World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
9925
World Ranking
10999
National Ranking
4578

Jeff Burke publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeff Burke sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 113 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jeff Burke D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeff Burke sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jeff Burke is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States and contributes to the field of Computer Science with a focus on various subfields including Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems, Safety Research, Management Information Systems, and Sociology and Political Science.

Their research encompasses a range of topics such as:

  • Caching and Content Delivery
  • Peer-to-Peer Network Technologies
  • Advanced Data Storage Technologies
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Big Data and Business Intelligence
  • Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
  • Cloud Data Security Solutions

Jeff Burke has authored papers across several publication venues, with notable frequent contributions including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Computer Networks
  • Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment

Their recent publications illustrate an interdisciplinary approach combining technical and societal perspectives. These include:

  • Next Steps for Human-Centered Generative AI: A Technical Perspective, 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • A Quadtree-based synchronization protocol for inter-server game state synchronization, 2020, Computer Networks
  • Secure Web Objects: Building Blocks for Metaverse Interoperability and Decentralization, 2024, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IN SITU RB-SR MICA GEOCHRONOLOGY OF WESTERN MAINE PLUTONS, 2025, Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America
  • Xanadu: Generative Media Pipelines for Immersive Participatory Theater, 2025, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment

Collaborative work is a part of their scholarly output, with frequent coauthors including Philipp Moll, Selina Isak, Hermann Hellwagner, Xiang Chen, and Ruofei Du.

Best Publications

  • Named data networking

    Lixia Zhang;Alexander Afanasyev;Jeffrey Burke;Van Jacobson

  • Named Data Networking (NDN) Project

    Lixia Zhang;Deborah Estrin;Jeffrey Burke;Van Jacobson

  • Using mobile phones to determine transportation modes

    Sasank Reddy;Min Mun;Jeff Burke;Deborah Estrin

  • PEIR, the personal environmental impact report, as a platform for participatory sensing systems research

    Min Mun;Sasank Reddy;Katie Shilton;Nathan Yau

  • Mobiscopes for Human Spaces

    Tarek Abdelzaher;Yaw Anokwa;Peter Boda;Jeffrey A Burke

  • Image browsing, processing, and clustering for participatory sensing: lessons from a DietSense prototype

    Sasank Reddy;Andrew Parker;Josh Hyman;Jeff Burke

  • Participatory Sensing: A Citizen-Powered Approach to Illuminating the Patterns that Shape our World

    Jeffrey Goldman;Katie Shilton;Jeffrey A. Burke;Deborah Estrin

  • Personal data vaults: a locus of control for personal data streams

    Min Mun;Shuai Hao;Nilesh Mishra;Katie Shilton

  • Securing building management systems using named data networking

    Wentao Shang;Qiuhan Ding;Alessandro Marianantoni;Jeff Burke

  • Determining transportation mode on mobile phones

    S. Reddy;J. Burke;D. Estrin;M. Hansen

  • A Brief Introduction to Named Data Networking

    Alex Afanasyev;Jeff Burke;Tamer Refaei;Lan Wang

  • Securing instrumented environments over content-centric networking: the case of lighting control and NDN

    Jeff Burke;Paolo Gasti;Naveen Nathan;Gene Tsudik

  • A survey of mobility support in Named Data Networking

    Yu Zhang;Alexander Afanasyev;Jeff Burke;Lixia Zhang

  • Feasibility testing of an automated image-capture method to aid dietary recall.

    Lenore Arab;Deborah Estrin;Donnie H. Kim;Jeff Burke

  • Design and implementation of a wireless sensor network for intelligent light control

    Heemin Park;Jeff Burke;Mani B. Srivastava

  • Named Data Networking of Things (Invited Paper)

    Wentao Shang;Adeola Bannis;Teng Liang;Zhehao Wang

  • Parsimonious Mobility Classification using GSM and WiFi Traces

    Min Y. Mun;Deborah Estrin;Jeff Burke;Mark Hansen

  • NDN-RTC: Real-Time Videoconferencing over Named Data Networking

    Peter Gusev;Jeff Burke

  • A framework for data quality and feedback in participatory sensing

    Sasank Reddy;Jeff Burke;Deborah Estrin;Mark Hansen

  • Using Context Annotated Mobility Profiles to Recruit Data Collectors in Participatory Sensing

    Sasank Reddy;Katie Shilton;Jeff Burke;Deborah Estrin

Frequent Co-Authors

Deborah Estrin
Deborah Estrin Cornell University
Mani Srivastava
Mani Srivastava University of California, Los Angeles
Lixia Zhang
Lixia Zhang University of California, Los Angeles
Beichuan Zhang
Beichuan Zhang University of Arizona
Tarek Abdelzaher
Tarek Abdelzaher University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Lan Wang
Lan Wang University of Memphis
Van Jacobson
Van Jacobson University of California, Los Angeles
Gene Tsudik
Gene Tsudik University of California, Irvine
Ramesh Govindan
Ramesh Govindan University of Southern California
Hermann Hellwagner
Hermann Hellwagner University of Klagenfurt

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education offers a flexible path for those seeking a career in Computer Science or related technology fields. Today, you can accelerate your career by considering various online degrees and certifications that align with your goals and schedule.

For quick entry or advancement in tech roles, 3-month certificate programs that pay well can provide targeted skills and immediate job prospects without the long commitment of a traditional degree. If you’re interested in building foundational knowledge, online associates programs are a popular starting point and a stepping stone toward higher degrees.

For those aiming to fast-track their education, the quickest online masters degree options let you complete advanced studies in a shorter timeframe, often within a year. Choosing the right graduate program is crucial—explore the best masters degree to get for your professional ambitions to boost your job prospects and salary potential.

Each of these educational pathways can open doors to rewarding roles in software development, cybersecurity, data analysis, and other tech-driven careers.

Best Scientists Citing Jeff Burke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles