World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
31
Citations
5911
World Ranking
13435
National Ranking
5373

Ivan Seskar publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ivan Seskar sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 242 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ivan Seskar D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ivan Seskar sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ivan Seskar is affiliated with Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in the United States. Their research spans the fields of engineering and computer science, with a focus on electrical and electronic engineering, computer networks and communications, aerospace engineering, industrial and manufacturing engineering, and hardware and architecture.

The primary topics addressed in their work include:

  • Advanced MIMO Systems Optimization
  • Advanced Wireless Communication Techniques
  • Software-Defined Networks and 5G
  • Wireless Communication Networks Research
  • IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
  • Full-Duplex Wireless Communications

Seskar's publication record includes papers on programmable testbeds, container migration frameworks, smart city infrastructure, and wireless communication systems. Some recent examples are:

  • "A Software-Defined Programmable Testbed for Beyond 5G Optical-Wireless Experimentation at City-Scale," 2022, IEEE Network
  • "ShareOn: Shared Resource Dynamic Container Migration Framework for Real-Time Support in Mobile Edge Clouds," 2022, IEEE Access
  • "Smart City Intersections: Intelligence Nodes for Future Metropolises," 2022, Computer
  • "Open-access millimeter-wave software-defined radios in the PAWR COSMOS testbed: Design, deployment, and experimentation," 2023, Computer Networks
  • "An AI-Based Incumbent Protection System for Collaborative Intelligent Radio Networks," 2020, IEEE Wireless Communications

Frequent co-authors include Gil Zussman, Prasanthi Maddala, Dipankar Raychaudhuri, Bhargav Gokalgandhi, and Tingjun Chen. This reflects collaborative efforts across multiple papers and projects.

Seskar publishes regularly in a variety of venues, notably:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Computer Networks
  • Manufacturing Letters
  • Computer
  • IEEE Wireless Communications

Best Publications

  • Overview of the ORBIT radio grid testbed for evaluation of next-generation wireless network protocols

    D. Raychaudhuri;I. Seskar;M. Ott;S. Ganu

  • GENI: A federated testbed for innovative network experiments

    Mark Berman;Jeffrey S. Chase;Lawrence Landweber;Akihiro Nakao

  • Security and privacy vulnerabilities of in-car wireless networks: a tire pressure monitoring system case study

    Ishtiaq Rouf;Rob Miller;Hossen Mustafa;Travis Taylor

  • OMF: a control and management framework for networking testbeds

    Thierry Rakotoarivelo;Maximilian Ott;Guillaume Jourjon;Ivan Seskar

  • Coordinated dynamic spectrum management of LTE-U and Wi-Fi networks

    Shweta Sagari;Samuel Baysting;Dola Saha;Ivan Seskar

  • MobilityFirst future internet architecture project

    Ivan Seskar;Kiran Nagaraja;Sam Nelson;Dipankar Raychaudhuri

  • Rate of location area updates in cellular systems

    I. Seskar;S.V. Maric;J. Holtzman;J. Wasserman

  • Challenge: COSMOS: A city-scale programmable testbed for experimentation with advanced wireless

    Dipankar Raychaudhuri;Ivan Seskar;Gil Zussman;Thanasis Korakis

  • Effect of Antenna Placement and Diversity on Vehicular Network Communications

    S. Kaul;K. Ramachandran;P. Shankar;S. Oh

  • ORBIT testbed software architecture: supporting experiments as a service

    M. Ott;I. Seskar;R. Siraccusa;M. Singh

  • SplitAP: Leveraging Wireless Network Virtualization for Flexible Sharing of WLANs

    Gautam Bhanage;Dipti Vete;Ivan Seskar;Dipankar Raychaudhuri

  • Scalability and Performance Evaluation of Edge Cloud Systems for Latency Constrained Applications

    Sumit Maheshwari;Dipankar Raychaudhuri;Ivan Seskar;Francesco Bronzino

  • Virtual basestation: architecture for an open shared WiMAX framework

    Gautam Bhanage;Ivan Seskar;Rajesh Mahindra;Dipankar Raychaudhuri

  • Method and apparatus for using wireless hotspots and semantic routing to provide broadband mobile services

    Maximilian A. Ott;Ivan Seskar;Manpreet Singh

  • ORBIT radio grid testbed for evaluation of next-generation wireless network protocols

    D. Raychaudhuri;M. Ott;I. Secker

  • ORBIT Measurements framework and library (OML): motivations, implementation and features

    M. Singh;M. Ott;I. Seskar;P. Kamat

  • Modeling the coexistence of LTE and WiFi heterogeneous networks in dense deployment scenarios

    Shweta Sagari;Ivan Seskar;Dipankar Raychaudhuri

  • A software radio architecture for linear multiuser detection

    I.P. Seskar;N.B. Mandayam

  • Routing protocols for self-organizing hierarchical ad-hoc wireless networks

    Suli Zhao;Kemal Tepe;Ivan Seskar;Dipankar Raychaudhuri

  • Methods for restoring MAC layer fairness in IEEE 802.11 networks with physical layer capture

    Sachin Ganu;Kishore Ramachandran;Marco Gruteser;Ivan Seskar

  • Practical implementation of successive interference cancellation in DS/CDMA systems

    K.I. Pedersen;T.E. Kolding;I. Seskar;J.M. Holtzman

  • Estimating the Doppler spectrum of a short-range fixed wireless channel

    A. Domazetovic;L.J. Greenstein;N.B. Mandayam;I. Seskar

  • Implementation aspects for successive interference cancellation in DS/CDMA systems

    Ivan Seskar;Troels E. Kolding;Jack M. Holtzman

  • Effect ofAntenna Placement and Diversity on VehicularNetworkCommunications

    S. Kaul;K. Ramachandran;P. Shankart;S. Oh

Frequent Co-Authors

Dipankar Raychaudhuri
Dipankar Raychaudhuri Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Narayan B. Mandayam
Narayan B. Mandayam Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Gil Zussman
Gil Zussman Columbia University
Marco Gruteser
Marco Gruteser Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Sastry Kompella
Sastry Kompella United States Naval Research Laboratory
Larry J. Greenstein
Larry J. Greenstein Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Ingrid Moerman
Ingrid Moerman Ghent University
Harish Krishnaswamy
Harish Krishnaswamy Columbia University
Wade Trappe
Wade Trappe Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Yanyong Zhang
Yanyong Zhang University of Science and Technology of China

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens the door to a range of related online degrees and certifications that boost your skills and career options. Today, you can earn your degree from home with flexibility and affordability in mind.

For those interested in physics, consider a bachelor of science in physics online. This degree combines theoretical knowledge with problem-solving skills highly valued in tech roles. If you want to specialize in big data, a cheapest master in data science program can give you an edge in data analytics, AI, or machine learning careers.

Interested in hardware or applied technology? Accredited online electrical engineering programs make it easier to broaden your engineering expertise without relocating. Additionally, if you’re seeking to quickly enhance your credentials or earning potential, explore easy certifications to get for high-demand fields.

Whether you choose a full degree or a targeted certification, these pathways help you stay adaptable and competitive in the fast-evolving tech job market.

Best Scientists Citing Ivan Seskar

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles