World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 81 16686 15698 669 640 784 23258

Fabio Facchinetti publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Fabio Facchinetti between 1975 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Fabio Facchinetti published across 52 years, from 1975 to 2026, averaging 16.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 43 publications in 2021. 18 of the 847 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 43. Peak 43 publications in 2021. 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 5 publications 1978: 5 publications 1979: 3 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 7 publications 1982: 13 publications 1983: 17 publications 1984: 19 publications 1985: 33 publications 1986: 34 publications 1987: 33 publications 1988: 28 publications 1989: 20 publications 1990: 15 publications 1991: 14 publications 1992: 15 publications 1993: 13 publications 1994: 14 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 16 publications 1998: 17 publications 1999: 17 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 19 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 24 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 29 publications 2020: 41 publications 2021: 43 publications 2022: 43 publications 2023: 26 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 17 publications 2026: 1 publication
1975 2026

847 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Fabio Facchinetti: publications per year, 1975 to 2026
Year Publications
1975 1
1976 0
1977 5
1978 5
1979 3
1980 2
1981 7
1982 13
1983 17
1984 19
1985 33
1986 34
1987 33
1988 28
1989 20
1990 15
1991 14
1992 15
1993 13
1994 14
1995 10
1996 5
1997 16
1998 17
1999 17
2000 11
2001 12
2002 12
2003 11
2004 13
2005 19
2006 15
2007 13
2008 16
2009 15
2010 15
2011 14
2012 15
2013 13
2014 13
2015 13
2016 14
2017 24
2018 17
2019 29
2020 41
2021 43
2022 43
2023 26
2024 16
2025 17
2026 1
Total 847
Download as CSV

Fabio Facchinetti publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fabio Facchinetti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 781–800 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 784 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217 784
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Fabio Facchinetti D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fabio Facchinetti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972 81
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Fabio Facchinetti is affiliated with the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia in Italy. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a significant specialization in obstetrics and gynecology. Across their scholarly work, they have explored various aspects of maternal and fetal health, reproductive medicine, and public health.

The scientist has published extensively, with key areas of investigation including pregnancy and preeclampsia studies, maternal and fetal healthcare, and maternal and perinatal health interventions. Other notable topics in their research portfolio include gestational diabetes management, endometriosis research and treatment, reproductive health and contraception, and ovarian function and disorders.

Fabio Facchinetti has contributed to several publications in well-known venues such as:

  • The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
  • The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care
  • Minerva Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
  • Annals of Oncology

The scientist has collaborated with a number of frequent coauthors, including:

  • Giovanni Grandi
  • Francesca Monari
  • Daniela Menichini
  • Isabella Neri
  • Emma Bertucci

Among Fabio Facchinetti's recent papers are:

  • Inositols in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: An Overview on the Advances, 2020, Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism
  • Inositols: From Established Knowledge to Novel Approaches, 2021, International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Clinical Findings and Disease Severity in Hospitalized Pregnant Women With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), 2020, Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Vaginal delivery in SARS-CoV-2-infected pregnant women in Northern Italy: a retrospective analysis, 2020, BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
  • Marked T cell activation, senescence, exhaustion and skewing towards TH17 in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, 2020, Nature Communications

Their expertise also encompasses epidemiology and pediatrics, perinatology, and child health, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to medical research in reproductive and maternal care.

Best Publications

  • Marked T cell activation, senescence, exhaustion and skewing towards TH17 in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.

    Sara De Biasi;Marianna Meschiari;Lara Gibellini;Caterina Bellinazzi

  • Effect of diet and physical activity based interventions in pregnancy on gestational weight gain and pregnancy outcomes: meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials

    Ewelina Rogozinska;Nadine Marlin;Ana Pilar Betran;Arne Astrup

  • Oral magnesium successfully relieves premenstrual mood changes.

    Fabio Facchinetti;Paola Borella;Grazia Sances;Loredana Fioroni

  • Vaginal delivery in SARS-CoV-2-infected pregnant women in Northern Italy: a retrospective analysis.

    Enrico Ferrazzi;Enrico Ferrazzi;Luigi Frigerio;Valeria Savasi;Patrizia Vergani

  • Magnesium prophylaxis of menstrual migraine: effects on intracellular magnesium.

    Fabio Facchinetti;Grazia Sances;Paola Borella;Andrea R. Genazzani

  • Hyperemesis gravidarum complicated by Wernicke encephalopathy: background, case report, and review of the literature.

    Giuseppe Chiossi;Isabella Neri;Milena Cavazzuti;Gianpaolo Basso

  • Thrombophilia is significantly associated with severe preeclampsia: results of a large-scale, case-controlled study.

    Giorgio Mello;Elena Parretti;Luca Marozio;Cristina Pizzi

  • Characteristics of menstrual and nonmenstrual attacks in women with menstrually related migraine referred to headache centres

    F. Granella;G. Sances;G. Allais;Re Nappi;Re Nappi

  • Effects of antenatal diet and physical activity on maternal and fetal outcomes: Individual patient data meta-analysis and health economic evaluation

    Ewelina Rogozińska;Nadine Marlin;Louise Jackson;Girish Rayanagoudar

  • Characteristics of headache at menopause: a clinico-epidemiologic study

    Isabella Neri;F. Granella;R. Nappi;G. C. Manzoni

  • Central Deficiency of β-Endorphin in Alcohol Addicts

    A. R. Genazzani;G. Nappi;F. Facchinetti;G. L. Mazzella

  • Antiphospholipid antibody profile based obstetric outcomes of primary antiphospholipid syndrome: the PREGNANTS study.

    Gabriele Saccone;Vincenzo Berghella;Giuseppe Maria Maruotti;Tullio Ghi

  • Cervical length changes during preterm cervical ripening: effects of 17-α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate

    Fabio Facchinetti;Simone Paganelli;Giuseppina Comitini;Giulia Dante

  • Effects of myo-inositol in women with PCOS: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

    V Unfer;G Carlomagno;G Dante;F Facchinetti

  • Long QT syndrome-associated mutations in intrauterine fetal death.

    Lia Crotti;David J. Tester;Wendy M. White;Daniel C. Bartos

  • Naproxen sodium in menstrual migraine prophylaxis: a double-blind placebo controlled study.

    G. Sances;E. Martignoni;L. Fioroni;F. Blandini

  • Preterm Labor and Birth Management: Recommendations from the European Association of Perinatal Medicine.

    G C Di Renzo;L Cabero Roura;Fabio Facchinetti;Hanns Helmer

  • Efficacy of Cimicifuga racemosa on climacteric complaints: a randomized study versus low-dose transdermal estradiol.

    Rossella E Nappi;Barbara Malavasi;Benedetta Brundu;Fabio Facchinetti

  • Guidelines for the management of spontaneous preterm labor: identification of spontaneous preterm labor, diagnosis of preterm premature rupture of membranes, and preventive tools for preterm birth

    Gian Carlo Di Renzo;Lluis Cabero Roura;Fabio Facchinetti;Aris Antsaklis

Frequent Co-Authors

Felice Petraglia
Felice Petraglia University of Florence
Andrea R. Genazzani
Andrea R. Genazzani University of Pisa
Giuseppe Nappi
Giuseppe Nappi University of Pavia
Irene Cetin
Irene Cetin University of Milan
George R. Saade
George R. Saade The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Giorgio Sandrini
Giorgio Sandrini University of Pavia
Oliana Carnevali
Oliana Carnevali Marche Polytechnic University
Baha M. Sibai
Baha M. Sibai The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Fabio Parazzini
Fabio Parazzini University of Milan
Carlo Adolfo Porro
Carlo Adolfo Porro University of Modena and Reggio Emilia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering Medicine in the USA, it’s worth exploring related online degrees and alternative healthcare career pathways. Many students pursue allied health fields that offer flexibility, strong job prospects, and fulfilling work environments.

For nurses, advancing your career can start with flexible bridge programs such as asn to fnp that help registered nurses quickly become Family Nurse Practitioners. If you’re seeking a broader healthcare role, it’s essential to know how to evaluate healthcare administration degree programs to ensure your chosen program is accredited and offers a strong curriculum.

Nutrition is another growing field, and you can build your expertise through online degrees in nutrition which open doors in both clinical practice and wellness industries. For those already holding an RN license, career advancement may be achieved via online rn-bsn programs without clinicals, making it easier to balance work and study.

Exploring these related pathways can help you shape a rewarding career in healthcare and gain valuable credentials online, whether or not you ultimately pursue a medical degree.

Best Scientists Citing Fabio Facchinetti

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles