World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
47
Citations
7810
World Ranking
5828
National Ranking
2122

Greg Yarwood publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Greg Yarwood sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 144 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Greg Yarwood D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Greg Yarwood sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Greg Yarwood is affiliated with Business International Corporation in the United States. Their research predominantly focuses on environmental science and earth and planetary sciences, with a significant emphasis on atmospheric science as a core subfield of study. The scientist's work spans across related areas including health, toxicology and mutagenesis, global and planetary change, environmental engineering, and renewable energy, sustainability and the environment.

The main topics covered in Greg Yarwood's research include atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, air quality and health impacts, air quality monitoring and forecasting, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, and atmospheric ozone and climate. Additionally, their studies touch upon vehicle emissions and performance as well as carbon dioxide capture technologies.

Frequent publication venues for Greg Yarwood's work are:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Atmospheric Environment
  • Atmosphere
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Nature Communications

They have collaborated multiple times with researchers such as Yangjun Wang, Ling Huang, Li Li, Eladio Knipping, and Jeremiah Johnson, indicating a network of frequent co-authorship in the atmospheric and environmental science communities.

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Greg Yarwood include:

  • Recommendations on benchmarks for numerical air quality model applications in China - Part 1: PM 2.5 and chemical species, 2021, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Simulation of secondary organic aerosol over the Yangtze River Delta region: The impacts from the emissions of intermediate volatility organic compounds and the SOA modeling framework, 2020, Atmospheric Environment
  • Contributions of international sources to PM2.5 in South Korea, 2021, Atmospheric Environment
  • Evaluating NO x emissions and their effect on O 3 production in Texas using TROPOMI NO 2 and HCHO, 2022, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Economy-wide evaluation of CO2 and air quality impacts of electrification in the United States, 2022, Nature Communications

Best Publications

  • Recommendations on statistics and benchmarks to assess photochemical model performance.

    Christopher Emery;Zhen Liu;Armistead G Russell;M Talat Odman

  • Transformation processes involving mercury species in the atmosphere — results from a literature survey

    William H. Schroeder;Greg Yarwood;Hiromi Niki

  • An evaluation of the mechanism of nitrous acid formation in the urban atmosphere

    J. G. Calvert;G. Yarwood;A. M. Dunker

  • Impact of an Updated Carbon Bond Mechanism on Predictions from the CMAQ Modeling System: Preliminary Assessment

    Golam Sarwar;Deborah Luecken;Greg Yarwood;Gary Z. Whitten

  • A new condensed toluene mechanism for Carbon Bond: CB05-TU

    Gary Z. Whitten;Gookyoung Heo;Yosuke Kimura;Elena McDonald-Buller

  • The decoupled direct method for sensitivity analysis in a three-dimensional air quality model--implementation, accuracy, and efficiency.

    Alan M Dunker;Greg Yarwood;Jerome P Ortmann;Gary M Wilson

  • Operational model evaluation for particulate matter in Europe and North America in the context of AQMEII

    Efisio Solazzo;Roberto Bianconi;Guido Pirovano;Volker Matthias

  • Comparison of source apportionment and source sensitivity of ozone in a three-dimensional air quality model.

    Alan M. Dunker;Greg Yarwood;Jerome P. Ortmann;Gary M. Wilson

  • Development and application of a computationally efficient particulate matter apportionment algorithm in a three-dimensional chemical transport model

    Kristina M. Wagstrom;Spyros N. Pandis;Spyros N. Pandis;Greg Yarwood;Gary M. Wilson

  • Comparison of Source Apportionment and Sensitivity Analysis in a Particulate Matter Air Quality Model

    Bonyoung Koo;Gary M. Wilson;Ralph E. Morris;Alan M. Dunker

  • 1.5-Dimensional volatility basis set approach for modeling organic aerosol in CAMx and CMAQ

    Bonyoung Koo;Eladio Knipping;Greg Yarwood

  • Multipollutant modeling of ozone, reactive nitrogen and HAPs across the continental US with CMAQ-CB6

    D.J. Luecken;G. Yarwood;W.T. Hutzell

  • Model evaluation and ensemble modelling of surface-level ozone in Europe and North America in the context of AQMEII

    Efisio Solazzo;Roberto Bianconi;Robert Vautard;K. Wyat Appel

  • Examining the impact of heterogeneous nitryl chloride production on air quality across the United States

    G. Sarwar;H. Simon;P. Bhave;G. Yarwood

  • Direct evidence for chlorine-enhanced urban ozone formation in Houston, Texas

    Paul L Tanaka;Daniel D Riemer;Sunghye Chang;Greg Yarwood

  • Model sensitivity evaluation for organic carbon using two multi-pollutant air quality models that simulate regional haze in the southeastern United States

    Ralph E. Morris;Bonyoung Koo;Alex Guenther;Greg Yarwood

  • Ozone Impacts of Natural Gas Development in the Haynesville Shale

    Susan Kemball-Cook;Amnon Bar-Ilan;John Grant;Lynsey Parker

  • Development and application of a three-dimensional aerosol chemical transport model, PMCAMx

    Timothy M. Gaydos;Rob Pinder;Bonyoung Koo;Kathleen M. Fahey

  • Recommendations on benchmarks for numerical air quality model applications in China – Part 1: PM 2.5 and chemical species

    Ling Huang;Yonghui Zhu;Hehe Zhai;Shuhui Xue

  • Regional and global modeling estimates of policy relevant background ozone over the United States

    Christopher Emery;Jaegun Jung;Nicole Downey;Jeremiah Johnson

  • UPDATES TO THE CARBON BOND MECHANISM FOR VERSION 6 (CB6)

    Greg Yarwood;Jaegun Jung;Gary Z. Whitten;Gookyoung Heo

Frequent Co-Authors

David T. Allen
David T. Allen The University of Texas at Austin
Guido Pirovano
Guido Pirovano World Meteorological Organization
Christian Hogrefe
Christian Hogrefe Environmental Protection Agency
Jesper H. Christensen
Jesper H. Christensen Aarhus University
Efisio Solazzo
Efisio Solazzo European Food Safety Authority
Jørgen Brandt
Jørgen Brandt Aarhus University
Ulas Im
Ulas Im Aarhus University
Spyros N. Pandis
Spyros N. Pandis University of Patras
Ranjeet S. Sokhi
Ranjeet S. Sokhi University of Hertfordshire
Bertrand Bessagnet
Bertrand Bessagnet École Normale Supérieure

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to various interdisciplinary career options. For those interested in public administration and environmental policy, pursuing one of the mpa one year programs can provide the skills needed to influence sustainable community and governmental decisions effectively.

Social factors play a crucial role in environmental issues, making degrees like online bachelors degree programs in sociology relevant for understanding human behaviors and societal impacts on the environment. These programs complement environmental studies by offering insights into social dynamics and policy development.

For educators and professionals seeking advanced qualifications, many look to online edd programs no dissertation, which offer flexible, research-focused pathways without the lengthy dissertation process. These degrees are ideal for those aiming to integrate environmental education into their careers.

Additionally, transitioning from teaching roles to leadership positions can be streamlined through eds to edd programs online, which prepare candidates for executive responsibilities within environmental organizations or educational institutions focusing on sustainability.

Best Scientists Citing Greg Yarwood

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles