World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
60
Citations
13988
World Ranking
2913
National Ranking
1145

Erik Asphaug publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erik Asphaug sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 527 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Erik Asphaug D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erik Asphaug sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Erik Asphaug is affiliated with the University of Arizona in the United States and has made contributions primarily in the fields of Physics and Astronomy as well as Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their research spans various subfields including Astronomy and Astrophysics, Geophysics, Atmospheric Science, Mechanics of Materials, and Ecology.

Their work covers a range of topics such as Astro and Planetary Science, Planetary Science and Exploration, Geology and Paleoclimatology Research, Stellar, Planetary, and Galactic Studies, High-Pressure Geophysics and Materials, Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies, and Geological and Geochemical Analysis.

Erik Asphaug has contributed papers in several notable publication venues. Frequent venues include:

  • The Planetary Science Journal
  • Nature Astronomy
  • Nature
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Space Science Reviews

Notable recent publications by the scientist include:

  • Successful kinetic impact into an asteroid for planetary defence, 2023, Nature
  • The ESA Hera Mission: Detailed Characterization of the DART Impact Outcome and of the Binary Asteroid (65803) Didymos, 2022, The Planetary Science Journal
  • The New Generation Planetary Population Synthesis (NGPPS), 2021, Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • The New Generation Planetary Population Synthesis (NGPPS), 2021, Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Observations, Meteorites, and Models: A Preflight Assessment of the Composition and Formation of (16) Psyche, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Planets

Erik Asphaug frequently collaborates with other researchers. Coauthors they have worked with often include:

  • Saverio Cambioni
  • Alexandre Emsenhuber
  • Patrick Michel
  • S. R. Schwartz
  • Ronald-Louis Ballouz

Best Publications

  • Origin of the Moon in a giant impact near the end of the Earth's formation.

    Robin M. Canup;Erik Asphaug

  • Detection of Water in the LCROSS Ejecta Plume

    Anthony Colaprete;Peter Schultz;Jennifer Heldmann;Diane Wooden

  • Catastrophic Disruptions Revisited

    Willy Benz;Erik Asphaug

  • Dynamic fragmentation in impacts: Hydrocode simulation of laboratory impacts

    H. J. Melosh;E. V. Ryan;E. Asphaug

  • Size, Density, and Structure of Comet Shoemaker–Levy 9 Inferred from the Physics of Tidal Breakup

    Erik Asphaug;Willy Benz

  • Hit-and-run planetary collisions

    Erik Asphaug;Craig B. Agnor;Quentin Williams

  • Properties of Rubble-Pile Asteroid (101955) Bennu from OSIRIS-REx Imaging and Thermal Analysis

    D. N. DellaGiustina;J. P. Emery;D. R. Golish;Benjamin Rozitis

  • Mega-impact formation of the Mars hemispheric dichotomy

    Margarita M. Marinova;Oded Aharonson;Erik Asphaug

  • The ESA Hera Mission: Detailed Characterization of the DART Impact Outcome and of the Binary Asteroid (65803) Didymos

    Unknown

  • Density of comet Shoemaker–Levy 9 deduced by modelling breakup of the parent 'rubble pile'

    E. Asphaug;W. Benz

  • Validation of numerical codes for impact and explosion cratering: Impacts on strengthless and metal targets

    E. Pierazzo;N. Artemieva;N. Artemieva;E. Asphaug;E. C. Baldwin

  • Disruption of kilometre-sized asteroids by energetic collisions

    E. Asphaug;S. J. Ostro;R. S. Hudson;D. J. Scheeres

  • Asteroid Impact Tsunami: A Probabilistic Hazard Assessment

    Steven N. Ward;Erik Asphaug

  • Gravitational Aggregates: Evidence and Evolution

    D. C. Richardson;Z. M. Leinhardt;H. J. Melosh;W. F. Bottke

  • The formation of asteroid satellites in large impacts: Results from numerical simulations

    Daniel D. Durda;William F. Bottke;Brian L. Enke;William J. Merline

  • Craters, boulders and regolith of (101955) Bennu indicative of an old and dynamic surface

    K. J. Walsh;E. R. Jawin;R.-L. Ballouz;O. S. Barnouin

  • Size-frequency distributions of fragments from SPH/N-body simulations of asteroid impacts: Comparison with observed asteroid families

    Daniel D. Durda;William F. Bottke;David Nesvorný;Brian L. Enke

  • Accretion Efficiency during Planetary Collisions

    Craig Agnor;Erik Asphaug

  • Europa: Initial Galileo Geological Observations

    Ronald Greeley;Robert Sullivan;James Klemaszewski;Kim Homan

  • The Stickney Impact of Phobos: A Dynamical Model

    E. Asphaug;H. J. Melosh

  • European component of the AIDA mission to a binary asteroid: Characterization and interpretation of the impact of the DART mission

    Patrick Michel;Michael Kueppers;Holger Sierks;Ian Carnelli

  • Mercury and other iron-rich planetary bodies as relics of inefficient accretion

    E. Asphaug;A. Reufer;A. Reufer

  • Chondrule formation during planetesimal accretion

    Erik Asphaug;Martin Jutzi;Naor Movshovitz

Frequent Co-Authors

William F. Bottke
William F. Bottke Southwest Research Institute
Daniel J. Scheeres
Daniel J. Scheeres University of Colorado Boulder
Linda T. Elkins-Tanton
Linda T. Elkins-Tanton Arizona State University
Olivier S. Barnouin
Olivier S. Barnouin Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
H. J. Melosh
H. J. Melosh Purdue University West Lafayette
Harold C. Connolly
Harold C. Connolly Rowan University
Dante S. Lauretta
Dante S. Lauretta University of Arizona
Ronald Greeley
Ronald Greeley Arizona State University
Willy Benz
Willy Benz University of Bern

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences can open doors to several interdisciplinary fields. For students interested in understanding social dynamics alongside environmental issues, pursuing the best online sociology bachelor degree offers valuable insights into human behavior and societal impacts on natural resources.

Education professionals aiming to lead sustainability initiatives in academic or community settings may find advanced education through online EdD programs no dissertation a flexible path to gain leadership skills without the extensive research demands.

For those seeking rigorous academic leadership credentials, accredited options like accredited EdS to EdD programs provide a structured pathway to doctoral degrees emphasizing policy and program development, important for shaping environmental education.

Social work professionals interested in environmental justice may pursue specialized leadership training through DSW online programs, which combine social welfare expertise with advocacy for sustainable and equitable communities.

Best Scientists Citing Erik Asphaug

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles