of Mary Jane Heeg's specific contributions within their academic field cannot be outlined at this time.

Best Publications

  • Influence of Coordination Geometry upon Copper(II/I) Redox Potentials. Physical Parameters for Twelve Copper Tripodal Ligand Complexes

    Unknown

  • A single-source precursor to titanium nitride thin films. Evidence for the intermediacy of imido complexes in the chemical vapor deposition process

    Charles H. Winter;Philip H. Sheridan;T. Suren Lewkebandara;Mary Jane Heeg

  • Metal-promoted higher-order cycloaddition reactions. Stereochemical, regiochemical, and mechanistic aspects of the [6.pi. + 4.pi.] reaction

    James H. Rigby;Humy S. Ateeq;Nelly R. Charles;Stephane V. Cuisiat

  • Decaphenylstannocene, [.eta.5-(C6H5)5C5]2SnII: the first synmetrical main-group sandwich compound

    Mary Jane Heeg;C. Janiak;J. J. Zuckerman

  • Endo-Selective Cyclization Pathways in the Intramolecular Heck Reaction

    James H. Rigby;Robert C. Hughes;Mary Jane Heeg

  • Metals in anticancer therapy: Copper(II) complexes as inhibitors of the 20S proteasome

    Sarmad Sahiel Hindo;Michael Frezza;Dajena Tomco;Mary Jane Heeg

  • Comparison of the influence of saturated nitrogen and sulfur donor atoms on the properties of copper(II/I)-macrocyclic polyamino polythiaether ligand complexes: redox potentials and protonation and stability constants of CuIL species and new structural data

    M. Margarida Bernardo;Mary Jane Heeg;Ronald R. Schroeder;L. A. Ochrymowycz

  • Terminal and Bridging Imido Complexes from Titanium Tetrachloride and Primary Amines. Implications for the Chemical Vapor Deposition of Titanium Nitride Films

    T. Suren Lewkebandara;Philip H. Sheridan;Mary Jane Heeg;Arnold L. Rheingold

  • Ruthenium Complexes Bearing η5-Pyrazolato Ligands

    Jayani R. Perera;Mary Jane Heeg;and H. Bernhard Schlegel;Charles H. Winter

  • Monomeric and Dimeric Amidinate Complexes of Magnesium

    Azwana R. Sadique;Mary Jane Heeg;Charles H. Winter

  • Combined Experimental and Computational Investigation of the Mechanism of Nickel-Catalyzed Three-Component Addition Processes

    Hrant P. Hratchian;Sanjoy K. Chowdhury;Victor M. Gutierrez-Garcia;Kande K. D. Amarasinghe

  • Synthesis and characterization of cationic technetium complexes of 1,2-bis(dimethylphosphino)ethane (DMPE). Structure determinations of trans-[TcV(DMPE)2(OH)(O)](F3CSO3)2, trans-[TcIII(DMPE)2Cl2]F3CSO3, and [TcI(DMPE)3]+ using x-ray diffraction, EXAFS, and technetium-99 NMR

    Jean Luc Vanderheyden;Alan R. Ketring;Karen Libson;Mary Jane Heeg

  • Novel Chemoselectivity and Stereochemical Aspects of Nickel-Catalyzed [2 + 2 + 2] Cycloadditions

    Jeongbeob Seo;Helen M. P. Chui;Mary Jane Heeg;John Montgomery

  • Synthesis, structure and properties of volatile lanthanide complexes containing amidinate ligands: application for Er2O3 thin film growth by atomic layer deposition

    Jani Päiväsaari;Charles L. Dezelah;Dwayne Back;Hani M. El-Kaderi

  • Comparison of the chemical and biological properties of trans-[Tc(DMPE)2Cl2]+ and trans-[Re(DMPE)2Cl2]+, where DMPE = 1,2-bis(dimethylphosphino)ethane. Single-crystal structural analysis of trans-[Re(DMPE)2Cl2]PF6

    Jean Luc Vanderheyden;Mary Jane Heeg;Edward Deutsch

  • Absolute configuration of (+)-α-dihydrotetrabenazine, an active metabolite of tetrabenazine

    Michael R. Kilbourn;Lihsueh C. Lee;Mary J. Heeg;Douglas M. Jewett

  • Influence of ligand rigidity and ring substitution on the structural and electronic behavior of trivalent iron and gallium complexes with asymmetric tridentate ligands.

    Camille Imbert;Hrant P. Hratchian;Mauricio Lanznaster;Mary Jane Heeg

  • Total Synthesis of (±)-Tazettine

    James H. Rigby;and Alexandre Cavezza;Mary Jane Heeg

  • Cyclopentadienylmetal trichloride formation versus metallocene dichloride formation in the reactions of silylated cyclopentadienes with zirconium and hafnium chlorides. Crystal structure of (1,3-bis(trimethylsilyl)cyclopentadienyl)titanium trichloride

    Charles H. Winter;Xiao Xing. Zhou;Daniel A. Dobbs;Mary Jane. Heeg

  • A CARBOHYDRATE-LINKED CISPLATIN ANALOGUE HAVING ANTITUMOR ACTIVITY

    Yongsheng Chen;Mary J. Heeg;Paul G. Braunschweiger;Wenhua Xie

  • Synthesis of [Co(CoL3)2]3+ by nitric acid oxidation of CoL3 (L = -SCH2CH2NH2) and induced electron transfer. Crystal structure of [Co(CoL3)2]2(SO4)Cl4

    Mary Jane Heeg;E. L. Blinn;Edward Deutsch

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles H. Winter
Charles H. Winter Wayne State University
Edward Deutsch
Edward Deutsch University of Cincinnati
H. Bernhard Schlegel
H. Bernhard Schlegel Wayne State University
Rajesh Kumar
Rajesh Kumar University of Johannesburg
William R. Heineman
William R. Heineman University of Cincinnati
Zhengkun Yu
Zhengkun Yu Chinese Academy of Sciences
Christoph Janiak
Christoph Janiak Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
John Montgomery
John Montgomery University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Herbert Schumann
Herbert Schumann Technical University of Berlin
Q. Ping Dou
Q. Ping Dou Wayne State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA can open doors to a variety of career pathways beyond traditional laboratory roles. Many students consider pursuing types of paralegals and salaries as a complementary option, especially those interested in legal aspects of chemical patents and regulations.

For those inclined towards the business side of science, becoming a pharmaceutical sales representative is a viable path. Understanding the pharma sales rep salary and career paths can help chemistry graduates align their career goals with industry needs effectively.

Additionally, Chemistry majors often explore healthcare professions such as pharmacy. The steps to become a pharmacist include advanced education and licensing, making it a rewarding yet rigorous path.

Another unique career option is working as an autopsy technician. Those curious about this specialty can learn about how much do autopsy techs make, which reflects the specialized skills tied to pathology and forensic chemistry.

Best Scientists Citing Mary Jane Heeg

Trending Scientists