World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 39 5583 5180 222 209 200 8175

Jan Oosterhaven publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jan Oosterhaven between 1978 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jan Oosterhaven published across 47 years, from 1978 to 2024, averaging 4.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2003. 3 of the 226 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2003. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 5 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 14 publications 2003: 15 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 8 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 15 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 11 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 2 publications
1978 2024

226 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jan Oosterhaven: publications per year, 1978 to 2024
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 5
1980 3
1981 4
1982 0
1983 3
1984 1
1985 1
1986 0
1987 1
1988 1
1989 2
1990 3
1991 0
1992 2
1993 2
1994 4
1995 2
1996 8
1997 2
1998 6
1999 8
2000 9
2001 13
2002 14
2003 15
2004 6
2005 11
2006 7
2007 6
2008 6
2009 10
2010 1
2011 8
2012 3
2013 7
2014 7
2015 3
2016 2
2017 6
2018 1
2019 15
2020 2
2021 1
2022 11
2023 1
2024 2
Total 226
Download as CSV

Jan Oosterhaven publications per year - data summary

  • Jan Oosterhaven, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Groningen, has 226 publications recorded across 47 years, from 1978 to 2024.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1978 and the most recent to 2024.
  • The most productive years are 2003 and 2019, with 15 publications each.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1978, 1984, 1985, 1987 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 3 of the 47 years in the span carry no publications at all (1982, 1986 and 1991).
  • The rate of publication averages 4.8 papers per year over the whole span, or 5.1 per year counting only the 44 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2020-2024) hold 17 publications, 8% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1978-1993: 29 publications (1.8 per year); 1994-2009: 127 publications (7.9 per year); 2010-2024: 70 publications (4.7 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Jan Oosterhaven publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Oosterhaven sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 194–203 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 200 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304 200
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Jan Oosterhaven publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Jan Oosterhaven, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Groningen, records 200 publications - the 64th percentile of the discipline.
  • 64% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Jan Oosterhaven, and about 36% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Jan Oosterhaven ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Jan Oosterhaven D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Oosterhaven sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300 39
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Jan Oosterhaven D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Jan Oosterhaven, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Groningen, records 39 D-Index - the 30th percentile of the discipline.
  • 30% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Jan Oosterhaven, and about 70% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Jan Oosterhaven ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Jan Oosterhaven is affiliated with the University of Groningen in the Netherlands. Their research spans fields such as Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Environmental Science, and Decision Sciences. Within these fields, their work focuses on subfields including Economics and Econometrics, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Environmental Engineering, Management Science and Operations Research, and Aerospace Engineering.

Oosterhaven's research topics cover various areas, with significant attention to Economic Growth and Productivity, Environmental Impact and Sustainability, Regional Economic and Spatial Analysis, Monetary Policy and Economic Impact, Climate Change Policy and Economics, Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth, and Multi-Criteria Decision Making.

Several recent papers authored by Oosterhaven illustrate the scope of their research contributions:

  • A multi-regional generalized RAS updating technique, 2020, Spatial Economic Analysis
  • Price re-interpretations of the basic IO quantity models result in the ultimate input-output equations, 2023, Economic Systems Research
  • A decomposition of economic growth decompositions, 2024, The Annals of Regional Science
  • Note on Mathematics Versus Economics of Input-Output Models, 2024, SSRN Electronic Journal

Oosterhaven frequently collaborates with other researchers, including:

  • Umed Temursho
  • Manuel Alejandro Cardenete

The primary publication venues for Oosterhaven's work consist of Spatial Economic Analysis, Economic Systems Research, The Annals of Regional Science, and SSRN Electronic Journal.

In addition to articles, Oosterhaven has contributed to book literature. One notable publication is:

  • Rethinking Input-Output Analysis, published by Springer Nature in 2022

Best Publications

  • Annual Report 2008

    Jan Oosterhaven;Norbert Rainer;Thijs ten Raa;Joaquim Jose Martins Guilhoto

  • EXIOPOL – DEVELOPMENT AND ILLUSTRATIVE ANALYSES OF A DETAILED GLOBAL MR EE SUT/IOT

    Arnold Tukker;Arnold Tukker;Arjan de Koning;Richard Wood;Troy Hawkins

  • ON THE PLAUSIBILITY OF THE SUPPLY-DRIVEN INPUT-OUTPUT MODEL

    Jan Oosterhaven

  • On the measurement of comparative advantage

    Alex R. Hoen;Jan Oosterhaven

  • Towards a global multi-regional environmentally extended input-output database

    Arnold Tukker;Evgueni Poliakov;Reinout Heijungs;Troy Hawkins

  • Leontief versus Ghoshian Price and Quantity Models

    Jan Oosterhaven

  • The solution of updating or regionalizing a matrix with both positive and negative entries

    Theo Junius;Jan Oosterhaven

  • THE SUPPLY-DRIVEN INPUT-OUTPUT MODEL - A NEW INTERPRETATION BUT STILL IMPLAUSIBLE

    Jan Oosterhaven

  • Net Multipliers Avoid Exaggerating Impacts: With A Bi–Regional Illustration for the Dutch Transportation Sector

    Jan Oosterhaven;Dirk Stelder

  • Spatial Economic Impacts of Transport Infrastructure Investments

    Jan Oosterhaven;Thijs Knaap

  • Interregional input-output analysis and Dutch regional policy problems

    Jan Oosterhaven

  • Handbook of regional science

    G.J.D. Hewings;Jan Oosterhaven

  • Regional labor productivity in The Netherlands: Evidence of agglomeration and congestion effects

    Lourens Broersma;Jan Oosterhaven

  • Clusters, Linkages and Interregional Spillovers: Methodology and Policy Implications for the Two Dutch Mainports and the Rural North

    Jan Oosterhaven;Gerard J. Eding;Dirk Stelder

  • A double‐entry method for the construction of bi‐regional input‐output tables

    Piet Boomsma;Jan Oosterhaven

  • A FAMILY OF SQUARE AND RECTANGULAR INTERREGIONAL INPUT-OUTPUT TABLES AND MODELS

    Jan Oosterhaven

  • European technology, trade and income changes for 1975-95: an intercountry input-output decomposition

    Jan Oosterhaven;J.A. van der Linden

  • A new approach to modelling the impact of disruptive events

    Jan Oosterhaven;Maaike C. Bouwmeester

  • Preferences, technology, trade and real income changes in the European Union An intercountry decomposition analysis for 1975–1985

    Jan Oosterhaven;Alex R. Hoen

  • Specification and Aggregation Errors in Environmentally Extended Input-Output Models

    Maaike C. Bouwmeester;Jan Oosterhaven

  • Impact of international tourism on the Chinese economy

    Jan Oosterhaven;Tianhu Fan

  • European Community Intercountry Input–Output Relations: Construction Method and Main Results for 1965–85

    Jan A. Van Der Linden;Jan Oosterhaven

  • THEORY AND PRACTICE OF UPDATING REGIONAL VERSUS INTERREGIONAL INTERINDUSTRY TABLES

    Jan Oosterhaven;Gerrit Piek;Dirk Stelder

  • Spatial Economic Structure and Structural Changes in the EC: Feedback Loop Input–Output Analysis

    Michael Sonis;Jan Oosterhaven;Geoffrey J. D. Hewings

  • A family of square and rectangular interregional input-output tables and models

    J. Oosterhaven;H.D. Kurz;C. Lager;H.W.A. Dietzenbacher

Frequent Co-Authors

J. Paul Elhorst
J. Paul Elhorst University of Groningen
Geoffrey J. D. Hewings
Geoffrey J. D. Hewings University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Erik Dietzenbacher
Erik Dietzenbacher University of Groningen
Arnold Tukker
Arnold Tukker Leiden University
Piet Rietveld
Piet Rietveld Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Bart Los
Bart Los University of Groningen
Peter Nijkamp
Peter Nijkamp Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Reinout Heijungs
Reinout Heijungs Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Klaus Hubacek
Klaus Hubacek University of Groningen
Harry J. Wichers
Harry J. Wichers Wageningen University & Research

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and flexible career options. Many students today seek convenient, accredited programs that can be completed from anywhere—especially in fields like counseling, therapy, psychology, and social work.

If you are interested in professional counseling, check out cacrep accredited schools for affordable, fully online options that meet key licensure requirements. For those who want to focus on helping families and couples, you can pursue a marriage and family therapy degree online—an in-demand specialty that blends psychological insight with practical support.

Students interested in broader mental health services should explore the most affordable online psychology degree options available today. Psychology majors can branch into research, human resources, counseling, and more. Additionally, those aiming for social work roles with community impact may find a good match with online msw programs designed for accessibility and robust career preparation.

Each of these online pathways offers distinct advantages and routes into meaningful, people-centered professions both within and beyond the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Jan Oosterhaven

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles