World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 37 8344 8040 280 269 395 6121

Günter Wozny publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Günter Wozny between 1980 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Günter Wozny published across 43 years, from 1980 to 2022, averaging 10 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2012. 4 of the 429 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2012. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 5 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 3 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 9 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 20 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 17 publications 2003: 16 publications 2004: 19 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 19 publications 2007: 20 publications 2008: 22 publications 2009: 22 publications 2010: 26 publications 2011: 30 publications 2012: 31 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 1 publication
1980 2022

429 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Günter Wozny: publications per year, 1980 to 2022
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 5
1982 2
1983 1
1984 3
1985 1
1986 0
1987 3
1988 2
1989 5
1990 1
1991 2
1992 9
1993 3
1994 6
1995 9
1996 4
1997 8
1998 6
1999 8
2000 20
2001 7
2002 17
2003 16
2004 19
2005 11
2006 19
2007 20
2008 22
2009 22
2010 26
2011 30
2012 31
2013 14
2014 20
2015 13
2016 17
2017 11
2018 5
2019 4
2020 2
2021 3
2022 1
Total 429
Download as CSV

Günter Wozny publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Günter Wozny sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 388–397 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 395 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108 395
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Günter Wozny D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Günter Wozny sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312 37
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Günter Wozny is affiliated with the Technical University of Berlin in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on chemical engineering, materials science, and engineering, with a specialized emphasis on catalysis and related subfields.

The scientist's work covers several specific subfields including catalysis, materials chemistry, mechanical engineering, organic chemistry, and process chemistry and technology. Within these areas, Günter Wozny has contributed research on topics such as catalysis and oxidation reactions, catalytic processes in materials science, catalysts for methane reforming, carbon dioxide capture technologies, oxidative organic chemistry reactions, carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis, and modeling and simulation systems.

Frequent collaborators in their work include Jens-Uwe Repke, Hamid Reza Godini, Reinhard Schomäcker, Oliver Görke, and Mohammadreza Azadi.

Scientific publications by Günter Wozny have appeared in several venues, including Catalysts, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, Computers & Chemical Engineering, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, and Chemical Engineering & Technology. The following are recent papers authored or co-authored by Wozny, reflecting their contributions:

  • Reaction engineering of oxidative coupling of methane (2021), Process Safety and Environmental Protection
  • Multi-Scale Analysis of Integrated C1 (CH4 and CO2) Utilization Catalytic Processes: Impacts of Catalysts Characteristics up to Industrial-Scale Process Flowsheeting, Part II: Techno-Economic Analysis of Integrated C1 Utilization Process Scenarios (2020), Catalysts
  • Multi-Scale Analysis of Integrated C1 (CH4 and CO2) Utilization Catalytic Processes: Impacts of Catalysts Characteristics up to Industrial-Scale Process Flowsheeting, Part I: Experimental Analysis of Catalytic Low-Pressure CO2 to Methanol Conversion (2020), Catalysts
  • Miniplant-Scale Demonstration of Ethylene Adsorption Separation in Downstream of an Oxidative Coupling of Methane Process (2021), Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
  • PlantDesign - Prototypical implementation of an integrated engineering tool (2021), Computers & Chemical Engineering

Best Publications

  • Chance constrained programming approach to process optimization under uncertainty

    Pu Li;Harvey Arellano-Garcia;Günter Wozny

  • Nonlinear Chance-Constrained Process Optimization under Uncertainty

    Moritz Wendt;and Pu Li;Günter Wozny

  • Brief A probabilistically constrained model predictive controller

    Pu Li;Moritz Wendt;GüNter Wozny

  • Liquid−Liquid Phase Equilibrium in Glycerol−Methanol−Methyl Oleate and Glycerol−Monoolein−Methyl Oleate Ternary Systems

    Devender S. Negi;Felix Sobotka;Tobias Kimmel;Günter Wozny

  • A Modular Approach to Sustainability Assessment and Decision Support in Chemical Process Design

    Mohamad R. Othman;Jens Uwe Repke;Günter Wozny;Yinlun Huang

  • Fluid dynamics in multiphase distillation processes in packed towers

    Andreas Hoffmann;Ilja Ausner;Jens-Uwe Repke;Günter Wozny

  • Nonlinear ill-posed problem analysis in model-based parameter estimation and experimental design

    C C Diana López;Tilman Barz;Stefan Körkel;Günter Wozny

  • Robust model predictive control under chance constraints

    Pu Li;Moritz Wendt;Günter Wozny

  • Optimization of simulated moving bed plants with low efficient stationary phases: separation of fructose and glucose

    York A Beste;Mark Lisso;Günter Wozny;Wolfgang Arlt

  • Model based optimization of the intermittent aeration profile for SBRs under partial nitrification

    M.N. Cruz Bournazou;K. Hooshiar;H. Arellano-Garcia;G. Wozny

  • A quasi-sequential approach to large-scale dynamic optimization problems

    Weirong Hong;Shuqing Wang;Pu Li;Günter Wozny

  • Heuristic design of pressure swing adsorption: a preliminary study

    S. Jain;A.S. Moharir;P. Li;G. Wozny

  • Optimization of a Semibatch Distillation Process with Model Validation on the Industrial Site

    Pu Li;and H. Arellano Garcia;Günter Wozny;Erich Reuter

  • Detailed Investigation of Multiphase (Gas–Liquid and Gas–Liquid–Liquid) Flow Behaviour on Inclined Plates

    A. Hoffmann;I. Ausner;J.-.U. Repke;G. Wozny

  • Pressure swing batch distillation for homogeneous azeotropic separation

    Unknown

  • Texture influence on liquid-side mass transfer

    Martin Kohrt;Ilja Ausner;Günter Wozny;Jens-Uwe Repke

  • A startup model for simulation of batch distillation starting from a cold state

    Lin Wang;Pu Li;Günter Wozny;Shuqing Wang

  • Pilot scale investigations of the removal of carbon dioxide from hydrocarbon gas streams using poly (ethylene oxide)–poly (butylene terephthalate) PolyActive™) thin film composite membranes

    Torsten Brinkmann;Céline Naderipour;Jan Pohlmann;Jan Wind

  • Time optimal start-up strategies for reactive distillation columns

    Frauke Reepmeyer;Jens-Uwe Repke;Günter Wozny

  • Techno-economic analysis of integrating the methane oxidative coupling and methane reforming processes

    Hamid Reza Godini;Shengnan Xiao;Stanislav Jašo;Steffen Stünkel

  • Stochastic Optimization for Operating Chemical Processes under Uncertainty

    René Henrion;Pu Li;Andris Möller;Marc C. Steinbach

  • Sol–gel method for synthesis of Mn–Na2WO4/SiO2 catalyst for methane oxidative coupling

    H.R. Godini;A. Gili;O. Görke;S. Arndt

  • Plantwide Optimizing Control of a continuous bioethanol production process

    Silvia Ochoa;Günter Wozny;Jens-Uwe Repke

Frequent Co-Authors

Pu Li
Pu Li Taiyuan University of Technology
Reinhard Schomäcker
Reinhard Schomäcker Technical University of Berlin
Matthias Kraume
Matthias Kraume Technical University of Berlin
Lorenz T. Biegler
Lorenz T. Biegler Carnegie Mellon University
Jürgen Gmehling
Jürgen Gmehling Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg
Mohammadreza Omidkhah
Mohammadreza Omidkhah Tarbiat Modares University
Kai Sundmacher
Kai Sundmacher Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems
Andrzej Górak
Andrzej Górak TU Dortmund University
Uwe Kruger
Uwe Kruger Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Jörg Raisch
Jörg Raisch Technical University of Berlin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Engineering and Technology in the USA opens up a world of online education options and flexible career pathways. Many students are seeking alternatives that fit into busy lives, whether through part-time study or accelerated programs. For those interested in urban infrastructure and city growth, consider pursuing an urban development degree online—a rapidly growing field blending technology, design, and sustainability.

If you need a faster route to upskilling, 6 month master's degree online options provide a quick pathway to advanced credentials. For those looking for highly targeted training, certificate programs can open doors to high-paying tech and engineering careers without committing to a full degree.

Online education platforms are also making it easier for diverse learners to participate. Flexible learning options such as online school for moms can help parents balance family responsibilities while pursuing their career goals in engineering and technology.

Best Scientists Citing Günter Wozny

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles