World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jacob Kraemer Tebes

Jacob Kraemer Tebes

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
6681
World Ranking
8551
National Ranking
4573

Jacob Kraemer Tebes publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacob Kraemer Tebes sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 105 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jacob Kraemer Tebes D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacob Kraemer Tebes sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2000 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Jacob Kraemer Tebes is affiliated with Yale University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology, medicine, and health professions, with a particular focus on clinical psychology, general health professions, psychiatry and mental health, social psychology, and public health.

Their work concentrates on several main topics, including family caregiving in mental illness, schizophrenia research and treatment, mental health treatment and access, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, health policy implementation science, maternal mental health during pregnancy and postpartum, and the impact of COVID-19 on mental health.

Recent publications by Jacob Kraemer Tebes include the following:

  • Psychometric Properties of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) Among Family Caregivers of People with Schizophrenia in China, 2021, Psychology Research and Behavior Management
  • Associations of Caregiving Knowledge and Skills With Caregiver Burden, Psychological Well-Being, and Coping Styles Among Primary Family Caregivers of People Living With Schizophrenia in China, 2021, Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • "What Does it Mean to be Trauma-Informed?": A Mixed-Methods Study of a Trauma-Informed Community Initiative, 2022, Journal of Child and Family Studies
  • A cross-sectional study on spouse and parent differences in caregiving experiences of people living with schizophrenia in rural China, 2020, BMC Psychiatry
  • A comparison of psychometric properties of two common measures of caregiving burden: the family burden interview schedule (FBIS-24) and the Zarit caregiver burden interview (ZBI-22), 2020, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Jacob Kraemer Tebes collaborates frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Yu Yu
  • Shuiyuan Xiao
  • Tongxin Li
  • Shi-jun Xi
  • Yilu Li

Their research has appeared in various publication venues, with multiple contributions in:

  • General Hospital Psychiatry
  • American Psychologist
  • Research Square
  • Psychology Research and Behavior Management
  • Journal of Child and Family Studies

Jacob Kraemer Tebes was recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2000.

Best Publications

  • Peer Support Among Individuals With Severe Mental Illness: A Review of the Evidence

    Larry Davidson;Matthew Chinman;Bret Kloos;Richard Weingarten

  • Historical trauma as public narrative: a conceptual review of how history impacts present-day health.

    Nathaniel Vincent Mohatt;Azure B. Thompson;Nghi D. Thai;Jacob Kraemer Tebes

  • Re-referral to child protective services: the influence of child, family, and case characteristics on risk status.

    Christian M. Connell;Natasha Bergeron;Karol H. Katz;Leon Saunders

  • Supported socialization for people with psychiatric disabilities: Lessons from a randomized controlled trial

    Larry Davidson;Golan Shahar;David A. Stayner;Matthew J. Chinman

  • "It was just realizing ... that life isn't one big horror": a qualitative study of supported socialization.

    Larry Davidson;Karl E. Haglund;David A. Stayner;Jaak Rakfeldt

  • Leaving foster care—the influence of child and case characteristics on foster care exit rates

    Christian M. Connell;Karol H. Katz;Leon Saunders;Jacob Kraemer Tebes

  • Impact of a Positive Youth Development Program in Urban After-School Settings on the Prevention of Adolescent Substance Use

    Jacob Kraemer Tebes;Richard Feinn;Jeffrey J. Vanderploeg;Matthew J. Chinman

  • A comparison of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III—R and clinical diagnoses.

    Jeanne L. Steiner;Jacob Kraemer Tebes;William H. Sledge;Martha Loukides Walker

  • Community Science, Philosophy of Science, and the Practice of Research

    Jacob Kraemer Tebes

  • Suicidality and depression among african american adolescents: the role of family and peer support and community connectedness.

    Samantha L. Matlin;Sherry Davis Molock;Jacob Kraemer Tebes

  • The Nature of Elder Impairment and its Impact on Family Caregivers' Health and Psychosocial Functioning

    Lynn Cattanach;Jacob Kraemer Tebes

  • Changes in Placement among Children in Foster Care: A Longitudinal Study of Child and Case Influences.

    Christian M. Connell;Jeffrey J. Vanderploeg;Paul Flaspohler;Paul Flaspohler;Karol H. Katz

  • Day hospital/crisis respite care versus inpatient care, Part I: Clinical outcomes.

    William H. Sledge;Jacob Tebes;Jaak Rakfeldt;Larry Davidson

  • Maltreatment, family environment, and social risk factors: Determinants of the child welfare to juvenile justice transition among maltreated children and adolescents.

    Sarah Vidal;Dana Prince;Christian M. Connell;Colleen M. Caron

  • Day hospital/crisis respite care versus inpatient care, part II: Service utilization and costs

    William H. Sledge;Jacob Tebes;Nancy Wolff;Thomas W. Helminiak

  • The relationship between anxiety and substance use disorders among individuals with severe affective disorders

    Renee D. Goodwin;David A. Stayner;Matthew J. Chinman;Ping Wu

  • Maltreatment following reunification: predictors of subsequent Child Protective Services contact after children return home.

    Christian M. Connell;Jeffrey J. Vanderploeg;Karol H. Katz;Colleen Caron

  • Cognitive transformation as a marker of resilience.

    Jacob Kraemer Tebes;Julie T Irish;Mary Jo Puglisi Vasquez;David V Perkins

  • Resilience and Family Psychosocial Processes Among Children of Parents with Serious Mental Disorders

    Jacob Kraemer Tebes;Joy S. Kaufman;Jean Adnopoz;Gary Racusin

  • Systems Measures of a Trauma-Informed Approach: A Systematic Review

    Robey B. Champine;Robey B. Champine;Jason M. Lang;Jason M. Lang;Ashley M. Nelson;Rochelle F. Hanson

  • Peer Support Among Individuals with Severe Mental Illness

    Larry Davidson;Matthew Chinman;Bret Kloos;Richard Weingarten

  • It Was Just Realizing... That Life Isn't One Big Horror

    Larry Davidson;Karl E. Haglund;David A. Stayner;Jaak Rakfeldt

Frequent Co-Authors

Christian M. Connell
Christian M. Connell Pennsylvania State University
Larry Davidson
Larry Davidson Yale University
Matthew Chinman
Matthew Chinman RAND Corporation
Golan Shahar
Golan Shahar Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Michael W. Arthur
Michael W. Arthur University of Washington
Nancy Wolff
Nancy Wolff Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Rajita Sinha
Rajita Sinha Yale University
Sherry A. McKee
Sherry A. McKee Yale University
Linda C. Mayes
Linda C. Mayes Yale University
John H. Krystal
John H. Krystal Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens up a wide range of rewarding career pathways in the USA. Many students choose to specialize in Applied Behavior Analysis and work toward becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). This role is in high demand in fields such as education, mental health, and developmental disabilities.

BCBA certification requires specific education, supervised fieldwork, and passing the national exam. Each state and city may have different requirements for aspiring professionals. For example, you can learn about Chandler bcba education requirements as well as discover the steps on how to become a bcba in Charlotte. Those interested in Virginia can review Chesapeake bcba requirements, while future professionals in Illinois can check bcba certification requirements in Chicago.

With flexible online programs and a clear understanding of regional requirements, students can confidently prepare for a career as a BCBA or related psychology pathways across the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Jacob Kraemer Tebes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles