World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
88
Citations
31835
World Ranking
13051
National Ranking
388

Itaru Endo publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Itaru Endo sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 956 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Itaru Endo D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Itaru Endo sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Itaru Endo is affiliated with Yokohama City University in Japan and has a significant publication record primarily in the field of medicine, with an emphasis on oncology, surgery, and hepatology. Their research spans over 1,100 publications focusing on diverse subfields including oncology (340 publications), surgery (295 publications), pulmonary and respiratory medicine (209 publications), cancer research (104 publications), and hepatology (99 publications).

The main topics of their research work include:

  • Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
  • Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
  • Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
  • Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
  • Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment

Itaru Endo has contributed to several recent papers notable for their publication venues and citation counts:

  • "Liver metastases," 2021, published in Nature Reviews Disease Primers
  • "Very Early Recurrence After Liver Resection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma," 2020, JAMA Surgery
  • "Clinical practice guidelines for the management of biliary tract cancers 2019: The 3rd English edition," 2020, Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences
  • "M1 Macrophage and M1/M2 ratio defined by transcriptomic signatures resemble only part of their conventional clinical characteristics in breast cancer," 2020, Scientific Reports
  • "CD8 T Cell Score as a Prognostic Biomarker for Triple Negative Breast Cancer," 2020, International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • George A. Poultsides
  • Ryusei Matsuyama
  • Timothy M. Pawlik
  • Hugo P. Marques
  • Luca Aldrighetti

The scientists frequently publish in the following venues:

  • Annals of Surgical Oncology
  • Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences
  • HPB
  • Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery
  • Cancers

Best Publications

  • Tokyo Guidelines 2018: diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos).

    Masamichi Yokoe;Jiro Hata;Tadahiro Takada;Steven M. Strasberg

  • Tokyo Guidelines 2018: flowchart for the management of acute cholecystitis.

    Kohji Okamoto;Kenji Suzuki;Tadahiro Takada;Steven M. Strasberg

  • Biomarkers for the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.

    Nobuhiro Tsuchiya;Yu Sawada;Itaru Endo;Keigo Saito

  • Tokyo Guidelines 2018 surgical management of acute cholecystitis: safe steps in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (with videos)

    Go Wakabayashi;Yukio Iwashita;Taizo Hibi;Tadahiro Takada

  • Tokyo Guidelines 2018: antimicrobial therapy for acute cholangitis and cholecystitis.

    Harumi Gomi;Joseph S. Solomkin;David Schlossberg;Kohji Okamoto

  • The Tumor Burden Score: A New "Metro-ticket" Prognostic Tool For Colorectal Liver Metastases Based on Tumor Size and Number of Tumors.

    Kazunari Sasaki;Daisuke Morioka;Simone Conci;Georgios A. Margonis

  • Tokyo Guidelines 2018: initial management of acute biliary infection and flowchart for acute cholangitis

    Fumihiko Miura;Kohji Okamoto;Tadahiro Takada;Steven M. Strasberg

  • Clinical practice guidelines for the management of biliary tract cancers 2015: the 2nd English edition

    Masaru Miyazaki;Hideyuki Yoshitomi;Shuichi Miyakawa;Katsuhiko Uesaka

  • Outcome after simultaneous colorectal and hepatic resection for colorectal cancer with synchronous metastases

    Kuniya Tanaka;Hiroshi Shimada;Kenichi Matsuo;Yasuhiko Nagano

  • Tokyo Guidelines 2018: management strategies for gallbladder drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis (with videos).

    Yasuhisa Mori;Takao Itoi;Todd H. Baron;Tadahiro Takada

  • Risk Factors and Management of Bile Leakage after Hepatic Resection

    Yasuhiko Nagano;Shinji Togo;Kuniya Tanaka;Hidenori Masui

  • Tokyo Guidelines 2018 management bundles for acute cholangitis and cholecystitis

    Toshihiko Mayumi;Kohji Okamoto;Tadahiro Takada;Steven M. Strasberg

  • The Blumgart Preoperative Staging System for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Analysis of Resectability and Outcomes in 380 Patients

    Kenichi Matsuo;Flavio G. Rocha;Kaori Ito;Michael I. D'Angelica

  • A nomogram predicting disease-free survival in patients with colorectal liver metastases treated with hepatic resection: multicenter data collection as a Project Study for Hepatic Surgery of the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery

    Toru Beppu;Yoshihiro Sakamoto;Kiyoshi Hasegawa;Goro Honda

  • Surgical outcomes in gastroenterological surgery in Japan: Report of National Clinical database 2011-2016.

    Hiroshi Hasegawa;Arata Takahashi;Yoshihiro Kakeji;Hideki Ueno

  • Classification of biliary tract cancers established by the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery: 3(rd) English edition.

    Masaru Miyazaki;Masayuki Ohtsuka;Shuichi Miyakawa;Masato Nagino

  • Exosomal miRNAs from Peritoneum Lavage Fluid as Potential Prognostic Biomarkers of Peritoneal Metastasis in Gastric Cancer.

    Motohiko Tokuhisa;Yasushi Ichikawa;Nobuyoshi Kosaka;Takahiro Ochiya

  • Phase II study of the GPC3-derived peptide vaccine as an adjuvant therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma patients

    Yu Sawada;Toshiaki Yoshikawa;Kazuya Ofuji;Mayuko Yoshimura

  • Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging to reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched cohort study

    Jun Watanabe;Atsushi Ishibe;Yusuke Suwa;Hirokazu Suwa

  • Efficacy of tumor-targeting Salmonella typhimurium A1-R in combination with anti-angiogenesis therapy on a pancreatic cancer patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) and cell line mouse models

    Yukihiko Hiroshima;Yong Zhang;Takashi Murakami;Ali Maawy

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert M. Hoffman
Robert M. Hoffman AntiCancer (United States)
Michael Bouvet
Michael Bouvet University of California, San Diego
Kazuaki Takabe
Kazuaki Takabe Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Timothy M. Pawlik
Timothy M. Pawlik The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Luca Aldrighetti
Luca Aldrighetti Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Masakazu Yamamoto
Masakazu Yamamoto Tohoku University
Li Yan
Li Yan Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center
Olivier Soubrane
Olivier Soubrane Beaujon Hospital
Ming Zhao
Ming Zhao Pfizer (United States)
Atsushi Nakajima
Atsushi Nakajima Yokohama City University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring additional qualifications in healthcare can expand your career options. Aside from studying Medicine, several online degrees offer flexible learning and advanced career progression, especially in nursing.

Many students start by researching affordable online nursing programs, which provide a cost-effective way to earn vital credentials and begin a healthcare career. For registered nurses seeking advancement, affordable rn to bsn programs make it easier to upgrade qualifications and access leadership roles.

For those aspiring to the highest levels of nursing practice, pursuing doctoral studies is increasingly popular. Many professionals look for the cheapest online dnp programs to gain advanced skills while managing costs and balancing work commitments.

Increasingly, people from non-nursing backgrounds are entering the field through specialized programs. Online msn programs for non nurses facilitate this transition, enabling rapid entry into advanced nursing roles.

These online degree pathways offer flexibility, accessibility, and affordability, making them attractive alternatives or complements to traditional medical education in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Itaru Endo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles