World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
46
Citations
6721
World Ranking
4697
National Ranking
123

Jan A. van Gils publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan A. van Gils sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 116 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Jan A. van Gils D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan A. van Gils sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jan A. van Gils is affiliated with the Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with a substantial body of work in related subfields such as Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography, and Ecological Modeling.

The scientist's work encompasses a range of topics including Species Distribution and Climate Change, Avian ecology and behavior, Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Marine Biology and Ecology Research, Animal Behavior and Reproduction, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, and Marine and fisheries research.

Jan A. van Gils has published extensively, with a number of recent papers illustrating key areas of their research:

  • "Exploring the drivers of variation in trophic mismatches: A systematic review of long-term avian studies" (2021, Ecology and Evolution)
  • "Global biogeography of chemosynthetic symbionts reveals both localized and globally distributed symbiont groups" (2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • "Individual-Level Memory Is Sufficient to Create Spatial Segregation among Neighboring Colonies of Central Place Foragers" (2021, The American Naturalist)
  • "Mismatch-induced growth reductions in a clade of Arctic-breeding shorebirds are rarely mitigated by increasing temperatures" (2021, Global Change Biology)
  • "Migratory vertebrates shift migration timing and distributions in a warming Arctic" (2021, Animal Migration)

The scientist regularly contributes to a variety of academic venues. Frequent publication platforms include Birds of the World, SSRN Electronic Journal, Ecology and Evolution, Global Change Biology, and Hydrobiologia.

Jan A. van Gils collaborates with several coauthors often contributing to their research output. Frequent coauthors include Popko Wiersma, Guy M. Kirwan, Mikhail K. Zhemchuzhnikov, Theunis Piersma, and Dmitry Kutcherov.

In addition to articles, Jan A. van Gils has published books, including a work under the University of Groningen Press titled Aanpassingen van trekvogels aan een snel veranderende wereld published in 2022.

Best Publications

  • The Flexible Phenotype: A Body-Centred Integration of Ecology, Physiology, and Behaviour

    Theunis Piersma;Jan A. van Gils

  • The ecology of information: an overview on the ecological significance of making informed decisions

    Kenneth A. Schmidt;Sasha R. X. Dall;Jan A. Van Gils

  • A Three-Stage Symbiosis Forms the Foundation of Seagrass Ecosystems

    Tjisse van der Heide;Laura L. Govers;Jimmy de Fouw;Han Olff

  • Hampered Foraging and Migratory Performance in Swans Infected with Low-Pathogenic Avian Influenza A Virus

    Jan A. van Gils;Vincent J. Munster;Reinder Radersma;Daan Liefhebber

  • Body shrinkage due to Arctic warming reduces red knot fitness in tropical wintering range

    Jan A. van Gils;Simeon Lisovski;Tamar Lok;Tamar Lok;Włodzimierz Meissner

  • Foraging in a tidally structured environment by red knots (Calidris canutus): Ideal, but not free

    Jan A. van Gils;Bernard Spaans;Anne Dekinga;Theunis Piersma

  • Cost-benefit analysis of mollusc-eating in a shorebird II : Optimizing gizzard size in the face of seasonal demands

    Jan A. van Gils;Theunis Piersma;Anne Dekinga;Maurine W. Dietz

  • Digestive bottleneck affects foraging decisions in red knots Calidris canutus. I. Prey choice

    Jan A. Van Gils;Sem R. De Rooij;Jelmer Van Belle;Jaap Van Der Meer

  • Family Scolopacidae (sandpipers, snipes and phalaropes)

    Theun Piersma;Jan A. van Gils;Popko Wiersma

  • Shellfish dredging pushes a flexible avian top predator out of a marine protected area.

    Jan A van Gils;Theunis Piersma;Anne Dekinga;Bernard Spaans

  • High-tide habitat choice: insights from modelling roost selection by shorebirds around a tropical bay

    Danny I. Rogers;Phil F. Battley;Theunis Piersma;Jan A. Van Gils

  • Digestive bottleneck affects foraging decisions in red knots Calidris canutus. II. Patch choice and length of working day

    Jan A. Van Gils;Anne Dekinga;Bernard Spaans;Wouter K. Vahl

  • Holling's functional response model as a tool to link the food-finding mechanism of a probing shorebird with its spatial distribution

    Theunis Piersma;Jan van Gils;Petra de Goeij;Jaap van der Meer

  • Incompletely Informed Shorebirds That Face a Digestive Constraint Maximize Net Energy Gain When Exploiting Patches

    Jan A. van Gils;Ingrid W. Schenk;Oscar Bos;Theunis Piersma

  • Landscape-scale experiment demonstrates that Wadden Sea intertidal flats are used to capacity by molluscivore migrant shorebirds.

    Casper Kraan;Jan A. van Gils;Bernard Spaans;Anne Dekinga

  • Reinterpretation of gizzard sizes of red knots world-wide emphasises overriding importance of prey quality at migratory stopover sites.

    Jan A van Gils;Phil F Battley;Theunis Piersma;Rudi Drent

  • Designing a benthic monitoring programme with multiple conflicting objectives

    Allert I. Bijleveld;Jan A. van Gils;Jaap van der Meer;Anne Dekinga

  • Beyond the information centre hypothesis: communal roosting for information on food, predators, travel companions and mates?

    Allert I. Bijleveld;Martijn Egas;Jan A. van Gils;Theunis Piersma

  • Fuelling conditions at staging sites can mitigate Arctic warming effects in a migratory bird

    Eldar Rakhimberdiev;Sjoerd Duijns;Julia Karagicheva;Cornelis J. Camphuysen

  • Chronobiology of interspecific interactions in a changing world

    Noga Kronfeld-Schor;Marcel E. Visser;Lucia Salis;Jan A. van Gils

  • Digestively constrained predators evade the cost of interference competition

    Jan A. Van Gils;Theunis Piersma

  • Supplementary Material for A Three-Stage Symbiosis Forms the Foundation of Seagrass Ecosystems

    Tjisse van der Heide;Laura L. Govers;Jimmy de Fouw;Han Olff

Frequent Co-Authors

Theunis Piersma
Theunis Piersma University of Groningen
Anne Dekinga
Anne Dekinga Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research
Tjisse van der Heide
Tjisse van der Heide Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research
Han Olff
Han Olff University of Groningen
Johan van de Koppel
Johan van de Koppel Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research
Henk W. van der Veer
Henk W. van der Veer Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research
Brian R. Silliman
Brian R. Silliman Duke University
Phil F. Battley
Phil F. Battley Massey University
Tomáš Albrecht
Tomáš Albrecht Charles University
Andrew H. Altieri
Andrew H. Altieri University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths—often intersecting with fields like healthcare, education, and design. For those interested in the psychological aspects of human behavior in relation to the environment, exploring clinical psychology master's programs online can be a natural complement. These programs allow flexible learning and a deeper understanding of behavioral ecology.

Many students seek broader, people-focused roles in the community. An online degree in human services is a fast, practical option for those wanting to address social and environmental challenges directly.

Education professionals might consider transitioning careers altogether. Shifting from teaching into speech pathology is one such route—see how you can make a teacher to speech pathologist career change to integrate communication science and environmental awareness in outreach programs.

Lastly, sustainability and design go hand-in-hand. Interested in eco-friendly building or landscape design? An online architecture school can give you the skills to create sustainable, nature-inspired spaces, supporting both human communities and the ecosystems that surround them.

Best Scientists Citing Jan A. van Gils

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles