World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 80 1002 891 529 460 159 22454

Jacalyn H. Pierce publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jacalyn H. Pierce between 1963 and 2016, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jacalyn H. Pierce published across 54 years, from 1963 to 2016, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 1990. 1 of the 177 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1963 to 2016. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 1990. 1963: 1 publication 1964: 1 publication 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 2 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 7 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 10 publications 1989: 8 publications 1990: 20 publications 1991: 14 publications 1992: 13 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 16 publications 1995: 13 publications 1996: 14 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 13 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 1 publication 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 1 publication
1963 2016

177 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jacalyn H. Pierce: publications per year, 1963 to 2016
Year Publications
1963 1
1964 1
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 1
1983 2
1984 2
1985 5
1986 7
1987 7
1988 10
1989 8
1990 20
1991 14
1992 13
1993 7
1994 16
1995 13
1996 14
1997 10
1998 13
1999 6
2000 1
2001 1
2002 0
2003 1
2004 1
2005 0
2006 0
2007 0
2008 1
2009 1
2010 0
2011 0
2012 0
2013 0
2014 0
2015 0
2016 1
Total 177
Download as CSV

Jacalyn H. Pierce publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacalyn H. Pierce sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 157–166 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 159 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Jacalyn H. Pierce D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacalyn H. Pierce sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73 80
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Jacalyn H. Pierce is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their professional profile includes involvement in scientific research within a notable government biomedical research institution.

The available data does not list specific recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues associated with Jacalyn H. Pierce. There is no detailed information on their main fields of study, subfields, or primary research topics based on current data.

There are no recorded book publications linked to Jacalyn H. Pierce, nor are there any known awards or recognitions documented for this scientist. The absence of detailed publication and research topic data limits the overview of their scientific contributions.

Despite the limited specific data, the association with the National Institutes of Health suggests involvement in biomedical research or related scientific disciplines. NIH affiliation typically indicates participation in health sciences, clinical trials, or biomedical investigations, though precise fields cannot be confirmed here.

Best Publications

  • Mast cell lines produce lymphokines in response to cross-linkage of Fc epsilon RI or to calcium ionophores.

    Marshall Plaut;Jacalyn H. Pierce;Cynthia J. Watson;Joan Hanley-Hyde

  • erbB-2 is a potent oncogene when overexpressed in NIH/3T3 cells

    PP Di Fiore;JH Pierce;MH Kraus;O Segatto

  • Role of IRS-2 in insulin and cytokine signalling

    Xiao Jian Sun;Ling Mei Wang;Yitao Zhang;Lynne Yenush

  • Induction of WAF1/CIP1 by a p53-independent Pathway

    P Michieli;M Chedid;D Lin;J H Pierce

  • Overexpression of the human EGF receptor confers an EGF-dependent transformed phenotype to NIH 3T3 cells

    Pier Paolo Di Fiore;Jacalyn H. Pierce;Timothy P. Fleming;Rachel Hazan

  • Isolation of a novel receptor cDNA establishes the existence of two PDGF receptor genes.

    Toshimitsu Matsui;M Heidaran;T Miki;N Popescu

  • Overexpression of protein kinase C-delta and -epsilon in NIH 3T3 cells induces opposite effects on growth, morphology, anchorage dependence, and tumorigenicity.

    H Mischak;J A Goodnight;W Kolch;G Martiny-Baron

  • IRS-1: essential for insulin- and IL-4-stimulated mitogenesis in hematopoietic cells.

    Ling Mei Wang;Martin G. Myers;Xiao Jian Sun;Stuart A. Aaronson

  • B cell stimulatory factor-1/interleukin-4 mRNA is expressed by normal and transformed mast cells

    Melissa A. Brown;Jacalyn H. Pierce;Cynthia J. Watson;Joseph Falco

  • Cloning of murine Stat6 and human Stat6, Stat proteins that are tyrosine phosphorylated in responses to IL-4 and IL-3 but are not required for mitogenesis.

    F W Quelle;K Shimoda;W Thierfelder;C Fischer

  • Neoplastic transformation of mast cells by Abelson-MuLV: abrogation of IL-3 dependence by a nonautocrine mechanism.

    Jacalyn H Pierce;Pier Paolo Di Fiore;Stuart A. Aaronson;Michael Potter

  • Insulin receptor substrate (IRS) 1 is reduced and IRS-2 is the main docking protein for phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase in adipocytes from subjects with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

    Cristina M. Rondinone;Ling-Mei Wang;Peter Lonnroth;Christian Wesslau

  • Neuregulin-4: a novel growth factor that acts through the ErbB-4 receptor tyrosine kinase.

    D Harari;E Tzahar;J Romano;M Shelly

  • An IL-4 receptor region containing an insulin receptor motif is important for IL-4-mediated IRS-1 phosphorylation and cell growth

    Achsah D. Keegan;Keats Nelms;Morris White;Ling-Mei Wang

  • Cell-cell adhesion mediated by binding of membrane-anchored transforming growth factor alpha to epidermal growth factor receptors promotes cell proliferation.

    Pervin Anklesaria;Joaquin Teixido;Marikki Laiho;Jacalyn H. Pierce

  • Autocrine interaction between TGF alpha and the EGF-receptor: quantitative requirements for induction of the malignant phenotype.

    E. Di Marco;J. H. Pierce;T. P. Fleming;M. H. Kraus

  • Insulin receptor substrate-1 mediates phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase and p70S6k signaling during insulin, insulin-like growth factor-1, and interleukin-4 stimulation.

    M. G. Myers;T. C. Grammer;Ling-Mei Wang;Xiao Jian Sun

  • Phorbol ester-induced myeloid differentiation is mediated by protein kinase C-alpha and -delta and not by protein kinase C-beta II, -epsilon, -zeta, and -eta.

    H Mischak;J H Pierce;J Goodnight;M G Kazanietz

  • Signal Transduction through the EGF Receptor Transfected in IL-3--Dependent Hematopoietic Cells

    JH Pierce;M Ruggiero;TP Fleming;PP Di Fiore

  • Role of IRS-1-GRB-2 complexes in insulin signaling.

    Martin G. Myers;Ling Mai Wang;Xiao Jian Sun;Yitao Zhang

Frequent Co-Authors

Stuart A. Aaronson
Stuart A. Aaronson Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Joel S. Greenberger
Joel S. Greenberger University of Pittsburgh
Morris F. White
Morris F. White Boston Children's Hospital
Martin G. Myers
Martin G. Myers University of Toronto
Timothy P. Fleming
Timothy P. Fleming St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center
Roy A. Jensen
Roy A. Jensen University of Florida
William E. Paul
William E. Paul National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Achsah D. Keegan
Achsah D. Keegan University of Maryland, Baltimore
Herbert C. Morse
Herbert C. Morse National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Lynne Yenush
Lynne Yenush Universitat Politècnica de València

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online study in Molecular Biology opens the door to various degree options and career directions in science and STEM-related fields. Students interested in broadening their skill set beyond lab-based studies can take advantage of flexible, reputable online programs—many that align with interdisciplinary or specialized aspirations.

For instance, if your focus leans toward design in science communication or visualization, a graphic design online degree could enhance your ability to present complex biological research visually. Those passionate about quantitative research methods might consider a bachelor in mathematics online to strengthen their analytical skills and expand their career network.

If your interests are broader, exploring best value online interdisciplinary studies degrees can help you combine Molecular Biology with complementary subjects like public health, policy, or business. Alternatively, students fascinated by the structural side of biology might look to an architecture degree online for roles in bio-design or biomedical engineering.

These pathways illustrate the versatility of an online education, offering diverse opportunities that support anytime, anywhere learning and career advancement.

Best Scientists Citing Jacalyn H. Pierce

Recently Published Articles