Ilja Tom Prášil publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ilja Tom Prášil between 1975 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ilja Tom Prášil published across 52 years, from 1975 to 2026, averaging 1.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2021. 3 of the 86 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications

2 4 6 8

1975 2026

86 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table

Ilja Tom Prášil: publications per year, 1975 to 2026
Year	Publications
1975	1
1976	0
1977	0
1978	0
1979	0
1980	0
1981	0
1982	0
1983	0
1984	0
1985	0
1986	0
1987	0
1988	0
1989	1
1990	3
1991	0
1992	0
1993	0
1994	1
1995	0
1996	0
1997	0
1998	2
1999	2
2000	5
2001	0
2002	2
2003	0
2004	1
2005	1
2006	1
2007	3
2008	4
2009	1
2010	4
2011	6
2012	4
2013	7
2014	2
2015	3
2016	5
2017	2
2018	6
2019	5
2020	0
2021	8
2022	1
2023	1
2024	1
2025	2
2026	1
Total	86

Download as CSV

Ilja Tom Prášil publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ilja Tom Prášil sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists

50 100 150 200 250

36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 82 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table

Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications	Scientists	This scientist
36–40	2
41–45	7
46–50	40
51–55	58
56–60	60
61–65	107
66–70	130
71–75	153
76–80	191
81–85	199	82
86–90	206
91–95	218
96–100	226
101–105	227
106–110	247
111–115	255
116–120	253
121–125	233
126–130	219
131–135	201
136–140	194
141–145	176
146–150	157
151–155	147
156–160	151
161–165	159
166–170	137
171–175	128
176–180	126
181–185	98
186–190	114
191–195	100
196–200	90
201–205	71
206–210	98
211–215	70
216–220	86
221–225	61
226–230	58
231–235	53
236–240	64
241–245	39
246–250	46
251–255	51
256–260	36
261–265	44
266–270	35
271–275	30
276–280	33
281–285	35
286–290	36
291–295	26
296–300	26
301–305	31
306–310	30
311–315	21
316–320	29
321–325	14
326–330	15
331–335	15
336–340	17
341–345	15
346–350	12
351–355	17
356–360	18
361–365	12
366–370	11
371–375	6
376–380	6
381–385	11
386–390	9
391–395	10
396–400	8
401–405	4
406–410	9
411–415	11
416–420	4
421–425	7
426–430	4
431–435	3
436–440	5
441–445	8
446–450	6
451–455	7
456–460	5
461–465	6
466	2
467+	99

Download as CSV

Ilja Tom Prášil D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ilja Tom Prášil sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists

50 100 150 200 250

30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table

Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index	Scientists	This scientist
30	200
31	236
32	253
33	283	33
34	288
35	240
36	246
37	243
38	247
39	229
40	232
41	230
42	228
43	219
44	193
45	164
46	158
47	143
48	131
49	127
50	122
51	122
52	110
53	102
54	98
55	79
56	85
57	88
58	91
59	62
60	61
61	59
62	54
63	61
64	59
65	58
66	41
67	49
68	39
69	32
70	40
71	47
72	38
73	28
74	29
75	28
76	22
77	21
78	25
79	26
80	19
81	16
82	12
83	16
84	14
85	11
86	17
87	13
88	10
89	12
90	18
91	16
92	16
93	17
94	12
95	8
96	9
97	9
98	11
99	12
100	5
101	8
102	4
103	11
104	5
105	9
106	7
107	4
108	8
109+	99

Download as CSV

Best Publications

Plant proteome changes under abiotic stress--contribution of proteomics studies to understanding plant stress response

Klára Kosová;Pavel Vítámvás;Ilja Tom Prášil;Jenny Renaut

968
Citations
Plant Abiotic Stress Proteomics: The Major Factors Determining Alterations in Cellular Proteome.

Klára Kosová;Pavel Vítámvás;Milan O Urban;Ilja T Prášil

374
Citations
Complex phytohormone responses during the cold acclimation of two wheat cultivars differing in cold tolerance, winter Samanta and spring Sandra.

Klára Kosová;Ilja Tom Prášil;Pavel Vítámvás;Petre Dobrev

302
Citations
Comparison of hormonal responses to heat, drought and combined stress in tobacco plants with elevated proline content.

Jana Dobra;Vaclav Motyka;Petre Dobrev;Jiri Malbeck

281
Citations
The role of dehydrins in plant response to cold

K. Kosová;P. Vítámvás;I. T. Prášil

281
Citations
Enhanced drought and heat stress tolerance of tobacco plants with ectopically enhanced cytokinin oxidase/dehydrogenase gene expression

Hana Macková;Marie Hronková;Jana Dobrá;Veronika Turečková

250
Citations
Protein Contribution to Plant Salinity Response and Tolerance Acquisition

Klára Kosová;Ilja T. Prášil;Pavel Vítámvás

235
Citations
Biological Networks Underlying Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Temperate Crops—A Proteomic Perspective

Klára Kosová;Pavel Vítámvás;Milan Oldřich Urban;Miroslav Klíma

162
Citations
Proteome Analysis of Cold Response in Spring and Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Crowns Reveals Similarities in Stress Adaptation and Differences in Regulatory Processes between the Growth Habits

Klára Kosová;Pavel Vítámvás;Sébastien Planchon;Jenny Renaut

153
Citations
Effect of heat stress on polyamine metabolism in proline-over-producing tobacco plants

Milena Cvikrová;Lenka Gemperlová;Jana Dobrá;Olga Martincová

150
Citations
The use of a conductivity measurement method for assessing freezing injury: I. Influence of leakage time, segment number, size and shape in a sample on evaluation of the degree of injury

Ilja Prášil;Jiřı́ Zámečnı́k

126
Citations
Analysis of proteome and frost tolerance in chromosome 5A and 5B reciprocal substitution lines between two winter wheats during long-term cold acclimation.

Pavel Vítámvás;Ilja T. Prášil;Klára Kosová;Sébastien Planchon

101
Citations
Relationships among Vernalization, Shoot Apex Development and Frost Tolerance in Wheat

Ilja Tom Prášil;Pavla Prášilová;Kateřina Pánková

91
Citations
The relationship between vernalization-and photoperiodically-regulated genes and the development of frost tolerance in wheat and barley

K. Kosová;I. T. Prášil;P. Vítámvás

80
Citations
Expression of dehydrin 5 during the development of frost tolerance in barley (Hordeum vulgare)

Klára Kosová;Ludmila Holková;Ilja Tom Prášil;Pavla Prášilová

79
Citations
Plant proteome responses to salinity stress – comparison of glycophytes and halophytes

Unknown

78
Citations
Comparative study of direct and indirect evaluations of frost tolerance in barley

I.T. Prášil;P. Prášilová;P. Mařík

78
Citations
Quantitative analysis of proteome extracted from barley crowns grown under different drought conditions.

Pavel Vítámvás;Milan Oldřich Urban;Zbyněk Škodáček;Klára Kosová

78
Citations
Light Quality and Intensity Modulate Cold Acclimation in Arabidopsis

Sylva Prerostova;Petre I Dobrev;Vojtech Knirsch;Jana Jarosova

69
Citations
The choice of reference gene set for assessing gene expression in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) under low temperature and drought stress.

Anna Janská;Jan Hodek;Pavel Svoboda;Jiří Zámečník

69
Citations