World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
37
Citations
7074
World Ranking
8801
National Ranking
172

Joakim Langner publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joakim Langner sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 92 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Joakim Langner D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joakim Langner sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joakim Langner is a researcher affiliated with the Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute in Sweden. Their work predominantly spans environmental science and earth and planetary sciences, with a significant focus on atmospheric science and global and planetary change subfields.

The main topics of Langner's research include atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, air quality and health impacts, as well as atmospheric ozone and climate. Additional areas of study cover fire effects on ecosystems, methane hydrates and related phenomena, and atmospheric aerosols and clouds.

Langner has published research in several scientific venues. These include Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Atmospheric Environment, Communications Earth & Environment, Helda (University of Helsinki), and the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

  • Model evaluation of short-lived climate forcers for the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme: a multi-species, multi-model study (2022, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics)
  • Black carbon transport between Santiago de Chile and glaciers in the Andes Mountains (2020, Atmospheric Environment)
  • Atmospheric input of nitrogen to the Baltic Sea basin: present situation, variability due to meteorology and impact of climate change (2024, Helda [University of Helsinki])
  • Clean air policies are key for successfully mitigating Arctic warming (2022, Communications Earth & Environment)
  • Arctic tropospheric ozone: assessment of current knowledge and model performance (2023, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Langner include Michael Gauss, Svetlana Tsyro, Cynthia Whaley, Jesper Heile Christensen, and Kathy S. Law. These collaborations highlight a network within atmospheric sciences and environmental research.

Best Publications

  • Perturbation of the northern hemisphere radiative balance by backscattering from anthropogenic sulfate aerosols

    R. J. Charlson;J. Langner;H. Rodhe;C. B. Leovy

  • A global three-dimensional model of the tropospheric sulfur cycle

    J. Langner;H. Rodhe

  • Anthropogenic influence on the distribution of tropospheric sulphate aerosol

    Joakim Langner;H Rodhe;Pj Crutzen;P Zimmermann

  • An Eulerian Limited-Area Atmospheric Transport Model

    Lennart Robertson;Joakim Langner;Magnuz Engardt

  • Evaluation of long-term ozone simulations from seven regional air quality models and their ensemble

    M. van Loon;Robert Vautard;M. Schaap;R. Bergstrom

  • Response of Arctic temperature to changes in emissions of short-lived climate forcers

    M. Sand;T. K. Berntsen;K. von Salzen;M. G. Flanner

  • Sulphate aerosol and climate

    R. J. Charlson;J. Langner;H. Rodhe

  • Interannual variation and trends in air pollution over Europe due to climate variability during 1958–2001 simulated with a regional CTM coupled to the ERA40 reanalysis

    Camilla Andersson;Camilla Andersson;Joakim Langner;Robert Bergström

  • Impact of climate change on surface ozone and deposition of sulphur and nitrogen in Europe

    Joakim Langner;Robert Bergström;Valentin Foltescu

  • Current model capabilities for simulating black carbon and sulfate concentrations in the Arctic atmosphere: a multi-model evaluation using a comprehensive measurement data set

    S. Eckhardt;Boris Quennehen;Boris Quennehen;D. J. L. Olivié;T. K. Berntsen

  • Simulation of NOx and ultrafine particles in a street canyon in Stockholm, Sweden

    Lars Gidhagen;Lars Gidhagen;Christer Johansson;Joakim Langner;Gustavo Olivares

  • Impact of climate change on ozone-related mortality and morbidity in Europe

    Hans Orru;Hans Orru;Camilla Andersson;Kristie L Ebi;Joakim Langner

  • A multi-model study of impacts of climate change on surface ozone in Europe

    J. Langner;M. Engardt;A. Baklanov;J. H. Christensen

  • Urban scale modeling of particle number concentration in Stockholm

    Lars Gidhagen;Lars Gidhagen;Christer Johansson;Joakim Langner;Valentin Foltescu

  • Impacts of climate and emission changes on nitrogen deposition in Europe: a multi-model study

    David Simpson;David Simpson;Camilla Andersson;Jesper Heile Christensen;Magnuz Engardt

  • Past, present and future concentrations of ground-level ozone and potential impacts on ecosystems and human health in northern Europe.

    Per Erik Karlsson;Jenny Klingberg;Magnuz Engardt;Camilla Andersson

  • Multi-model study of chemical and physical controls on transport of anthropogenic and biomass burning pollution to the Arctic

    S. A. Monks;S. A. Monks;S. A. Monks;S. R. Arnold;L. K. Emmons;Kathy S. Law

  • Global scale transport of acidifying pollutants

    H Rodhe;Joakim Langner;L Gallardo;Erik Kjellström

  • The POLARCAT Model Intercomparison Project (POLMIP): Overview and Evaluation with Observations

    L. K. Emmons;S. R. Arnold;S. A. Monks;V. Huijnen

  • Changes in Nordic surface ozone episodes due to European emission reductions in the 1990s

    Sverre Solberg;Robert Bergström;Joakim Langner;Tuomas Laurila

  • AMAP Assessment 2015: Black carbon and ozone as Arctic climate forcers

    Patricia K. Quinn;Andreas Stohl;Steve Arnold;Alexander Baklanov

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert Bergström
Robert Bergström Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute
Jesper H. Christensen
Jesper H. Christensen Aarhus University
Mark Flanner
Mark Flanner University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Kathy S. Law
Kathy S. Law Université Paris Cité
Johannes Flemming
Johannes Flemming European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
Terje Berntsen
Terje Berntsen University of Oslo
Mikhail Sofiev
Mikhail Sofiev Finnish Meteorological Institute
Jørgen Brandt
Jørgen Brandt Aarhus University
David Simpson
David Simpson Chalmers University of Technology
Steve R. Arnold
Steve R. Arnold University of Leeds

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Programs like dsw online programs may seem unrelated at first but can complement environmental work by addressing social factors in sustainability and community health.

If you’re seeking flexibility with foundational knowledge, consider enrolling in one of the most affordable online general studies degree programs. These degrees provide a broad educational base useful in interdisciplinary environmental roles.

For those who prefer an easier academic load or wish to ease into higher education, the easy bachelor degrees list highlights programs that balance workload and learning outcomes, which can be ideal when juggling work or personal commitments.

Specializing more directly, pursuing a focused degree such as a geologist degree online can enhance technical expertise and job prospects in earth and environmental sciences. This pathway is particularly valuable for careers in natural resource management, environmental consulting, or climate research.

Best Scientists Citing Joakim Langner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles