World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Camilla Geels

Camilla Geels

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
50
Citations
8905
World Ranking
5010
National Ranking
66

Camilla Geels publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Camilla Geels sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 325 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Camilla Geels D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Camilla Geels sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Towards a climate-dependent paradigm of ammonia emission and deposition

    Mark A. Sutton;Stefan Reis;Stuart N. Riddick;Ulrike Dragosits

  • Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report:Assessment of global-scale model performance for global and regional ozone distributions, variability, and trends

    P. J. Young;V. Naik;A. M. Fiore;A. M. Fiore;A. Gaudel;A. Gaudel

  • Climate change exacerbates the environmental impacts of agriculture

    Unknown

  • TransCom model simulations of hourly atmospheric CO2 : Analysis of synoptic-scale variations for the period 2002-2003

    P. K. Patra;R. M. Law;Wouter Peters;Wouter Peters;C. RöDenbeck

  • An integrated model study for Europe and North America using the Danish Eulerian Hemispheric Model with focus on intercontinental transport of air pollution

    Jørgen Brandt;Jeremy David Silver;Lise Frohn;Camilla Geels

  • An integrated model study for Europe and North America using the Danish Eulerian Hemispheric Model with focus on intercontinental transport of air pollution

    J. Brandt;J.D. Silver;L.M. Frohn;C. Geels

  • Long-term residential exposure to PM2.5, PM10, black carbon, NO2, and ozone and mortality in a Danish cohort

    Ulla Arthur Hvidtfeldt;Mette Sørensen;Camilla Geels;Matthias Ketzel;Matthias Ketzel

  • Advances in air quality research – current and emerging challenges

    Unknown

  • Environmental pollution is associated with increased risk of psychiatric disorders in the US and Denmark.

    Atif Khan;Oleguer Plana-Ripoll;Oleguer Plana-Ripoll;Sussie Antonsen;Sussie Antonsen;Jørgen Brandt

  • Comparing atmospheric transport models for future regional inversions over Europe : part 1 : mapping the atmospheric CO2 signals

    C. Geels;M. Gloor;P. Ciais;P. Bousquet

  • TransCom model simulations of hourly atmospheric CO2: Experimental overview and diurnal cycle results for 2002

    R. M. Law;W. Peters;W. Peters;C. Rödenbeck;C. Aulagnier

  • Contribution from the ten major emission sectors in Europe and Denmark to the health-cost externalities of air pollution using the EVA model system - an integrated modelling approach

    J. Brandt;J. D. Silver;J. H. Christensen;M. S. Andersen

  • A multi-model study of impacts of climate change on surface ozone in Europe

    J. Langner;M. Engardt;A. Baklanov;J. H. Christensen

  • Spatial and temporal variations in ammonia emissions – a freely accessible model code for Europe

    Carsten Ambelas Skjøth;Camilla Geels;H Berge;Steen Gyldenkærne

  • Impacts of climate and emission changes on nitrogen deposition in Europe: a multi-model study

    David Simpson;David Simpson;Camilla Andersson;Jesper Heile Christensen;Magnuz Engardt

  • The effect of climate and climate change on ammonia emissions in Europe

    Carsten Skjoth;Carsten Skjoth;C. Geels

  • Assessment of past, present and future health-cost externalities of air pollution in Europe and the contribution from international ship traffic using the EVA model system

    J. Brandt;J. D. Silver;J. H. Christensen;M. S. Andersen

  • Identifying urban sources as cause of elevated grass pollen concentrations using GIS and remote sensing

    Carsten Skjoth;Carsten Skjoth;P. V. Orby;T. Becker;C. Geels

  • Europe-wide air pollution modeling from 2000 to 2019 using geographically weighted regression.

    Unknown

  • Estimating lockdown-induced European NO 2 changes using satellite and surface observations and air quality models

    Jérôme Barré;Hervé Petetin;Augustin Colette;Marc Guevara

Frequent Co-Authors

Jørgen Brandt
Jørgen Brandt Aarhus University
Jesper H. Christensen
Jesper H. Christensen Aarhus University
Ole Hertel
Ole Hertel Aarhus University
Carsten Ambelas Skjøth
Carsten Ambelas Skjøth Aarhus University
Matthias Ketzel
Matthias Ketzel University of Surrey
Ulas Im
Ulas Im Aarhus University
Torben Sigsgaard
Torben Sigsgaard Aarhus University
Ole Raaschou-Nielsen
Ole Raaschou-Nielsen Aarhus University
Jens Hesselbjerg Christensen
Jens Hesselbjerg Christensen University of Copenhagen
Carsten Bøcker Pedersen
Carsten Bøcker Pedersen Aarhus University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA opens the door to a variety of interdisciplinary career paths. Many students interested in the broader impact of environmental issues also consider degrees in related social sciences. For those looking to expand their skill set, pursuing one of the best online sociology bachelor degree programs can provide valuable insights into human behavior and societal impacts on the environment.

For professionals aiming to advance their expertise, doctoral degrees offer a way to contribute research and leadership in environmental policy and education. Some prefer to enroll in doctorate degree online no dissertation programs, which can accommodate working professionals by focusing on practical application rather than lengthy research projects.

Accreditation is essential when selecting advanced education options. Many students transition through accredited eds to edd programs to ensure their credentials meet professional standards and enhance career prospects in educational and environmental leadership roles.

Additionally, specialized fields like social work intersect with environmental justice. Aspiring experts can benefit from exploring fully funded dsw programs, which reduce financial barriers and support advanced learning geared toward community and environmental wellbeing.

Best Scientists Citing Camilla Geels

Recently Published Articles