World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 73 19666 18456 246 236 324 18556

Eric Van Marck publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Eric Van Marck between 1978 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Eric Van Marck published across 46 years, from 1978 to 2023, averaging 7.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2004. 4 of the 331 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2004. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 2 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 7 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 12 publications 1995: 14 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 13 publications 1999: 17 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 21 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 19 publications 2004: 26 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 22 publications 2007: 22 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 3 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 4 publications
1978 2023

331 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Eric Van Marck: publications per year, 1978 to 2023
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 0
1980 1
1981 2
1982 0
1983 1
1984 1
1985 1
1986 1
1987 2
1988 3
1989 0
1990 1
1991 7
1992 8
1993 9
1994 12
1995 14
1996 10
1997 10
1998 13
1999 17
2000 12
2001 21
2002 15
2003 19
2004 26
2005 13
2006 22
2007 22
2008 17
2009 16
2010 14
2011 5
2012 3
2013 1
2014 3
2015 3
2016 1
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 4
Total 331
Download as CSV

Eric Van Marck publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric Van Marck sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 321–340 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 324 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895 324
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Eric Van Marck D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric Van Marck sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72–73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391 73
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Eric Van Marck is affiliated with the University of Antwerp in Belgium. The academic profile is primarily focused on this institution.

Despite the absence of detailed publication records, such as specific papers or frequent co-authors, Van Marck's research presence can be identified through the association with the University of Antwerp. This implies involvement in the academic activities typical of such an institution, including research, teaching, and collaboration within scholarly communities.

No information is available regarding recent papers, main fields or subfields of study, or specific topics actively researched by Eric Van Marck. Similarly, data on frequent publication venues, book publications, and awarded recognitions have not been provided.

Due to the lack of available bibliographic detail or documented contributions, the profile focuses on the institutional affiliation as the single verifiable aspect of scholarly identity for Eric Van Marck.

Best Publications

  • Direct evidence of extensive diversity of HIV-1 in Kinshasa by 1960

    Michael Worobey;Marlea Gemmel;Dirk E. Teuwen;Tamara Haselkorn

  • Randomized Phase III Study of Cisplatin With or Without Raltitrexed in Patients With Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: An Intergroup Study of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Group and the National Cancer Institute of Canada

    Jan P. van Meerbeeck;Rabab Gaafar;Christian Manegold;Rob J. Van Klaveren

  • An immunohistochemical procedure to detect patients with paraganglioma and phaeochromocytoma with germline SDHB, SDHC, or SDHD gene mutations: a retrospective and prospective analysis.

    Francien H van Nederveen;José Gaal;Judith Favier;Esther Korpershoek

  • Circulating interleukin-6 predicts survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

    Roberto Salgado;Sara Junius;Ina Benoy;Peter Van Dam

  • The isolation of nucleic acids from fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues-which methods are useful when?

    M. Thomas P. Gilbert;Tamara Haselkorn;Michael Bunce;Juan J. Sanchez

  • Increased Serum Interleukin-8 in Patients with Early and Metastatic Breast Cancer Correlates with Early Dissemination and Survival

    Ina H. Benoy;Roberto Salgado;Peter Van Dam;Katrien Geboers

  • Zoledronic Acid Treatment of 5T2MM‐Bearing Mice Inhibits the Development of Myeloma Bone Disease: Evidence for Decreased Osteolysis, Tumor Burden and Angiogenesis, and Increased Survival

    Peter I Croucher;Hendrik De Raeve;Mark J Perry;Anja Hijzen

  • Liver metastases from colorectal adenocarcinomas grow in three patterns with different angiogenesis and desmoplasia.

    Peter B. Vermeulen;Cecile Colpaert;Roberto Salgado;Ruben Royers

  • PPARα gene expression correlates with severity and histological treatment response in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis

    Sven Francque;An Verrijken;Sandrine Caron;Janne Prawitt

  • Investigations on the biology, epidemiology, pathology and control of Tunga penetrans in Brazil: I. Natural history of tungiasis in man

    Margit Eisele;Jörg Heukelbach;Eric Van Marck;Heinz Mehlhorn

  • Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes: an intriguing player in the survival of colorectal cancer patients.

    Vanessa Deschoolmeester;Marc Baay;Eric Van Marck;Joost Weyler

  • Increased Angiogenesis and Lymphangiogenesis in Inflammatory versus Noninflammatory Breast Cancer by Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase-PCR Gene Expression Quantification

    Ilse Van der Auwera;Steven J. Van Laere;Gert G. Van den Eynden;Ina Benoy

  • Re: Tumor angiogenesis as a prognostic assay for invasive ductal breast carcinoma.

    Vermeulen Pb;Libura J;Libura M;Hellemans Pw

  • Angiogenic cytokines in mesothelioma: a study of VEGF, FGF-1 and -2, and TGF beta expression.

    Samir Kumar-Singh;Joost Weyler;Manuella J. H. Martin;Peter B. Vermeulen

  • Tumor Lymphangiogenesis in Inflammatory Breast Carcinoma: A Histomorphometric Study

    Ilse Van der Auwera;Gert G. Van den Eynden;Cecile G. Colpaert;Steven J. Van Laere

  • Prognostic value of smoking status in operated non-small cell lung cancer.

    Peyman Sardari Nia;Joost Weyler;Cecile Colpaert;Peter Vermeulen

  • Prothrombotic factors in histologically proven nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

    An Verrijken;Sven Francque;Ilse Mertens;Janne Prawitt

  • Reporter gene-expressing bone marrow-derived stromal cells are immune-tolerated following implantation in the central nervous system of syngeneic immunocompetent mice

    Irene Bergwerf;Nathalie De Vocht;Bart Tambuyzer;Jacob Verschueren

  • Isolation of markers for chondro-osteogenic differentiation using cDNA library subtraction - Molecular cloning and characterization of a gene belonging to a novel multigene family of integral membrane proteins

    Willy Deleersnijder;Guizhu Hong;Rita Cortvrindt;Christophe Poirier

  • The presence of a fibrotic focus in invasive breast carcinoma correlates with the expression of carbonic anhydrase IX and is a marker of hypoxia and poor prognosis.

    Cecile G. Colpaert;Peter B. Vermeulen;Stephen B. Fox;Adrian L. Harris

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter B. Vermeulen
Peter B. Vermeulen University of Antwerp
Luc Dirix
Luc Dirix GZA Ziekenhuizen Campus Sint-Augustinus
Jan B. Vermorken
Jan B. Vermorken University of Antwerp
Sven Francque
Sven Francque University of Antwerp
Robert Colebunders
Robert Colebunders University of Antwerp
Luc Van Gaal
Luc Van Gaal University of Antwerp
Roberto Salgado
Roberto Salgado Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
André M. Deelder
André M. Deelder Leiden University Medical Center
Yukari C. Manabe
Yukari C. Manabe Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Zwi N. Berneman
Zwi N. Berneman University of Antwerp

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medical studies in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degree options and career pathways. Students interested in blending healthcare with nutrition can consider an online dietitian degree to build expertise in dietary science and wellness.

For those looking to step into healthcare leadership, cahme accredited online mha programs list offers guidance on high-quality, flexible programs that prepare graduates for administrative roles in hospitals and healthcare organizations.

Registered nurses who want to advance their careers without traditional classroom commitments can find convenient rn to bsn programs with no clinical requirements, making degree completion more accessible for working professionals.

Ambitious nursing professionals can also explore the fastest online dnp programs to quickly elevate their qualifications and move into advanced practice or leadership positions.

These online programs offer diverse options for careers in healthcare, accommodating a wide range of interests, schedules, and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Eric Van Marck

Recently Published Articles