World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Florimond De Smedt

Florimond De Smedt

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
46
Citations
7587
World Ranking
6122
National Ranking
86

Florimond De Smedt publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Florimond De Smedt sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 269 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Florimond De Smedt D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Florimond De Smedt sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Application of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for landslide susceptibility mapping: A case study from the Tinau watershed, west Nepal

    Unknown

  • GIS-based recharge estimation by coupling surface–subsurface water balances

    Okke Batelaan;Okke Batelaan;F De Smedt

  • A diffusive transport approach for flow routing in GIS-based flood modeling

    Y.B. Liu;S. Gebremeskel;F. De Smedt;L. Hoffmann

  • A distributed model for water and energy transfer between soil, plants and atmosphere (WetSpa)

    Zhong-Min Wang;Okke Batelaan;F. De Smedt

  • Lineament extraction and analysis, comparison of LANDSAT ETM and ASTER imagery. Case study: Suoimuoi tropical karst catchment, Vietnam

    L. Q. Hung;O. Batelaan;F. De Smedt

  • Regional groundwater discharge: phreatophyte mapping, groundwater modelling and impact analysis of land-use change

    Okke Batelaan;F De Smedt;L Triest

  • Effects of climate change on the groundwater system in the Grote-Nete catchment, Belgium

    S. T. Woldeamlak;O. Batelaan;F. De Smedt

  • WetSpass: A flexible, GIS based, distributed recharge methodology for regional groundwater modelling

    Okke Batelaan;Florimond De Smedt

  • Solute Transfer Through Columns of Glass Beads

    Unknown

  • Landslide susceptibility mapping using the weight of evidence method in the Tinau watershed, Nepal

    Unknown

  • Application of an analytical hierarchical process approach for landslide susceptibility mapping in A Luoi district, Thua Thien Hue Province, Vietnam

    Unknown

  • Application of a spatially distributed water balance model for assessing surface water and groundwater resources in the Geba basin, Tigray, Ethiopia

    Tesfamichael Gebreyohannes;Tesfamichael Gebreyohannes;Florimond De Smedt;Kristine Walraevens;Solomon Gebresilassie

  • Intercomparison of five lumped and distributed models for catchment runoff and extreme flow simulation

    Thomas Vansteenkiste;Mohsen Tavakoli;Niels Van Steenbergen;Florimond De Smedt

  • Distributed Hydrological Modeling and Sensitivity Analysis in Torysa Watershed, Slovakia

    Unknown

  • Results of the DMIP 2 Oklahoma experiments

    Michael B. Smith;Victor Koren;Ziya Zhang;Yu Zhang

  • Stochastic capture zone delineation within the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation methodology: Conditioning on head observations

    L. Feyen;Keith J. Beven;F. De Smedt;J. E. Freer

  • A generalized solution for solute flow in soils with mobile and immobile water

    Unknown

  • Flood Modeling for Complex Terrain Using GIS and Remote Sensed Information

    Unknown

  • Evaluation of the Groundwater Quality Using the Water Quality Index and Geostatistical Analysis in the Dier al-Balah Governorate, Gaza Strip, Palestine

    Unknown

  • WetSpa Model Application for Assessing Reforestation Impacts on Floods in Margecany–Hornad Watershed, Slovakia

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Okke Batelaan
Okke Batelaan Flinders University
Jozef Deckers
Jozef Deckers KU Leuven
Kristine Walraevens
Kristine Walraevens Ghent University
Alain Dassargues
Alain Dassargues University of Liège
Ludwig Triest
Ludwig Triest Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Laurent Pfister
Laurent Pfister Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology
Jan Nyssen
Jan Nyssen Ghent University
Jan Moeyersons
Jan Moeyersons Royal Museum for Central Africa
Luc Feyen
Luc Feyen Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open doors to diverse career opportunities. Many students seek programs that balance quality education with affordability, making the most affordable online general studies degree programs a valuable option for building a foundational knowledge base.

If you're looking for a degree that offers flexibility and a manageable workload, the easiest bachelor's degree programs can be a good starting point. These programs often provide practical skills without overwhelming academic pressure, helping students stay motivated as they enter environmental fields.

Specializing in earth sciences is also popular among environmental enthusiasts. Online programs like the online geology programs offer in-depth study of physical landscapes, essential for careers in conservation and resource management.

Moreover, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) skills are highly sought after in environmental careers. Pursuing gis degree programs equips students with advanced mapping and spatial analysis capabilities, instrumental in addressing environmental challenges through data-driven solutions.

Best Scientists Citing Florimond De Smedt

Recently Published Articles