World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Israel Orbach

Israel Orbach

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
34
Citations
5286
World Ranking
10179
National Ranking
121

Israel Orbach publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Israel Orbach sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 92 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Israel Orbach D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Israel Orbach sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Israel Orbach was affiliated with Bar-Ilan University in Israel during their academic career. They were recognized as a scholar in their field but no detailed records of recent papers, publication venues, or co-authors are available for review.

There is no specific information regarding their primary fields of study, subfields, or main research topics. Similarly, data about their book publications is not present.

Information about awards or distinctions received by Israel Orbach has not been documented in the available data.

The academic contributions of Israel Orbach remain largely undocumented in sources that typically track publications and research topics, which limits a detailed analysis of their scientific work or areas of focus.

Best Publications

  • Attachment styles and repressive defensiveness: the accessibility and architecture of affective memories.

    Mario Mikulincer;Israel Orbach

  • Mental Pain: A Multidimensional Operationalization and Definition

    Israel Orbach;Mario Mikulincer;Pinhas Sirota;Eva Gilboa-Schechtman

  • Mental pain and its relationship to suicidality and life meaning

    Israel Orbach;Mario Mikulincer;Eva Gilboa-Schechtman;Pinhas Sirota

  • Adult attachment style and affect regulation: Strategic variations in subjective self–other similarity.

    Mario Mikulincer;Israel Orbach;Daria Iavnieli

  • The Body Investment Scale: Construction and validation of a body experience scale.

    Israel Orbach;Mario Mikulincer

  • Thresholds and tolerance of physical pain in suicidal and nonsuicidal adolescents.

    Israel Orbach;Mario Mikulincer;Robert King;Donald Cohen

  • A multi-attitude suicide tendency scale for adolescents

    Israel Orbach;Ilana Milstein;Dov Har-Even;Alan Apter

  • Discovering the truth in attempted suicide.

    Konrad Michel;John T. Maltsberger;David A. Jobes;Antoon A. Leenaars

  • Autobiographical memory, interpersonal problem solving, and suicidal behavior in adolescent inpatients.

    Miri Arie;Alan Apter;Israel Orbach;Yael Yefet

  • Dissociation, physical pain, and suicide: a hypothesis

    Israel Orbach

  • The role of the body experience in self-destruction.

    Israel Orbach

  • Body attitudes and body experiences in suicidal adolescents.

    Israel Orbach;Daniel Stein;Mirit Shani‐Sela;Dov Har‐Even

  • Perception of physical pain in accident and suicide attempt patients: Self-preservation vs self-destruction

    Israel Orbach;Daniel Stein;Yair Palgi;Jack Asherov

  • Styles of problem solving in suicidal individuals

    Israel Orbach;Hanna Bar‐Joseph;Nirit Dror

  • The Impact of a Suicide Prevention Program for Adolescents on Suicidal Tendencies, Hopelessness, Ego Identity, and Coping.

    Israel Orbach;Hanna Bar-Joseph

  • Comparison of the suicidal behavior of adolescent inpatients with borderline personality disorder and major depression

    Netta Horesh;Israel Orbach;Doron Gothelf;Meir Efrati

  • Tolerance for physical pain in suicidal subjects

    Israel Orbach;Yair Palgi;Daniel Stein;Dov Har-even

  • A Taxonomy of Factors Related to Suicidal Behavior

    Israel Orbach

  • Eating-related concerns, mood, and personality traits in recovered bulimia nervosa subjects: a replication study.

    D. Stein;D. Stein;W. H. Kaye;H. Matsunaga;H. Matsunaga;I. Orbach

  • Therapeutic empathy with the suicidal wish: principles of therapy with suicidal individuals

    Israel Orbach

  • Mental pain and suicide.

    Israel Orbach

Frequent Co-Authors

Mario Mikulincer
Mario Mikulincer Reichman University
Alan Apter
Alan Apter Reichman University
Gil Zalsman
Gil Zalsman Tel Aviv University
Dan J. Stein
Dan J. Stein University of Cape Town
Eva Gilboa-Schechtman
Eva Gilboa-Schechtman Bar-Ilan University
Gabrielle A. Carlson
Gabrielle A. Carlson Stony Brook University
Guido K.W. Frank
Guido K.W. Frank University of California, San Diego
Joan Rosenbaum Asarnow
Joan Rosenbaum Asarnow University of California, Los Angeles
Walter H. Kaye
Walter H. Kaye University of California, San Diego
Donald J. Cohen
Donald J. Cohen Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online psychology degree in the USA opens doors to diverse career options, such as clinical work, counseling, or specialized roles, including marriage and family therapy (MFT). Many aspiring therapists choose to become MFTs, a path that involves state-specific education and licensing requirements.

For individuals interested in practicing in California, it’s crucial to understand the mft requirements in San Jose and the Santa Ana mft certification requirements. These standards typically involve earning a graduate degree, completing supervised clinical hours, and passing state-accepted licensing exams.

Requirements can differ widely outside California. For example, those considering Arizona should review the Scottsdale mft education requirements. Meanwhile, in Washington state, you’ll need to learn about the Seattle mft education requirements.

Choosing an accredited online degree and understanding your state’s MFT pathway will help set you up for a successful and impactful counseling career.

Best Scientists Citing Israel Orbach

Recently Published Articles