World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 53 4846 4711 2259 2180 307 10734

George Michailidis publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by George Michailidis between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. George Michailidis published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 11.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 34 publications in 2019. 26 of the 411 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 34. Peak 34 publications in 2019. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 24 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 21 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 34 publications 2020: 24 publications 2021: 34 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 10 publications
1990 2025

411 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
George Michailidis: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 1
1992 0
1993 1
1994 0
1995 1
1996 1
1997 0
1998 2
1999 0
2000 5
2001 2
2002 6
2003 4
2004 6
2005 8
2006 12
2007 10
2008 13
2009 15
2010 24
2011 20
2012 18
2013 23
2014 17
2015 21
2016 17
2017 15
2018 18
2019 34
2020 24
2021 34
2022 18
2023 14
2024 16
2025 10
Total 411
Download as CSV

George Michailidis publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George Michailidis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 302–311 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 307 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250 307
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

George Michailidis D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George Michailidis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518 53
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2010 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)

Overview

George Michailidis is affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Computer Science with contributions across various subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Molecular Biology, Statistics and Probability, Management Science and Operations Research, and Control and Systems Engineering.

The scientist's body of work addresses multiple topics, notably Statistical Methods and Inference, Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies, Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research, Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques, Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques, Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference, and Fault Detection and Control Systems.

George Michailidis has published extensively with notable contributions to the following venues:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Statistica Sinica
  • Quality Engineering
  • Automatica
  • IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing

The researcher has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Abolfazl Safikhani (11 collaborations)
  • Jiahe Lin (9 collaborations)
  • Kshitij Khare (9 collaborations)
  • Subramaniam Pennathur (8 collaborations)
  • Davoud Ataee Tarzanagh (7 collaborations)

Among recent publications, the following papers stand out:

  • Gut microbiota dysbiosis and altered tryptophan catabolism contribute to autoimmunity in lupus-susceptible mice, 2020, Science Translational Medicine
  • Lipidomic approaches to dissect dysregulated lipid metabolism in kidney disease, 2021, Nature Reviews Nephrology
  • Unsupervised Multi-Omics Data Integration Methods: A Comprehensive Review, 2022, Frontiers in Genetics
  • DAdam: A Consensus-Based Distributed Adaptive Gradient Method for Online Optimization, 2022, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
  • Optimism-Based Adaptive Regulation of Linear-Quadratic Systems, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control

George Michailidis has been recognized as a Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA) since 2010.

Best Publications

  • Joint estimation of multiple graphical models

    Jian Guo;Elizaveta Levina;George Michailidis;Ji Zhu

  • Critical limitations of consensus clustering in class discovery

    Yasin Șenbabaoğlu;Yasin Șenbabaoğlu;George Michailidis;Jun Z. Li

  • The Gifi system of descriptive multivariate analysis

    George Michailidis;Jan de Leeuw

  • Sequential Experiment Design for Contour Estimation From Complex Computer Codes

    Pritam Ranjan;Derek Bingham;George Michailidis

  • A non-negative matrix factorization method for detecting modules in heterogeneous omics multi-modal data

    Zi Yang;George Michailidis

  • Tissue-specific metabolic reprogramming drives nutrient flux in diabetic complications

    Kelli M. Sas;Pradeep Kayampilly;Jaeman Byun;Viji Nair

  • Sparse network modeling and metscape-based visualization methods for the analysis of large-scale metabolomics data.

    Sumanta Basu;Sumanta Basu;William Duren;Charles R. Evans;Charles F. Burant

  • Discovering graphical Granger causality using the truncating lasso penalty

    Ali Shojaie;George Michailidis

  • Metabolomic Profiling Reveals Potential Markers and Bioprocesses Altered in Bladder Cancer Progression

    Nagireddy Putluri;Ali Shojaie;Ali Shojaie;Vihas T Vasu;Vihas T Vasu;Shaiju K Vareed

  • Penalized Likelihood Methods for Estimation of Sparse High Dimensional Directed Acyclic Graphs

    Ali Shojaie;George Michailidis

  • Electric Power Allocation in a Network of Fast Charging Stations

    I. S. Bayram;G. Michailidis;M. Devetsikiotis;F. Granelli

  • Interconnectedness in the Interbank Market

    Celso Brunetti;Jeffrey H. Harris;Shawn Mankad;George Michailidis

  • Metabolomics and Diabetes: Analytical and Computational Approaches

    Kelli M. Sas;Alla Karnovsky;George Michailidis;Subramaniam Pennathur

  • Analysis of Gene Sets Based on the Underlying Regulatory Network

    Ali Shojaie;George Michailidis

  • Quantitative proteomic profiling of prostate cancer reveals a role for miR-128 in prostate cancer

    Amjad P. Khan;Laila M. Poisson;Vadiraja B. Bhat;Damian Fermin

  • Lipidomic approaches to dissect dysregulated lipid metabolism in kidney disease.

    Judy Baek;Chenchen He;Farsad Afshinnia;George Michailidis

  • Local Vote Decision Fusion for Target Detection in Wireless Sensor Networks

    N. Katenka;E. Levina;G. Michailidis

  • LASS: a tool for the local analysis of self-similarity

    Stilian Stoev;Murad S. Taqqu;Cheolwoo Park;George Michailidis

  • Network tomography: A review and recent developments

    Earl Lawrence;George Michailidis;Vijayan N. Nair;Bowei Xi

  • Graph-Based Semisupervised Learning

    M. Culp;G. Michailidis

  • Electric Power Allocation in a Network of Fast Charging Stations

    I. Safak Bayram;George Michailidis;Michael Devetsikiotis;Fabrizio Granelli

  • A REVIEW AND RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

    Earl Lawrence;George Michailidis;Vijayan N. Nair

  • Estimation in High-dimensional Vector Autoregressive Models

    Sumanta Basu;George Michailidis

Frequent Co-Authors

Nagireddy Putluri
Nagireddy Putluri Baylor College of Medicine
Ambuj Tewari
Ambuj Tewari University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Michael Devetsikiotis
Michael Devetsikiotis University of New Mexico
Elizaveta Levina
Elizaveta Levina University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Michael Ittmann
Michael Ittmann Baylor College of Medicine
Hosagrahar V. Jagadish
Hosagrahar V. Jagadish University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Gilbert S. Omenn
Gilbert S. Omenn University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jan de Leeuw
Jan de Leeuw University of California, Los Angeles
Philip C. Andrews
Philip C. Andrews University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Cristian Coarfa
Cristian Coarfa Baylor College of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a wide range of flexible study options and career opportunities. Many students now explore 2 year online degrees, which provide foundational skills and can lead directly to entry-level tech roles or further study.

For those seeking to boost their credentials quickly, there are easy certifications that pay well in fields like IT support, cybersecurity, and cloud computing. These certifications can often be completed in a matter of months and can make you job-ready for in-demand roles.

If you want to advance your knowledge further, consider the shortest online masters degree programs. Many reputable universities offer accelerated pathways that allow you to earn a graduate degree in as little as one year, saving both time and money.

Finally, it’s important to choose your degree wisely. Explore the most valuable masters degrees to ensure that your investment aligns with today’s job market and future trends. This can help maximize both your career growth and salary potential.

Best Scientists Citing George Michailidis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles