World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
56
Citations
10928
World Ranking
3657
National Ranking
5

Ismail Koyuncu publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ismail Koyuncu sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 324 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Ismail Koyuncu D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ismail Koyuncu sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Advanced physico-chemical treatment experiences on young municipal landfill leachates.

    Unknown

  • Cellulose acetate in fabrication of polymeric membranes: A review.

    Unknown

  • Removal of hormones and antibiotics by nanofiltration membranes

    Ismail Koyuncu;Osman A. Arikan;Osman A. Arikan;Mark R. Wiesner;Clifford Rice

  • Desalination of produced water from oil production fields by membrane processes

    Unknown

  • Reactive dye removal in dye/salt mixtures by nanofiltration membranes containing vinylsulphone dyes: effects of feed concentration and cross flow velocity

    Unknown

  • The production of polysulfone (PS) membrane with silver nanoparticles (AgNP): Physical properties, filtration performances, and biofouling resistances of membranes

    Unknown

  • Zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF-8) modified cellulose acetate NF membranes for potential water treatment application.

    Unknown

  • Removal of trihalomethanes from drinking water by nanofiltration membranes.

    Unknown

  • Pilot-scale evaluation of nanofiltration and reverse osmosis for process reuse of segregated textile dyewash wastewater

    Eren Kurt;Derya Yuksel Koseoglu-Imer;Derya Yuksel Koseoglu-Imer;Nadir Dizge;Nadir Dizge;Shankar Chellam

  • Polyvinyl alcohol-based separation membranes: a comprehensive review on fabrication techniques, applications and future prospective

    Unknown

  • Polysaccharides in fabrication of membranes: A review.

    Unknown

  • Factors influencing flux decline during nanofiltration of solutions containing dyes and salts.

    Ismail Koyuncu;Dincer Topacik;Mark R. Wiesner

  • Investigation of boron nitride/silver/graphene oxide nanocomposite on separation and antibacterial improvement of polyethersulfone membranes in wastewater treatment

    Unknown

  • Pilot and full-scale applications of membrane processes for textile wastewater treatment: A critical review

    Unknown

  • Effects of operating conditions on the salt rejection of nanofiltration membranes in reactive dye/salt mixtures

    Unknown

  • Reuse of reactive dyehouse wastewater by nanofiltration: process water quality and economical implications

    Unknown

  • Removal of ammonia by natural clay minerals using fixed and fluidised bed column reactors

    M.S. Çelik;B. Özdemir;M. Turan;I. Koyuncu

  • Hyperbranched polyethylenimine functionalized silica/polysulfone nanocomposite membranes for water purification.

    Unknown

  • Application of low pressure nanofiltration membranes for the recovery and reuse of dairy industry effluents

    Unknown

  • Effect of silver nanoparticle (AgNP) location in nanocomposite membrane matrix fabricated with different polymer type on antibacterial mechanism

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark R. Wiesner
Mark R. Wiesner Duke University
Karthikeyan Rajagopal
Karthikeyan Rajagopal Chennai Institute of Technology
Vahid Vatanpour
Vahid Vatanpour Kharazmi University
Claudiu T. Supuran
Claudiu T. Supuran University of Florence
Akif Akgul
Akif Akgul Hittite University
Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan
Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan Vel Tech University
Mohammad Reza Ganjali
Mohammad Reza Ganjali University of Tehran
Mehmet Kitis
Mehmet Kitis Süleyman Demirel University
Mehmet S. Çelik
Mehmet S. Çelik Istanbul Technical University
Kwang-Ho Choo
Kwang-Ho Choo Kyungpook National University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their knowledge beyond Environmental Sciences, various online degree options offer flexible and affordable pathways. Students looking for graduate-level advancement might explore fully funded dsw programs, which can provide valuable skills for environmental policy and community advocacy roles.

Undergraduates seeking affordable education options can consider a low cost online general studies degree. This degree offers broad interdisciplinary knowledge, equipping students for diverse roles including environmental consulting and sustainability management.

Additionally, if balancing studies with other commitments is a priority, some may benefit from exploring what’s categorized as an easy bachelor's degree. While the term is subjective, these programs often provide flexible coursework that can complement Environmental Sciences studies.

For those specifically interested in the scientific study of earth processes, pursuing an online geoscience degree is a natural extension. This degree emphasizes practical skills in geology and earth systems, which are highly relevant to environmental research and management careers.

Best Scientists Citing Ismail Koyuncu

Recently Published Articles