World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Materials Science

D-Index
83
Citations
24446
World Ranking
2376
National Ranking
138

H.W. Schock publication distribution in Materials Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Materials Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where H.W. Schock sits on this spectrum.

50–69 publications: 28 scientists 70–89 publications: 152 scientists 90–109 publications: 356 scientists 110–129 publications: 487 scientists 130–149 publications: 723 scientists 150–169 publications: 835 scientists 170–189 publications: 850 scientists 190–209 publications: 891 scientists 210–229 publications: 862 scientists 230–249 publications: 766 scientists 250–269 publications: 726 scientists 270–289 publications: 665 scientists 290–309 publications: 593 scientists 310–329 publications: 537 scientists 330–349 publications: 477 scientists 350–369 publications: 440 scientists 370–389 publications: 356 scientists 390–409 publications: 321 scientists 410–429 publications: 256 scientists 430–449 publications: 246 scientists 450–469 publications: 216 scientists 470–489 publications: 212 scientists 490–509 publications: 174 scientists 510–529 publications: 194 scientists 530–549 publications: 162 scientists 550–569 publications: 131 scientists 570–589 publications: 111 scientists 590–609 publications: 103 scientists 610–629 publications: 99 scientists 630–649 publications: 77 scientists 650–669 publications: 92 scientists 670–689 publications: 56 scientists 690–709 publications: 53 scientists 710–729 publications: 53 scientists 730–749 publications: 38 scientists 750–769 publications: 52 scientists 770–789 publications: 43 scientists 790–809 publications: 38 scientists 810–829 publications: 34 scientists 830–849 publications: 25 scientists 850–869 publications: 18 scientists 870–889 publications: 20 scientists 890–909 publications: 24 scientists 910–929 publications: 27 scientists 930–949 publications: 20 scientists 950–969 publications: 17 scientists 970–989 publications: 10 scientists 990–1,009 publications: 16 scientists 1,010–1,029 publications: 13 scientists 1,030–1,049 publications: 12 scientists 1,050–1,069 publications: 9 scientists 1,070–1,089 publications: 8 scientists 1,090–1,109 publications: 7 scientists 1,110–1,129 publications: 9 scientists 1,130–1,149 publications: 2 scientists 1,150–1,162 publications: 5 scientists 1,163+ publications: 100 scientists
50 publications 1,163+

This scientist: 413 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,163 publications or more.

H.W. Schock D-index placement in Materials Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Materials Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where H.W. Schock sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 211 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 450 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 612 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 612 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 598 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 657 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 667 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 621 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 597 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 610 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 587 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 606 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 533 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 490 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 469 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 378 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 421 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 359 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 323 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 299 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 230 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 210 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 195 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 203 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 175 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 175 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 142 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 121 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 117 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 107 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 88 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 85 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 68 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 62 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 57 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 45 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 49 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 50 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 34 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 38 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 28 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 24 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 33 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 28 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 20 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 23 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 17 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 12 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 17 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 21 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 13 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 11 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 13 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 4 scientists 164 D-Index: 3 scientists 165+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 165+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 165 D-Index or more.

Overview

H.W. Schock is affiliated with the University of Stuttgart in Germany. Their academic contributions are situated within this institution, which is recognized for research and development across various scientific disciplines.

While there are no recent papers listed or frequent co-authors documented, the profile indicates that H.W. Schock has not publicly associated with particular journals or frequently published venues. This absence of specific publication data suggests a low profile in mainstream academic publishing databases or possibly work in areas not widely indexed.

There is no available information on book publications by H.W. Schock, implying their academic output might primarily consist of articles, reports, or other forms of scholarly communication rather than monographs or edited volumes.

Main fields of study, subfields, and primary research topics for H.W. Schock have not been specified. This lack of detail prevents a direct understanding of their academic focus areas, which may span across broad or interdisciplinary domains.

There are no documented awards or recognitions associated with H.W. Schock. This absence indicates either an early-stage career, a focus on work outside of award-issuing bodies, or a preference for professional activity without formal accolade.

Best Publications

  • Photovoltaic materials, history, status and outlook

    Adolf Goetzberger;Christopher Hebling;Hans-Werner Schock

  • Chalcopyrite/defect chalcopyrite heterojunctions on the basis of CuInSe2

    D. Schmid;M. Ruckh;F. Grunwald;H. W. Schock

  • Electronic properties of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 heterojunction solar cells–recent achievements, current understanding, and future challenges

    U. Rau;H.W. Schock

  • Texture etched ZnO:Al coated glass substrates for silicon based thin film solar cells

    O Kluth;B Rech;L Houben;S Wieder

  • Cu2ZnSnS4 thin film solar cells from electroplated precursors: Novel low-cost perspective

    A. Ennaoui;M. Lux-Steiner;A. Weber;D. Abou-Ras

  • ZnO/CdS/CuInSe2 thin‐film solar cells with improved performance

    Lars Stolt;Jonas Hedström;John Kessler;Martin Ruckh

  • Electronic properties of CuGaSe2-based heterojunction solar cells. Part I. Transport analysis

    V. Nadenau;U. Rau;A. Jasenek;H. W. Schock

  • Effects of Sodium on Polycrystalline Cu(In,Ga)Se2 and Its Solar Cell Performance

    Leeor. Kronik;David Cahen;Hans Werner Schock

  • Cu2ZnSnS4 thin film solar cells by fast coevaporation

    Björn-Arvid Schubert;Björn Marsen;Sonja Cinque;Thomas Unold

  • Distinction between bulk and interface states in CuInSe2/CdS/ZnO by space charge spectroscopy

    R. Herberholz;M. Igalson;H. W. Schock

  • Interpretation of admittance, capacitance-voltage, and current-voltage signatures in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin film solar cells

    Tobias Eisenbarth;Thomas Unold;Raquel Caballero;Christian A. Kaufmann

  • A model for the successful growth of polycrystalline films of CuInSe2 by multisource physical vacuum evaporation

    Reiner Klenk;Thomas Walter;Hans-Werner Schock;David Cahen

  • Stability Issues of Cu(In,Ga)Se2-Based Solar Cells

    Jean-François Guillemoles;Leeor Kronik and;David Cahen;Uwe Rau

  • A new approach to high-efficiency solar cells by band gap grading in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 chalcopyrite semiconductors

    T Dullweber;G.H anna;U Rau;H.W Schock

  • Influence of the Ga-content on the bulk defect densities of Cu(In,Ga)Se2

    G. Hanna;A. Jasenek;U. Rau;H.W. Schock

  • CIGS‐based solar cells for the next millennium

    Hans-Werner Schock;Rommel Noufi

  • The crystallisation of Cu2ZnSnS4 thin film solar cell absorbers from co-electroplated Cu-Zn-Sn precursors

    R. Schurr;A. Hölzing;S. Jost;R. Hock

  • Model for electronic transport in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells

    Alex Niemegeers;Marc Burgelman;R. Herberholz;Uwe Rau

  • Chalcogenide Photovoltaics: Physics, Technologies, and Thin Film Devices

    Roland Scheer;Hans-Werner Schock

  • A comprehensive characterization of the interfaces in Mo/CIS/CdS/ZnO solar cell structures

    Dieter Schmid;Martin Ruckh;Hans Werner Schock

Frequent Co-Authors

Uwe Rau
Uwe Rau Forschungszentrum Jülich
Christian A. Kaufmann
Christian A. Kaufmann Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie
Thomas Unold
Thomas Unold Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie
Dimitrios Hariskos
Dimitrios Hariskos University of Stuttgart
Reiner Klenk
Reiner Klenk Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie
Roland Scheer
Roland Scheer Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
David Cahen
David Cahen Weizmann Institute of Science
Michael Powalla
Michael Powalla Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
M.Ch. Lux-Steiner
M.Ch. Lux-Steiner Johannes Kepler University of Linz
Jürgen H. Werner
Jürgen H. Werner University of Stuttgart

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing H.W. Schock

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles