World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
73
Citations
18556
World Ranking
19667
National Ranking
246

Eric Van Marck publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric Van Marck sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 324 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Eric Van Marck D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric Van Marck sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eric Van Marck is affiliated with the University of Antwerp in Belgium. The academic profile is primarily focused on this institution.

Despite the absence of detailed publication records, such as specific papers or frequent co-authors, Van Marck's research presence can be identified through the association with the University of Antwerp. This implies involvement in the academic activities typical of such an institution, including research, teaching, and collaboration within scholarly communities.

No information is available regarding recent papers, main fields or subfields of study, or specific topics actively researched by Eric Van Marck. Similarly, data on frequent publication venues, book publications, and awarded recognitions have not been provided.

Due to the lack of available bibliographic detail or documented contributions, the profile focuses on the institutional affiliation as the single verifiable aspect of scholarly identity for Eric Van Marck.

Best Publications

  • Direct evidence of extensive diversity of HIV-1 in Kinshasa by 1960

    Michael Worobey;Marlea Gemmel;Dirk E. Teuwen;Tamara Haselkorn

  • Randomized Phase III Study of Cisplatin With or Without Raltitrexed in Patients With Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: An Intergroup Study of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Group and the National Cancer Institute of Canada

    Jan P. van Meerbeeck;Rabab Gaafar;Christian Manegold;Rob J. Van Klaveren

  • An immunohistochemical procedure to detect patients with paraganglioma and phaeochromocytoma with germline SDHB, SDHC, or SDHD gene mutations: a retrospective and prospective analysis.

    Francien H van Nederveen;José Gaal;Judith Favier;Esther Korpershoek

  • Circulating interleukin-6 predicts survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

    Roberto Salgado;Sara Junius;Ina Benoy;Peter Van Dam

  • The isolation of nucleic acids from fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues-which methods are useful when?

    M. Thomas P. Gilbert;Tamara Haselkorn;Michael Bunce;Juan J. Sanchez

  • Increased Serum Interleukin-8 in Patients with Early and Metastatic Breast Cancer Correlates with Early Dissemination and Survival

    Ina H. Benoy;Roberto Salgado;Peter Van Dam;Katrien Geboers

  • Zoledronic Acid Treatment of 5T2MM‐Bearing Mice Inhibits the Development of Myeloma Bone Disease: Evidence for Decreased Osteolysis, Tumor Burden and Angiogenesis, and Increased Survival

    Peter I Croucher;Hendrik De Raeve;Mark J Perry;Anja Hijzen

  • Liver metastases from colorectal adenocarcinomas grow in three patterns with different angiogenesis and desmoplasia.

    Peter B. Vermeulen;Cecile Colpaert;Roberto Salgado;Ruben Royers

  • PPARα gene expression correlates with severity and histological treatment response in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis

    Sven Francque;An Verrijken;Sandrine Caron;Janne Prawitt

  • Investigations on the biology, epidemiology, pathology and control of Tunga penetrans in Brazil: I. Natural history of tungiasis in man

    Margit Eisele;Jörg Heukelbach;Eric Van Marck;Heinz Mehlhorn

  • Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes: an intriguing player in the survival of colorectal cancer patients.

    Vanessa Deschoolmeester;Marc Baay;Eric Van Marck;Joost Weyler

  • Increased Angiogenesis and Lymphangiogenesis in Inflammatory versus Noninflammatory Breast Cancer by Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase-PCR Gene Expression Quantification

    Ilse Van der Auwera;Steven J. Van Laere;Gert G. Van den Eynden;Ina Benoy

  • Re: Tumor angiogenesis as a prognostic assay for invasive ductal breast carcinoma.

    Vermeulen Pb;Libura J;Libura M;Hellemans Pw

  • Angiogenic cytokines in mesothelioma: a study of VEGF, FGF-1 and -2, and TGF beta expression.

    Samir Kumar-Singh;Joost Weyler;Manuella J. H. Martin;Peter B. Vermeulen

  • Tumor Lymphangiogenesis in Inflammatory Breast Carcinoma: A Histomorphometric Study

    Ilse Van der Auwera;Gert G. Van den Eynden;Cecile G. Colpaert;Steven J. Van Laere

  • Prognostic value of smoking status in operated non-small cell lung cancer.

    Peyman Sardari Nia;Joost Weyler;Cecile Colpaert;Peter Vermeulen

  • Prothrombotic factors in histologically proven nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

    An Verrijken;Sven Francque;Ilse Mertens;Janne Prawitt

  • Reporter gene-expressing bone marrow-derived stromal cells are immune-tolerated following implantation in the central nervous system of syngeneic immunocompetent mice

    Irene Bergwerf;Nathalie De Vocht;Bart Tambuyzer;Jacob Verschueren

  • Isolation of markers for chondro-osteogenic differentiation using cDNA library subtraction - Molecular cloning and characterization of a gene belonging to a novel multigene family of integral membrane proteins

    Willy Deleersnijder;Guizhu Hong;Rita Cortvrindt;Christophe Poirier

  • The presence of a fibrotic focus in invasive breast carcinoma correlates with the expression of carbonic anhydrase IX and is a marker of hypoxia and poor prognosis.

    Cecile G. Colpaert;Peter B. Vermeulen;Stephen B. Fox;Adrian L. Harris

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter B. Vermeulen
Peter B. Vermeulen University of Antwerp
Luc Dirix
Luc Dirix GZA Ziekenhuizen Campus Sint-Augustinus
Jan B. Vermorken
Jan B. Vermorken University of Antwerp
Sven Francque
Sven Francque University of Antwerp
Robert Colebunders
Robert Colebunders University of Antwerp
Luc Van Gaal
Luc Van Gaal University of Antwerp
Roberto Salgado
Roberto Salgado Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
André M. Deelder
André M. Deelder Leiden University Medical Center
Yukari C. Manabe
Yukari C. Manabe Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Zwi N. Berneman
Zwi N. Berneman University of Antwerp

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medical studies in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degree options and career pathways. Students interested in blending healthcare with nutrition can consider an online dietitian degree to build expertise in dietary science and wellness.

For those looking to step into healthcare leadership, cahme accredited online mha programs list offers guidance on high-quality, flexible programs that prepare graduates for administrative roles in hospitals and healthcare organizations.

Registered nurses who want to advance their careers without traditional classroom commitments can find convenient rn to bsn programs with no clinical requirements, making degree completion more accessible for working professionals.

Ambitious nursing professionals can also explore the fastest online dnp programs to quickly elevate their qualifications and move into advanced practice or leadership positions.

These online programs offer diverse options for careers in healthcare, accommodating a wide range of interests, schedules, and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Eric Van Marck

Recently Published Articles