World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
80
Citations
22454
World Ranking
1002
National Ranking
530

Jacalyn H. Pierce publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacalyn H. Pierce sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 159 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Jacalyn H. Pierce D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacalyn H. Pierce sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jacalyn H. Pierce is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their professional profile includes involvement in scientific research within a notable government biomedical research institution.

The available data does not list specific recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues associated with Jacalyn H. Pierce. There is no detailed information on their main fields of study, subfields, or primary research topics based on current data.

There are no recorded book publications linked to Jacalyn H. Pierce, nor are there any known awards or recognitions documented for this scientist. The absence of detailed publication and research topic data limits the overview of their scientific contributions.

Despite the limited specific data, the association with the National Institutes of Health suggests involvement in biomedical research or related scientific disciplines. NIH affiliation typically indicates participation in health sciences, clinical trials, or biomedical investigations, though precise fields cannot be confirmed here.

Best Publications

  • Mast cell lines produce lymphokines in response to cross-linkage of Fc epsilon RI or to calcium ionophores.

    Marshall Plaut;Jacalyn H. Pierce;Cynthia J. Watson;Joan Hanley-Hyde

  • erbB-2 is a potent oncogene when overexpressed in NIH/3T3 cells

    PP Di Fiore;JH Pierce;MH Kraus;O Segatto

  • Role of IRS-2 in insulin and cytokine signalling

    Xiao Jian Sun;Ling Mei Wang;Yitao Zhang;Lynne Yenush

  • Induction of WAF1/CIP1 by a p53-independent Pathway

    P Michieli;M Chedid;D Lin;J H Pierce

  • Overexpression of the human EGF receptor confers an EGF-dependent transformed phenotype to NIH 3T3 cells

    Pier Paolo Di Fiore;Jacalyn H. Pierce;Timothy P. Fleming;Rachel Hazan

  • Isolation of a novel receptor cDNA establishes the existence of two PDGF receptor genes.

    Toshimitsu Matsui;M Heidaran;T Miki;N Popescu

  • Overexpression of protein kinase C-delta and -epsilon in NIH 3T3 cells induces opposite effects on growth, morphology, anchorage dependence, and tumorigenicity.

    H Mischak;J A Goodnight;W Kolch;G Martiny-Baron

  • IRS-1: essential for insulin- and IL-4-stimulated mitogenesis in hematopoietic cells.

    Ling Mei Wang;Martin G. Myers;Xiao Jian Sun;Stuart A. Aaronson

  • B cell stimulatory factor-1/interleukin-4 mRNA is expressed by normal and transformed mast cells

    Melissa A. Brown;Jacalyn H. Pierce;Cynthia J. Watson;Joseph Falco

  • Cloning of murine Stat6 and human Stat6, Stat proteins that are tyrosine phosphorylated in responses to IL-4 and IL-3 but are not required for mitogenesis.

    F W Quelle;K Shimoda;W Thierfelder;C Fischer

  • Neoplastic transformation of mast cells by Abelson-MuLV: abrogation of IL-3 dependence by a nonautocrine mechanism.

    Jacalyn H Pierce;Pier Paolo Di Fiore;Stuart A. Aaronson;Michael Potter

  • Insulin receptor substrate (IRS) 1 is reduced and IRS-2 is the main docking protein for phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase in adipocytes from subjects with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

    Cristina M. Rondinone;Ling-Mei Wang;Peter Lonnroth;Christian Wesslau

  • Neuregulin-4: a novel growth factor that acts through the ErbB-4 receptor tyrosine kinase.

    D Harari;E Tzahar;J Romano;M Shelly

  • An IL-4 receptor region containing an insulin receptor motif is important for IL-4-mediated IRS-1 phosphorylation and cell growth

    Achsah D. Keegan;Keats Nelms;Morris White;Ling-Mei Wang

  • Cell-cell adhesion mediated by binding of membrane-anchored transforming growth factor alpha to epidermal growth factor receptors promotes cell proliferation.

    Pervin Anklesaria;Joaquin Teixido;Marikki Laiho;Jacalyn H. Pierce

  • Autocrine interaction between TGF alpha and the EGF-receptor: quantitative requirements for induction of the malignant phenotype.

    E. Di Marco;J. H. Pierce;T. P. Fleming;M. H. Kraus

  • Insulin receptor substrate-1 mediates phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase and p70S6k signaling during insulin, insulin-like growth factor-1, and interleukin-4 stimulation.

    M. G. Myers;T. C. Grammer;Ling-Mei Wang;Xiao Jian Sun

  • Phorbol ester-induced myeloid differentiation is mediated by protein kinase C-alpha and -delta and not by protein kinase C-beta II, -epsilon, -zeta, and -eta.

    H Mischak;J H Pierce;J Goodnight;M G Kazanietz

  • Signal Transduction through the EGF Receptor Transfected in IL-3--Dependent Hematopoietic Cells

    JH Pierce;M Ruggiero;TP Fleming;PP Di Fiore

  • Role of IRS-1-GRB-2 complexes in insulin signaling.

    Martin G. Myers;Ling Mai Wang;Xiao Jian Sun;Yitao Zhang

Frequent Co-Authors

Stuart A. Aaronson
Stuart A. Aaronson Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Joel S. Greenberger
Joel S. Greenberger University of Pittsburgh
Morris F. White
Morris F. White Boston Children's Hospital
Martin G. Myers
Martin G. Myers University of Toronto
Timothy P. Fleming
Timothy P. Fleming St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center
Roy A. Jensen
Roy A. Jensen University of Florida
William E. Paul
William E. Paul National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Achsah D. Keegan
Achsah D. Keegan University of Maryland, Baltimore
Herbert C. Morse
Herbert C. Morse National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Lynne Yenush
Lynne Yenush Universitat Politècnica de València

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online study in Molecular Biology opens the door to various degree options and career directions in science and STEM-related fields. Students interested in broadening their skill set beyond lab-based studies can take advantage of flexible, reputable online programs—many that align with interdisciplinary or specialized aspirations.

For instance, if your focus leans toward design in science communication or visualization, a graphic design online degree could enhance your ability to present complex biological research visually. Those passionate about quantitative research methods might consider a bachelor in mathematics online to strengthen their analytical skills and expand their career network.

If your interests are broader, exploring best value online interdisciplinary studies degrees can help you combine Molecular Biology with complementary subjects like public health, policy, or business. Alternatively, students fascinated by the structural side of biology might look to an architecture degree online for roles in bio-design or biomedical engineering.

These pathways illustrate the versatility of an online education, offering diverse opportunities that support anytime, anywhere learning and career advancement.

Best Scientists Citing Jacalyn H. Pierce

Recently Published Articles