World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
85
Citations
19498
World Ranking
14794
National Ranking
7478

Hugh F. Biller publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hugh F. Biller sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 291 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Hugh F. Biller D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hugh F. Biller sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hugh F. Biller was affiliated with Mount Sinai Hospital in the United States. Their career was primarily connected to this institution, where they contributed to the academic and clinical environment through their research activities.

Although there is limited specific information about their research publications, coauthors, or detailed fields of study, the available data shows no records of published papers, book publications, or awards attributed to this scientist.

Further details about the topics and subfields they focused on within their discipline are not present in the records. Likewise, there are no frequent publication venues or coauthors mentioned, which suggests that public bibliographic data is either scarce or not documented for this individual.

Given the absence of detailed publication records and documented frequent research collaborations, the scope of their academic output and scientific contributions cannot be elaborated upon in this profile.

Hugh F. Biller is recorded as deceased. Therefore, all descriptions relating to their career and contributions refer to their past work and affiliations. This profile aims to present verifiable factual information respecting the available data.

Best Publications

  • Microvascular Free Flaps in Head and Neck Reconstruction Report of 200 Cases and Review of Complications

    Mark L. Urken;Hubert Weinberg;Daniel Buchbinder;Juan F. Moscoso

  • Oromandibular reconstruction using microvascular composite flaps: report of 210 cases.

    Mark L. Urken;Daniel Buchbinder;Peter D. Costantino;Uttam Sinha

  • Oromandibular Reconstruction Using Microvascular Composite Free Flaps: Report of 71 Cases and a New Classification Scheme for Bony, Soft-Tissue, and Neurologic Defects

    Mark L. Urken;Hubert Weinberg;Carlin Vickery;Daniel Buchbinder

  • Functional evaluation following microvascular oromandibular reconstruction of the oral cancer patient: A comparative study of reconstructed and nonreconstructed patients

    Mark L. Urken;Daniel Buchbinder;Hubert Weinberg;Carlin Vickery

  • Inverted papilloma: A report of 112 cases

    William Lawson;Bryan T. Ho;Christopher M. Shaari;Hugh F. Biller

  • PATIENT SURVIVAL FACTORS IN PARANASAL SINUS MUCORMYCOSIS

    Andrew Blitzer;William Lawson;Bert R. Meyers;Hugh F. Biller

  • An analysis of 133 pectoralis major myocutaneous flaps.

    Se-Min Baek;William Lawson;Hugh F. Biller

  • Sinonasal tumors and inflammatory tissues: differentiation with MR imaging.

    P M Som;M D Shapiro;H F Biller;C Sasaki

  • A Systematic Approach to Functional Reconstruction of the Oral Cavity Following Partial and Total Glossectomy

    Mark L. Urken;Juan F. Moscoso;William Lawson;Hugh F. Biller

  • Tumors of the parapharyngeal space: preoperative evaluation, diagnosis and surgical approaches.

    Peter M. Som;Hugh F. Biller;William Lawson

  • Treatment outcomes in the management of inverted papilloma: an analysis of 160 cases.

    William Lawson;Matthew R. Kaufman;Hugh F. Biller

  • Vascularized bone flaps in oromandibular reconstruction. A comparative anatomic study of bone stock from various donor sites to assess suitability for enosseous dental implants.

    Juan F. Moscoso;Jeffrey Keller;Eric Genden;Hubert Weinberg

  • The internal oblique-iliac crest osseomyocutaneous free flap in oromandibular reconstruction. Report of 20 cases.

    Mark L. Urken;Carlin Vickery;Hubert Weinberg;Daniel Buchbinder

  • Primary Placement of Osseointegrated Implants in Microvascular Mandibular Reconstruction

    Mark L. Urken;Daniel Buchbinder;Hubert Weinberg;Carlin Vickery

  • The innervation of the human larynx.

    Ira Sanders;Bei-Lian Wu;Liancai Mu;Youzhu Li

  • The neurofasciocutaneous radial forearm flap in head and neck reconstruction: a preliminary report.

    Mark L. Urken;Hubert Weinberg;Carlin Vickery;Hugh F. Biller

  • Esthesioneuroblastoma: surgical treatment without radiation.

    Hugh F. Biller;William Lawson;Ved P. Sachdev;Peter Som

  • Quantifying the spread of botulinum toxin through muscle fascia.

    Christopher M. Shaari;Elaina George;Bei-Lian Wu;Hugh F. Biller

  • Atlas of Regional and Free Flaps for Head and Neck Reconstruction

    Mark L. Urken;Mack L Cheney;Michael J. Sullivan;Hugh F. Biller

  • The pectoralis major myocutaneous island flap for reconstruction of the head and neck.

    Se‐Min Baek;Hugh F. Biller;Yosef P. Krespi;William Lawson

Frequent Co-Authors

William Lawson
William Lawson Stony Brook University
Peter M. Som
Peter M. Som Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
James F. Holland
James F. Holland Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Paul J. Catalano
Paul J. Catalano Harvard University
Richard M. Rosenfeld
Richard M. Rosenfeld SUNY Downstate Medical Center
Robert A. Zimmerman
Robert A. Zimmerman Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
William P. Dillon
William P. Dillon University of California, San Francisco
Eugene N. Myers
Eugene N. Myers University of Pittsburgh
Donald A. Fischman
Donald A. Fischman Cornell University
William T. Shearer
William T. Shearer Baylor College of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring medical professionals often explore alternative or complementary online degrees to broaden their career options. For those interested in advancing their nursing expertise and leadership, a phd nursing education online offers flexibility and affordability. This path is ideal for nurses seeking roles in academia or research.

If you're an RN looking to advance your credentials, there are several cheap rn to bsn programs available online. These programs are designed to be cost-effective and accessible, allowing you to earn a higher degree without putting your career on hold.

For those coming from non-nursing backgrounds but want to quickly start a nursing career, direct entry msn programs provide an accelerated path to a Master’s in Nursing. These programs combine foundational nursing knowledge with advanced practice skills, enabling faster career transitions.

If admissions standards are a concern, look into nursing programs with high acceptance rates. These options can help more students begin their journeys without facing highly competitive admissions.

Best Scientists Citing Hugh F. Biller

Recently Published Articles