World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 37 6046 5617 2882 2629 70 16393

Jane Allyn Piliavin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jane Allyn Piliavin between 1969 and 2017, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jane Allyn Piliavin published across 49 years, from 1969 to 2017, averaging 1.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2017. 9 of the 71 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1969 to 2017. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2017. 1969: 2 publications 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 4 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 0 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 2 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 2 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 4 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 1 publication 2017: 8 publications
1969 2017

71 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jane Allyn Piliavin: publications per year, 1969 to 2017
Year Publications
1969 2
1970 1
1971 0
1972 4
1973 1
1974 0
1975 1
1976 1
1977 0
1978 2
1979 0
1980 0
1981 1
1982 2
1983 1
1984 2
1985 1
1986 1
1987 4
1988 2
1989 1
1990 2
1991 2
1992 2
1993 0
1994 1
1995 1
1996 0
1997 1
1998 2
1999 2
2000 1
2001 2
2002 1
2003 2
2004 2
2005 2
2006 2
2007 2
2008 2
2009 2
2010 1
2011 0
2012 0
2013 2
2014 0
2015 1
2016 1
2017 8
Total 71
Download as CSV

Jane Allyn Piliavin publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane Allyn Piliavin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 64–73 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 70 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161 70
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Jane Allyn Piliavin D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane Allyn Piliavin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272 37
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Jane Allyn Piliavin is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their professional work is associated primarily with this institution, reflecting a sustained academic connection.

No recent papers, co-authors, or specific publication venues are listed for Jane Allyn Piliavin in the provided data. Similarly, there is no information on book publications or distinct fields and subfields of study.

Available data does not specify particular main topics of their research work, nor are awards or notable recognitions mentioned in the current profile.

This profile focuses solely on the verifiable affiliation and the absence of additional documented research outputs or collaborations in the provided source.

Best Publications

  • Prosocial Behavior: Multilevel Perspectives

    Louis A. Penner.;John F. Dovidio.;Jane A. Piliavin.;David A. Schroeder.

  • Values: Reviving a Dormant Concept

    Steven Hitlin;Jane Allyn Piliavin

  • The Social Psychology of Prosocial Behavior

    John F. Dovidio;Jane Allyn Piliavin;David A. Schroeder;Louis A. Penner

  • Altruism: A Review of Recent Theory and Research

    Jane Allyn Piliavin;Hong-Wen Charng

  • Role identity and reasoned action in the prediction of repeated behavior

    Hong-Wen Charng;Jane Allyn Piliavin;Peter L. Callero

  • Giving Blood: The Development Of An Altruistic Identity

    Jane Allyn Piliavin;Peter L. Callero

  • GOOD SAMARITANISM: AN UNDERGROUND PHENOMENON?1

    Irving M. Piliavin;Judith Rodin;Jane Allyn Piliavin

  • Role Identity, Organizational Experiences, and Volunteer Performance

    Jean A. Grube;Jane Allyn Piliavin

  • The psychology of helping and altruism: Problems and puzzles.

    David A. Schroeder;Louis A. Penner;John F. Dovidio;Jane A. Piliavin

  • Health benefits of volunteering in the Wisconsin longitudinal study.

    Jane Allyn Piliavin;Erica Siegl

  • Helping behavior as role behavior: Disclosing social structure and history in the analysis of prosocial action.

    Peter L. Callero;Judith A. Howard;Jane A. Piliavin

  • Giving time, money, and blood: Similarities and differences.

    Lichang Lee;Jane Allyn Piliavin;Vaughn R. A. Call

  • Why do they give the gift of life? A review of research on blood donors since 1977

    Piliavin Ja

  • The arousal: Cost-reward model and the process of intervention: A review of the evidence.

    John F. Dovidio;Jane A. Piliavin;Samuel L. Gaertner;David A. Schroeder

  • Role as Resource for Action in Public Service

    Jane Allyn Piliavin;Jean A. Grube;Peter L. Callero

  • Costs, diffusion, and the stigmatized victim.

    Irving M. Piliavin;Jane A. Piliavin;Judith Rodin

  • Effect of blood on reactions to a victim.

    Jane A. Piliavin;Irving M. Piliavin

  • First year donation patterns predict long-term commitment for first-time donors

    G. B. Schreiber;U. K. Sharma;D. J. Wright;S. A. Glynn

  • "Playing hard to get": Understanding an elusive phenomenon.

    Elaine Walster;G. William Walster;Jane Piliavin;Lynn Schmidt

  • The effects of the sex composition of groups on style of social interaction.

    Jane Allyn Piliavin;Rachel Rosemann Martin

Frequent Co-Authors

John F. Dovidio
John F. Dovidio Yale University
Louis A. Penner
Louis A. Penner Wayne State University
Robert L. Stout
Robert L. Stout Brown University
Samuel L. Gaertner
Samuel L. Gaertner University of Delaware
Katharine A. Phillips
Katharine A. Phillips Cornell University
Elaine Walster
Elaine Walster University of Wisconsin–Madison
Judith Rodin
Judith Rodin Rockefeller Foundation
Jeffrey D. Fisher
Jeffrey D. Fisher University of Connecticut
Bella M. DePaulo
Bella M. DePaulo University of California, Santa Barbara
Arie Nadler
Arie Nadler Tel Aviv University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA unlocks diverse academic and career possibilities. Online degree options have expanded, offering affordability, flexibility, and faster completion times for busy students and working professionals.

For those interested in social work, there are now a range of msw online programs that combine quality with affordability. If you wish to specialize further, consider exploring bcba online masters programs for careers in behavioral analysis and therapy.

Accelerated paths are popular for students eager to join the workforce quicker. Programs such as 1 year msw programs make it possible for you to earn a master’s degree in as little as one year. Similarly, those interested in psychology will find a range of fastest online psychology degree options, helping you start your career sooner.

Each of these online pathways is designed to balance convenience, cost, and academic quality, strengthening your prospects in the Social Sciences and Humanities fields.

Best Scientists Citing Jane Allyn Piliavin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles