World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ilja Tom Prášil

Ilja Tom Prášil

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
33
Citations
5097
World Ranking
5607
National Ranking
39

Ilja Tom Prášil publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ilja Tom Prášil sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 82 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Ilja Tom Prášil D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ilja Tom Prášil sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Plant proteome changes under abiotic stress--contribution of proteomics studies to understanding plant stress response

    Klára Kosová;Pavel Vítámvás;Ilja Tom Prášil;Jenny Renaut

  • Plant Abiotic Stress Proteomics: The Major Factors Determining Alterations in Cellular Proteome.

    Klára Kosová;Pavel Vítámvás;Milan O Urban;Ilja T Prášil

  • Complex phytohormone responses during the cold acclimation of two wheat cultivars differing in cold tolerance, winter Samanta and spring Sandra.

    Klára Kosová;Ilja Tom Prášil;Pavel Vítámvás;Petre Dobrev

  • Comparison of hormonal responses to heat, drought and combined stress in tobacco plants with elevated proline content.

    Jana Dobra;Vaclav Motyka;Petre Dobrev;Jiri Malbeck

  • The role of dehydrins in plant response to cold

    K. Kosová;P. Vítámvás;I. T. Prášil

  • Enhanced drought and heat stress tolerance of tobacco plants with ectopically enhanced cytokinin oxidase/dehydrogenase gene expression

    Hana Macková;Marie Hronková;Jana Dobrá;Veronika Turečková

  • Protein Contribution to Plant Salinity Response and Tolerance Acquisition

    Klára Kosová;Ilja T. Prášil;Pavel Vítámvás

  • Biological Networks Underlying Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Temperate Crops—A Proteomic Perspective

    Klára Kosová;Pavel Vítámvás;Milan Oldřich Urban;Miroslav Klíma

  • Proteome Analysis of Cold Response in Spring and Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Crowns Reveals Similarities in Stress Adaptation and Differences in Regulatory Processes between the Growth Habits

    Klára Kosová;Pavel Vítámvás;Sébastien Planchon;Jenny Renaut

  • Effect of heat stress on polyamine metabolism in proline-over-producing tobacco plants

    Milena Cvikrová;Lenka Gemperlová;Jana Dobrá;Olga Martincová

  • The use of a conductivity measurement method for assessing freezing injury: I. Influence of leakage time, segment number, size and shape in a sample on evaluation of the degree of injury

    Ilja Prášil;Jiřı́ Zámečnı́k

  • Analysis of proteome and frost tolerance in chromosome 5A and 5B reciprocal substitution lines between two winter wheats during long-term cold acclimation.

    Pavel Vítámvás;Ilja T. Prášil;Klára Kosová;Sébastien Planchon

  • Relationships among Vernalization, Shoot Apex Development and Frost Tolerance in Wheat

    Ilja Tom Prášil;Pavla Prášilová;Kateřina Pánková

  • The relationship between vernalization-and photoperiodically-regulated genes and the development of frost tolerance in wheat and barley

    K. Kosová;I. T. Prášil;P. Vítámvás

  • Expression of dehydrin 5 during the development of frost tolerance in barley (Hordeum vulgare)

    Klára Kosová;Ludmila Holková;Ilja Tom Prášil;Pavla Prášilová

  • Plant proteome responses to salinity stress – comparison of glycophytes and halophytes

    Unknown

  • Comparative study of direct and indirect evaluations of frost tolerance in barley

    I.T. Prášil;P. Prášilová;P. Mařík

  • Quantitative analysis of proteome extracted from barley crowns grown under different drought conditions.

    Pavel Vítámvás;Milan Oldřich Urban;Zbyněk Škodáček;Klára Kosová

  • Light Quality and Intensity Modulate Cold Acclimation in Arabidopsis

    Sylva Prerostova;Petre I Dobrev;Vojtech Knirsch;Jana Jarosova

  • The choice of reference gene set for assessing gene expression in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) under low temperature and drought stress.

    Anna Janská;Jan Hodek;Pavel Svoboda;Jiří Zámečník

Frequent Co-Authors

Radomira Vankova
Radomira Vankova Czech Academy of Sciences
Gábor Galiba
Gábor Galiba Centre for Agricultural Research
Jenny Renaut
Jenny Renaut Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology
Petre I. Dobrev
Petre I. Dobrev Czech Academy of Sciences
Václav Motyka
Václav Motyka Czech Academy of Sciences
Tibor Janda
Tibor Janda Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Ondřej Novák
Ondřej Novák Czech Academy of Sciences
Urs Feller
Urs Feller University of Bern
Hans Lambers
Hans Lambers University of Western Australia
John W. Snape
John W. Snape Norwich Research Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Ilja Tom Prášil

Recently Published Articles